Originally posted by: Howard
Can anybody help?Originally posted by: FrustratedUser

I just did. You want one that's even better?Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: Howard
Can anybody help?Originally posted by: FrustratedUser

Please make a new drawing. I lost my Enigma code book.
It's a DC motor with series-wired armature/electromagnet, with a 3-pole commutator. I was just wondering if the resulting magnetic field would run the armature.Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
That was better.
How are you connecting the rotor.
Looks like it aint gonna run like that.
Two things that matter for magnetic force are surface area and proximity. The pickaxe design accomplishes both.Originally posted by: Howard
One more question:
Why is the lamination stack here shaped like a pick-axe instead of just being cut-off? Is it to spread out the magnetic flux of the windings?
Thanks!Originally posted by: syberscott
Two things that matter for magnetic force are surface area and proximity. The pickaxe design accomplishes both.Originally posted by: Howard
One more question:
Why is the lamination stack here shaped like a pick-axe instead of just being cut-off? Is it to spread out the magnetic flux of the windings?
(I have a migrain right now, so I hope that made sense).
Less reluctance.Originally posted by: yellowfiero
it should work, but I don't understand the horseshoe. Why not just wire two separate electromagnets, one on each end?
Most of the lines of force emanate from the poles, but even if that were the case, the only thing that would happen would be an increase of friction between the axle and its sleeve.Originally posted by: NorthRiver
I am no Guru, but it looks wrong. Don't you think that it being shapped like a horseshoe, it would tend to want to pull the rotor into it. Just a thought, I don't know anything about this?
Originally posted by: KMurphy
It won't work like the simple schematic you posted illustrates. You have to excite the field in the armature with an external voltage source. You must have pole pairs - there is no such thing in the universe as a mono-pole magnet.
The commutator is used to reverse the polarity of the excitation field to repel/attract the poles of a natural, rare-earth or electromagnet; causing rotation. To change the rpm of the armature, you must change the resistance in the windings. The way your schematic is drawn, the armature would turn zero rpm. How big of a device are you trying to make and what is the driven load?
The wedge shaped lamination stack is also used to secure the windings when the armature is turning.
Go here for more info that is pretty easy to understand.
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book5/16g.htm
Nobody said that was a monopole magnet? There's an N and an S. I also know the function of a commutator. I noted in the topic post that the commutator design and the wiring setup is done correctly.Originally posted by: KMurphy
It won't work like the simple schematic you posted illustrates. You have to excite the field in the armature with an external voltage source. You must have pole pairs - there is no such thing in the universe as a mono-pole magnet.
The commutator is used to reverse the polarity of the excitation field to repel/attract the poles of a natural, rare-earth or electromagnet; causing rotation. To change the rpm of the armature, you must change the resistance in the windings. The way your schematic is drawn, the armature would turn zero rpm. How big of a device are you trying to make and what is the driven load?
The wedge shaped lamination stack is also used to secure the windings when the armature is turning.
Go here for more info that is pretty easy to understand.
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book5/16g.htm
Bah! How ghey.Originally posted by: Howard
School project. We'll be using retinal dynos to measure the RPM.


 
				
		