You make a good argument but you completely put your credibility in question with your last sentence. You say this started with Bush, but the utility companies were what, waiting for Obama to put out their letters? That's pretty absurd.
Does your link show which of the steps LG&E is taking that are related solely to the 1990 legislation? If so, I missed it.
*edit* the lazy utilities have been lobbying against this since 1990. They rather poison our nation's air with mercury and other shit than comply with pending legislation like the majority of coal plants already have. The key difference is now they have wingnut sites to run with stories that blame Obama, which is how these letters have made their way to the internet. *edit*
I'm not sure how I can help you further. The section of the article I have already quoted talks about the scrubbers and fabric-filter baghouse systems which is the sole source of the rate increase.
http://www.lanereport.com/articles/fastlane_article.cfm?id=254
I suppose I will just copy the important section once again, but this time use bold-faced font to assist you.
article said:LG&E will request $1.4 billion to modernize the flue gas desulfurization systems, better known as scrubbers, at the Mill Creek generating station as well as install fabric-filter baghouse systems for increased particulate and mercury control on all units at Mill Creek and for Unit 1 at Trimble County.
The impact on LG&E’s electric customers is estimated to be an increase of 2.3 percent in 2012, growing to an increase of 19.2 percent in 2016. For an LG&E residential electric customer using 1,000 kWh of energy per month, this increase will equate to an estimated initial impact on their bills in 2012 of $1.96 per month, with an estimated impact of $16.33 per month by 2016.
KU will also request approximately $1.1 billion for upgrades that include fabric-filter baghouse systems for increased particulate and mercury control on all units at Brown and Ghent generating stations and the conversion of a wet storage facility to a dry landfill at the Brown generating station.
The impact on KU’s customers is estimated to be an increase of 1.5 percent in 2012, growing to an increase of 12.2 percent in 2016. For a KU residential customer using 1,000 kWh of energy per month, this increase will equate to an estimated initial impact on their bills in 2012 of $1.13 per month. This will gradually increase to about $9.46 per month by 2016.
Regarding the origin of these controls from the 1990 legislation let me assist you with a link: http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/overview.txt. Title III: Air Toxics discusses using "Maximum Achievable Control Technology" (MACT) which has been demonstrated for the new EPA measures as over half of the coal plants currently use the technologies bolded above. The answer: 100% of the increase passed on to consumers is due to Bush #1 and the 1990 congress.So, my question to you is, what portion of the increase to be passed on to consumers is due to legislation passed by the 1990 Congress and what portion is due to the new and latest EPA regulations? You're obviously in the business, so I bet you know right where to look for the information.
Finally, pointing out partisan hackery does not make one a partisan hack. Of course the subtlety of this point may be lost on you.
Last edited:
