Election 2004 Voting

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,019
156
106
I don't want to make it any easier for people to vote. I only want people voting who have a shred of motivation to go out and do it. The people who would only vote if they could do it online are the same ones who get all their information online and consider themselves "informed". In my mind, they aren't qualified anyway.

Our voting system is archaic in some ways, but that's exactly what protects the system from massive fraud.

If you've never voted, here's how it works (at least in my town). You go to your assigned voting place, which depends on the town, ward, and district you live in. Each district comprises about 400-600 people. When you report, there is a representative from each of the Republican and Democratic parties there. You give your name and address, and they pull a card from a file box that you sign. They match your signature against the master record in a large binder. Then you go into the voting booth.

The people who are handling the file cards generally know a lot of the people coming to vote because their district doesn't include thousands of people. Having reps from each party there keeps both sides honest.

All these factors help to prevent widespread fraud.
 

DingDingDao

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
3,044
0
71
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
probably not more likely, because as of now its unlikely that i wouldnt vote... besides, that, i can vote at a church about 1 mile from my house... so its pretty convenient anyways...

Gotta love that...separation of church and state... HAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." Sorry that bugs me...

But no, nooooo voting on the internet, way too many issues with security and fraud, etc, etc. So... no.

because the church building is being used as a place to vote?
you guys really need to re-think your stance if you think there's an issue with voting inside of a building.. its a building...
the church has volunteered their staff, their building, and their time to encourage people to vote, and this is the kind of response? just like any other voting venue, there is no campaigning or any of the sort allowed within a certain distance from the building.. the volunteers are allowed to make no mention of any names or parties...
some of you people try and take the seperation of church & state thing too far...

Sheesh man lighten up. It just pegged me as funny. Relax.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
I would not trust it, but then again I can go to multiple polling places now and vote...so both sides have its faults. I did not like the fact that I did not even have to show a picture id to vote in 2000.

Regardless I will be voting in 2004, not that it really matters since I will be voting largely Libertarian and third party voting.
 

cmdavid

Diamond Member
May 23, 2001
4,114
0
0
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
probably not more likely, because as of now its unlikely that i wouldnt vote... besides, that, i can vote at a church about 1 mile from my house... so its pretty convenient anyways...

Gotta love that...separation of church and state... HAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." Sorry that bugs me...

But no, nooooo voting on the internet, way too many issues with security and fraud, etc, etc. So... no.

because the church building is being used as a place to vote?
you guys really need to re-think your stance if you think there's an issue with voting inside of a building.. its a building...
the church has volunteered their staff, their building, and their time to encourage people to vote, and this is the kind of response? just like any other voting venue, there is no campaigning or any of the sort allowed within a certain distance from the building.. the volunteers are allowed to make no mention of any names or parties...
some of you people try and take the seperation of church & state thing too far...

Sheesh man lighten up. It just pegged me as funny. Relax.

:eek:.. sorry bout that...
 

DingDingDao

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
3,044
0
71
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
probably not more likely, because as of now its unlikely that i wouldnt vote... besides, that, i can vote at a church about 1 mile from my house... so its pretty convenient anyways...

Gotta love that...separation of church and state... HAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." Sorry that bugs me...

But no, nooooo voting on the internet, way too many issues with security and fraud, etc, etc. So... no.

because the church building is being used as a place to vote?
you guys really need to re-think your stance if you think there's an issue with voting inside of a building.. its a building...
the church has volunteered their staff, their building, and their time to encourage people to vote, and this is the kind of response? just like any other voting venue, there is no campaigning or any of the sort allowed within a certain distance from the building.. the volunteers are allowed to make no mention of any names or parties...
some of you people try and take the seperation of church & state thing too far...

Sheesh man lighten up. It just pegged me as funny. Relax.

:eek:.. sorry bout that...

np...I try to add comic relief to the threads that might end up in P&N...
 

mwtgg

Lifer
Dec 6, 2001
10,491
0
0
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: DingDingDao
Originally posted by: cmdavid
probably not more likely, because as of now its unlikely that i wouldnt vote... besides, that, i can vote at a church about 1 mile from my house... so its pretty convenient anyways...

Gotta love that...separation of church and state... HAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." Sorry that bugs me...

But no, nooooo voting on the internet, way too many issues with security and fraud, etc, etc. So... no.

because the church building is being used as a place to vote?
you guys really need to re-think your stance if you think there's an issue with voting inside of a building.. its a building...
the church has volunteered their staff, their building, and their time to encourage people to vote, and this is the kind of response? just like any other voting venue, there is no campaigning or any of the sort allowed within a certain distance from the building.. the volunteers are allowed to make no mention of any names or parties...
some of you people try and take the seperation of church & state thing too far...

Sheesh man lighten up. It just pegged me as funny. Relax.

:eek:.. sorry bout that...

np...I try to add comic relief to the threads that might end up in P&N...

*taps sarcasmo 3000*

Awww crap it's broken. Sorry, but I like to pounce on the "Separation of Church and State" crap. :eek:

*slowly backs away from thread*