Brigandier
Diamond Member
- Feb 12, 2008
- 4,394
- 2
- 81
and you want to be a CS major? Dam son, suck it up.
Nah, man, he wants to be a rich supaplaya. He just sees CS as a way to get rich.
and you want to be a CS major? Dam son, suck it up.
The integral on the left is very similar to an arc length problem (of a parabola) that I assign to my calc I students every year. It's one of my favorite problems because it starts with knowing the formula for finding the arclength, then they need to make a "tricky" trig substitution (replace x with tan(theta), dx with sec²(theta)). Then, to integrate sec^3, they have to do an integration by parts. During the integration by parts, they have to integrate secant, which involves picking "multiply by sec(theta)+tan(theta) over sec(theta)+tan(theta)" out of thin air. (Plus there are some coefficients/constants in there, since it's not simply the length of y=.5x^2 from 0 to 1.)
When I teach them how to integrate sec(x), they always ask "how did you figure out to multiply by that??"
Back when we used chalkboards, it was the best problem in the world to do before an Algebra class - I'd make the solution wrap around the room & would leave it up. "What's all that stuff?" "Oh, that's the answer to ONE of their homework problems last night. Now, you were whining again about how much work the quadratic formula is??"
just to be cruel, you should use a problem from functional/variational calculus. that shit was crazy!![]()
Christ, now I'm being as generous as busydude
Now your turn to answer our questions, TridenT.
Begin with a generic quadratic equation in standard form: ax^2+bx+c=0. Derive the quadratic formula. Go.
He's taking calc II. If he can't do the above problem, it's pretty sad.
I know it has been a while for him. This is why I am curious as to if he can do it. Even if he doesn't remember how, which is fine, it is more an exercise in persistence. Considering TridenT's posts in this thread, this is what I suspect he lacks, which is why I ask him to do this.
I already looked it up online. I definitely wouldn't have given it enough time to know to move the c to the other side, divide by a, etc.
I have other shit to do today, like physics homework. (And a lot of it) And I don't have very much time considering I just woke up because I've been exhausted these past few days.
I already looked it up online. I definitely wouldn't have given it enough time to know to move the c to the other side, divide by a, etc.
I have other shit to do today, like physics homework. (And a lot of it) And I don't have very much time considering I just woke up because I've been exhausted these past few days.
Alright... so, I went to the tutoring center. Guy helped me out. Also had the solutions manual for the book. Basically my whole class has gone to the tutoring center because the guy can't teach for shit. The tutors there are definitely not that good either. They're more of the type that will solve it out and show it to you, which is OK but I'd like it explained at least.
Anyway, the only problem that wasn't solved because they couldn't figure it out (the guy who is the math major) was the 2nd problem on the last image (the white one).
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/984/14660777.jpg
I felt like I had a moment of brilliance but since I am not very good with the notation and shit I was like, "Damn." and then lost it.
Of course he doesn't know anything. He's a math major. Math majors spend 2 years with calculus and then move on to pure math.
dz = k*x^(k-1) dx l(x^k) = l(z) convert to z and back. simplify.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!..
Why TecHNooB, why?
dz = k*x^(k-1) dx
l(x^k) = l(z)
convert to z and back. simplify.
Convert what to z. D: Not that I see how I would do that...
You're doomed. Someone gave you the answer but you can't resolve the simple steps in between.
There are still a bunch of steps in between.
Convert what to z. Not that I see how I would do that...
I don't exactly see how I can convert l(x^k) = l(z).
Integrating dz=k*x^(k-1)dx is not really going to get me anywhere. It just proves l(x^k)=l(x^k)... which is useless if I need to prove kl(x) = l(x^k).
Of course he doesn't know anything. He's a math major. Math majors spend 2 years with calculus and then move on to pure math.