- Jan 15, 2013
- 12,181
- 35
- 91
Isn't copper better for pretty much everything?
What do you mean by "better for pretty much everything?" For carrying a certain amount of current, you need a bit larger of a cross sectional area; but cost-wise, for identical current carrying capacities, aluminum has copper beaten by a mile. Issue two is aluminum oxide - and that's fairly easily circumvented. (There are other termination issues related to the tendency of aluminum to build up a coat of aluminum oxide, but these problems are pretty much eliminated with proper terminations & worksmanship. Creep used to be a problem, but, as far as I'm aware, that's not really an issue any more, assuming good materials.)Isn't copper better for pretty much everything?
What do you mean by "better for pretty much everything?" For carrying a certain amount of current, you need a bit larger of a cross sectional area; but cost-wise, for identical current carrying capacities, aluminum has copper beaten by a mile. Issue two is aluminum oxide - and that's fairly easily circumvented. (There are other termination issues related to the tendency of aluminum to build up a coat of aluminum oxide, but these problems are pretty much eliminated with proper terminations & worksmanship. Creep used to be a problem, but, as far as I'm aware, that's not really an issue any more, assuming good materials.)
The most common conductor in use for transmission today is aluminum conductor steel reinforced (ACSR). Also seeing much use is all-aluminum-alloy conductor (AAAC). Aluminum is used because it has about half the weight of a comparable resistance copper cable (though larger diameter due to lower specific conductivity), as well as being cheaper.[1] Copper was more popular in the past and is still in use, especially at lower voltages and for grounding. Bare copper conductors are light green.
I thought the skin effect also had something to do with aluminum being used instead of copper on high voltage transmission.
At 60 Hz in copper, the skin depth is about 8.5 mm.
Hm, maybe I am thinking multi conductor versus solid conductor...
house insurance companies don't like aluminum wiring here.my first house was aluminium.
in the 70's when it was built copper was too expensive.
aluminium is just fine and will pass any house inspection because at the time it was code.
if you renovate then you must change it to copper.
house insurance companies don't like aluminum wiring here.
Ontario Hydro recommended removing it and running copper instead.
Its next to impossible to find co-al compliant electrical devices like receptacles and switches.
My last house had aluminum wiring. yuck.
http://www.cpsc.gov//PageFiles/118856/516.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/19/realestate/19home.html?_r=0
Around here aluminum wiring is typically old installs and ready for chucking.
I'm looking forward to the day when I get rid of the last of the old aluminum wiring in my house.