Originally posted by: Strang
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: Strang
Ack, my bad. It turns out that they're renaming the existing DH of the Year award after Edgar, not creating a new award.
And anyone who thinks Edgar doesn't belong in the HoF cares more about stats (or arguing about what baseball should be rather than recognizing what baseball
is) than recognizing excellence on the field.
"Excellence on the field"??????????? Ummm, newsflash here, Edgar wasn't allowed on the field due to gross incompetence with a glove. He was a designated hitter, a player not good enough to get on the field, let alone display excellence once he was there. Women's softball allows for designated runners to compensate for non-athletes who can't even waddle their asses down the basepath. Should the best designated runner get an award?
:roll:
Last time I checked, the batter's box and bases were still on the field. And your argument is still an inability to see what baseball
is. If your beef is with the position itself, don't take it out on Edgar -- he didn't change the rules.
As for Edgar's low amount of hits in 18 years, the Mariners didn't let him take over at 3rd base until they traded Jim Presley (who hit an awe-inspiring .236). He didn't become a starter until he was 27.