Exactly...Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
cheap, stable (depending on the chipset).
usually adequate features.
not normally the best choice for overclocking.
Originally posted by: m3rcury
I had a K7S5A. Couldn't overclock at all (bios had no option for oc'ing), but that mobo was rock stable. I have fond memories of that mobo.
And the pcb was purple!!
Originally posted by: jrp4277
ok thanks guys. I was just curious cause they are good for a budget it seems. "low price"
Originally posted by: bluemax
I'm kinda' surprised to not see anyone pooping on ECS! Yeah they're cheap and un-fancy. ECS is probably the world's biggest supplier though so the failure rate is quite low. 🙂
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Personally, I would go for something a little higher quality than ECS/ASRock/Foxconn.
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Personally, I would go for something a little higher quality than ECS/ASRock/Foxconn.
Isn't that a little strange to be lumping Foxconn in with ECS? I thought that Foxconn used to be one of Intel's primary OEM suppliers for mobos before Asus got that gig (often used in name-brand OEM PCs, like those SE440BX boards used in Gateways back in the day)?
Is there anything bad or sub-standard that I should know about Foxconn boards?