Economic Plans Head to Head: Romney vs. Obama

[Matt1970]

FTFY.

LOL, he hasn't even done anything yet or even got into office and you are already claiming he gets no credit.

 

[Munky]

lol, what a wimp.

Since you continue to lie about your alleged linking, there's no reason why anyone should take your idiotic trolling seriously. This is all on your record BTW.

And yet again, all of this could have been avoided if you had read carefully and didn't make asinine assumptions. I literally cannot help that you read sentences and words differently than the average non-tard. There's little to say to someone, like you, that attempts to deny the reality about jail/fines; that when the regulator charged with assessing jail time and/or fines to financial institutions decides to pursue prosecution with the resultant being a fine, that somehow you believe this means the regulator didn't do its job when (as I very, very clearly stated) the evidence "wasn't provable under the law so they couldn't actually jail people for it".


Laws don't mean shit if you can't enforce them, kid. I can write this out in crayon, if you're that confused.

Lol, tell us more about your so-called reality. Your lack of evidence assertion was a lie and/or dumbass assumption, just like the rest of your retarded posts. You fail at linking to anything supporting your assumption, and when I specifically linked to an audit investigation which documented the illegal fraud, as well as statutes which state that jail is an appropriate punishment, apparently that kind of information was too much to fit into your pea-sized brain. Keep up the dancing, it bound to convince someone any day now.

Point blank; you lack the education to understand the subtleties of this debate. So for future reference; don't attempt to infer things you don't understand.

I didn't take a position on Bush's role because it wasn't necessary to understanding the crux of the point I was making (which still eludes you); that the Obama admin inherited a mess and that people (rightfully) don't blame him for it. Simple, straight-forward. I can see how a lesser person wouldn't understand this. I'm not surprised you didn't, in hindsight.

You linked to it, therefore you already showed your "position" is just another weak attempt to blame Bush for the incompetence of your lefty-loon party. Nothing you say is going to fool anyone, but keep trying, it's just adding more to the record.

First you have to make an honest effort to reply to the 9 studies, that way you can concede defeat on my point about the stimulus' success (and therefore the Obama admin's successful handling of that initial part of the financial crisis). Then we can get to this second, different point you are making, whatever the hell you think it is, lol.



Your lame Goldman Sachs example had quite literally nothing to do with my point, which I will post again since you're woefully confused; after-the-fact analyses of something that already happened...no predictions necessary.

Bwhahaha, did you even read your own damn links? There's hardly a single page in there without the two favorite words of idiot wanna-be-scientist economists - "estimate" and "model." And then you rant about a bunch of garbage numbers as if you knew WTF you were talking about. You wanna see real numbers kid, then here's the real impact of your so-called recovery - http://www.zerohedge.com/contribute...ve-we’re-depression-and-stimulus-hasnt-worked. Unemployment is up, labor participation rate is down, production is down, and government tax receipts are down. My Goldman Sachs example shows exactly what happens when clueless oafs like yourself try to apply estimates and models in place of reality.

Stick to your lame, shitty day job. You're not good at conjuring up insults.

Nope, all of this well documented and on the record for people to see that these are indeed false claims.

I guess you'll just have to keep posting proof instead of these sad attempts at linking to MERS regs allowing jailable offenses when I have never, ever denied this reality. Oh wells. rofl.

Lol, you must have failed at getting a job, that's why you're stuck in your sad academic bubble, freeloading off others. Have fun paying off those loans kid, I'll be sitting poolside while you're flipping burgers and preaching about the great jobless recovery.

 

[Anarchist420]

you are already claiming he gets no credit.

Have you seen his campaign's website? Just wondering🙂

The absolute most he would cut in his first year is $375Bn and that's being generous. Dr. Paul would cut $1Tn in his first year and actually reduce government revenues, whereas Romney wants more tariffs on China made imports and wants them to stop devaluing their currency. One of the bigger Romney supporters I know admitted that even if Romney served a full 8 years he wouldn't balance the budget.

 

[IGBT]

your obama is a convincing, practiced liar and when called to account, will make up anything spontaneously to fit his needs at that moment. Then send out his back peddlers to explain what he "really" meant.

 

[Jhhnn]

your obama is a convincing, practiced liar and when called to account, will make up anything spontaneously to fit his needs at that moment. Then send out his back peddlers to explain what he "really" meant.

I thought you were talking about Romney until I read it again.

The Romney plan is the Ryan plan, the Rich get richer at the expense of everybody else plan. Failure to recognize that is willful self deception on the part of so-called "conservatives", and an excellent example of the defective thinking behind the identity politics of the Right.

 

[First]

Since you continue to lie about your alleged linking, there's no reason why anyone should take your idiotic trolling seriously. This is all on your record BTW.

Whatever helps you sleep at night. I quoted and linked it for you. Keep telling yourself whatever you need to, one day you just may believe it yourself.

Lol, tell us more about your so-called reality. Your lack of evidence assertion was a lie and/or dumbass assumption, just like the rest of your retarded posts. You fail at linking to anything supporting your assumption, and when I specifically linked to an audit investigation which documented the illegal fraud, as well as statutes which state that jail is an appropriate punishment, apparently that kind of information was too much to fit into your pea-sized brain. Keep up the dancing, it bound to convince someone any day now.

I'll repost since you're still ducking and weaving: Yet again, all of this could have been avoided if you had read carefully and didn't make asinine assumptions. I literally cannot help that you read sentences and words differently than the average non-tard. There's little to say to someone, like you, that attempts to deny the reality about jail/fines; that when the regulator charged with assessing jail time and/or fines to financial institutions decides to pursue prosecution with the resultant being a fine, that somehow you believe this means the regulator didn't do its job when (as I very, very clearly stated) the evidence "wasn't provable under the law so they couldn't actually jail people for it". Laws don't mean shit if you can't enforce them, kid. I can write this out in crayon, if you're that confused.

You linked to it, therefore you already showed your "position" is just another weak attempt to blame Bush for the incompetence of your lefty-loon party. Nothing you say is going to fool anyone, but keep trying, it's just adding more to the record.

You didn't infer correctly, it's well documented at this point. Man up and move on; the Obama admin inherited a mess and people (rightfully) don't blame him for it. Simple, straight-forward. I can see how a lesser person wouldn't understand this. I'm not surprised you didn't, in hindsight.

Bwhahaha, did you even read your own damn links? There's hardly a single page in there without the two favorite words of idiot wanna-be-scientist economists - "estimate" and "model." And then you rant about a bunch of garbage numbers as if you knew WTF you were talking about.

Keep the bullshit retorts to a minimum, as the deflections are getting far too numerous to be all that entertaining at this point. Like I said, these are after-the-fact analysis so your continued inane assertion about estimates and models don't even come into the equation in much of this discussion.

You wanna see real numbers kid, then here's the real impact of your so-called recovery - http://www.zerohedge.com/contribute...ve-we’re-depression-and-stimulus-hasnt-worked. Unemployment is up, labor participation rate is down, production is down, and government tax receipts are down. My Goldman Sachs example shows exactly what happens when clueless oafs like yourself try to apply estimates and models in place of reality.

lmao, I've debunked zerohedge a number of times on their nonsense contrarian analysis, including on participation rate. I'm not sure what you believe you just linked to, but you'll have to explain it in your own words (you won't, because you can't, of course), as zerohedge has been well known to get all sorts of shit wrong, including just recently where they thought 1.2M people were removed from the labor force randomly in one month. Reality; new BLS census data adjusted the number. Drrrr.

Also, I will still continue to cite the 9 studies on the stimulus' success you bitched out of responding to, as well as the reality that your bullshit Keating et al comparisons (pure theft) during the S&L crisis are not comparable to the 2008 financial crisis' circumstances or laws.

Lol, you must have failed at getting a job, that's why you're stuck in your sad academic bubble, freeloading off others. Have fun paying off those loans kid, I'll be sitting poolside while you're flipping burgers and preaching about the great jobless recovery.

I've work private industry since 18 (over a decade now), never worked in academia other than actually being educated there. My loans are minimal and I'll make a lot more than you over my lifetime. So yeah, I'll enjoy myself. I suggest going back to school if you want better pay and intellectual enlightenment.

 

[Munky]

Whatever helps you sleep at night. I quoted and linked it for you. Keep telling yourself whatever you need to, one day you just may believe it yourself.

What a delusional troll. You did not link to what you allegedly quoted, no matter how many ways you try to spin it. You can't even name the statute you allegedly quoted if your pathetic life depended on it.

I'll repost since you're still ducking and weaving: Yet again, all of this could have been avoided if you had read carefully and didn't make asinine assumptions. I literally cannot help that you read sentences and words differently than the average non-tard. There's little to say to someone, like you, that attempts to deny the reality about jail/fines; that when the regulator charged with assessing jail time and/or fines to financial institutions decides to pursue prosecution with the resultant being a fine, that somehow you believe this means the regulator didn't do its job when (as I very, very clearly stated) the evidence "wasn't provable under the law so they couldn't actually jail people for it". Laws don't mean shit if you can't enforce them, kid. I can write this out in crayon, if you're that confused.

Your BS excuse didn't work last time, so take a hint and don't bother repeating the same moronic rant. You have zero evidence to support your dumbass assertion that "it wasn't provable under the law", and I already proved you wrong with the results of an audit investigation, as well as the statutes which make such offenses punishable by jail. Go back to 4th grade and learn to read.

You didn't infer correctly, it's well documented at this point. Man up and move on; the Obama admin inherited a mess and people (rightfully) don't blame him for it. Simple, straight-forward. I can see how a lesser person wouldn't understand this. I'm not surprised you didn't, in hindsight.

The Obama admin had 2 years of a democrat-controlled Congress before Obama even got elected, something that the idiots blaming Bush are blissfully ignorant of, and that includes you. The only thing to infer here is your lefty bias, and your pathetic denial attempts of such.

Keep the bullshit retorts to a minimum, as the deflections are getting far too numerous to be all that entertaining at this point. Like I said, these are after-the-fact analysis so your continued inane assertion about estimates and models don't even come into the equation in much of this discussion.

It's not my problem if you can't read your own damn links, or you don't know the definition of the word "estimate" and "model." The fact that your numerous analysis sources don't even come to the same conclusion would tip off anyone with half a brain to the uncertainty of such analyses. But since you flunked English and take the opinions and guesstimates of econo-dolts as gospel, that doesn't include you, not surprisingly.

lmao, I've debunked zerohedge a number of times on their nonsense contrarian analysis, including on participation rate. I'm not sure what you believe you just linked to, but you'll have to explain it in your own words (you won't, because you can't, of course), as zerohedge has been well known to get all sorts of shit wrong, including just recently where they thought 1.2M people were removed from the labor force randomly in one month. Reality; new BLS census data adjusted the number. Drrrr.

It's already been explained to you in terms simple enough for a tard, read it slowly if you're still confused. Unless you plan on debunking this specific information with actual relevant evidence as opposed to an idiotic rant and false linking, then that's all the attention your so-called "debunk" deserves.

Also, I will still continue to cite the 9 studies on the stimulus' success you bitched out of responding to, as well as the reality that your bullshit Keating et al comparisons (pure theft) during the S&L crisis are not comparable to the 2008 financial crisis' circumstances or laws.

First you cite what you lied about citing for the last two weeks, and then you can whine about whatever else you allegedly cited.

I've work private industry since 18 (over a decade now), never worked in academia other than actually being educated there. My loans are minimal and I'll make a lot more than you over my lifetime. So yeah, I'll enjoy myself. I suggest going back to school if you want better pay and intellectual enlightenment.

Lmao, whatever helps you sleep at night. I already enjoy myself enough to not give a shit what you think.