lol, i gave all the ideal ecological answers and it said:
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.
lol, that means everyone needs to live like a freak
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.
lol, that means everyone needs to live like a freak
BOOO its a scam
I did everything as low as poissible
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.
I did everything as low as poissible
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.
They say I use 4 Acres of shelter which is a wrong. My house is on a quarter arche. Furthermore, 7 people live in it so that has to mean something. 4 arches? They must think because its a 2500+ Sq ft. house that it has massive ammounts of land.
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: Isla
1.7 planets for me, and I think I live pretty darn well.
super hippy
Nope, just smart.
I teach at a school I can walk to... a choice I made because I didn't want to sit in traffic for hours on end. When I first started teaching, I spent 8 hours a week driving to work! Not worth it.
My husband is an efficiency freak (electrical engineering did that to him) and made our house very energy efficient.
And because I don't want my family to be fat and unhealthy, we don't eat a lot of meat or processed foods. I shop for fresh, local goods as much as possible.
One of the nice side effects is that even though I'm closer to 40 than to 30, most people are suprised to find out that I am over thirty at all. Not a bad trade off for being environmentally thoughtful!
Originally posted by: Isla
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: Isla
1.7 planets for me, and I think I live pretty darn well.
super hippy
Nope, just smart.
I teach at a school I can walk to... a choice I made because I didn't want to sit in traffic for hours on end. When I first started teaching, I spent 8 hours a week driving to work! Not worth it.
My husband is an efficiency freak (electrical engineering did that to him) and made our house very energy efficient.
And because I don't want my family to be fat and unhealthy, we don't eat a lot of meat or processed foods. I shop for fresh, local goods as much as possible.
One of the nice side effects is that even though I'm closer to 40 than to 30, most people are suprised to find out that I am over thirty at all. Not a bad trade off for being environmentally thoughtful!
you're a chick? :Q
:camera:s
Whoozyerdaddy
Lifer
- Jun 27, 2005
- 19,216
- 1
- 61
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 5.9 PLANETS.
If everyone lived like me, hell would be a crowded place.
If everyone lived like me, hell would be a crowded place.
Originally posted by: JoeKing
Originally posted by: Isla
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: Isla
1.7 planets for me, and I think I live pretty darn well.
super hippy
Nope, just smart.
I teach at a school I can walk to... a choice I made because I didn't want to sit in traffic for hours on end. When I first started teaching, I spent 8 hours a week driving to work! Not worth it.
My husband is an efficiency freak (electrical engineering did that to him) and made our house very energy efficient.
And because I don't want my family to be fat and unhealthy, we don't eat a lot of meat or processed foods. I shop for fresh, local goods as much as possible.
One of the nice side effects is that even though I'm closer to 40 than to 30, most people are suprised to find out that I am over thirty at all. Not a bad trade off for being environmentally thoughtful!
you're a chick? :Q
:camera:s
LOL, yes I am. And the mother of 3.
Me on my 37th birthday a few months ago, no makeup on, after partying all day on a catamaran in St Kitts (I'm the brunette).
And I don't care if anyone would hit it (or my sister, the blonde) or not!
So
Lifer
- Jul 2, 2001
- 25,923
- 17
- 81
Sadly, only 5.7 planets.
How do they define 'need'???
I mean is that, if everyone lived like you, we would use 5.7x the energy we use today (which means that 'need 5.7 planets' is very silly)
If it's the estimated capacity of the planet...how are they choosing the maximum energy output of the planet??
How do they define 'need'???
I mean is that, if everyone lived like you, we would use 5.7x the energy we use today (which means that 'need 5.7 planets' is very silly)
If it's the estimated capacity of the planet...how are they choosing the maximum energy output of the planet??
3.4 planets
I did it again with the worst case scenario (meaty 12 year old kid) and got 25 planets :Q
I did it again with the worst case scenario (meaty 12 year old kid) and got 25 planets :Q
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.8 PLANETS
Pretty cool
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.8 PLANETS
Pretty cool
HardcoreRobot
Lifer
- Nov 7, 2000
- 16,403
- 3
- 81
JulesMaximus
No Lifer
- Jul 3, 2003
- 74,584
- 984
- 126
Yes but what I meant was think of the material in and needed to make what you own/ consume............
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter