Ebert's review of Sex and the City 2, fun read. :)

[irishScott]

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100525/REVIEWS/100529986

Some of these people make my skin crawl. The characters of "Sex and the City 2" are flyweight bubbleheads living in a world which rarely requires three sentences in a row. Their defining quality is consuming things. They gobble food, fashion, houses, husbands, children, vitamins and freebies. They must plan their wardrobes on the phone, so often do they appear in different basic colors, like the plugs you pound into a Playskool workbench.

As we return to the trivialities of their lives for a sequel, marriage is the issue. The institution is affirmed in an opening sequence at a gay wedding in Connecticut that looks like a Fred Astaire production number gone horribly over budget. There's a 16-man chorus in white formal wear, a pond with swans, and Liza Minnelli to perform the ceremony. Her religious or legal qualifications are unexplained; perhaps she is present merely as the patron saint of gay men. After the ceremony, she changes to a Vegas lounge outfit and is joined by two lookalike backups for a song and dance routine possibly frowned upon in some denominations.

Then it's back to the humdrum married life of our gal Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker) and the loathsome Mr. Big (Chris Noth). Carrie, honey, how can you endure life with this purring, narcissistic, soft-velvet idiot? He speaks loudly enough to be heard mostly by himself, his most appreciative audience. And he never wants to leave the house at night, preferring to watch classic black-and-white movies on TV. This leads to a marital crisis. Carrie thinks they should talk more. But sweetheart, Mr. Big has nothing to say. At least he's provided you with a Manhattan apartment that looks like an Architectural Digest wet dream.

Brief updates. Miranda Hobbes (Cynthia Nixon) is a high-powered lawyer who is dissed by her male chauvinist pig boss. Samantha Jones (Kim Cattrall) is still a sexaholic slut. Charlotte York (Kristin Davis) has the two little girls she thought she wanted, but now discovers that they actually expect to be raised. Mothers, if you are reading, run this through your head. One little girl dips her hands in strawberry topping and plants two big handprints on your butt. You are on the cell to a girlfriend. How do you report this? You moan and wail out: "My vintage Valentino!" Any mother who wears her vintage Valentino while making muffin topping with her kids should be hauled up before the Department of Children and Family Services.

All of this is pretty thin gruel. The movie shows enterprise, and flies the entire cast away to the emirate of Abu Dhabi, where the girls are given a $22,000-a-night suite and matching Maybachs and butlers, courtesy of a sheik who wants to have a meeting with Samantha and talk about publicity for his hotel.

This sequence is an exercise in obscenely conspicuous consumption, in which the girls appear in so many different outfits they must have been followed to the Middle East by a luggage plane. I don't know a whole lot about fashion, but I know something about taste, and these women spend much of the movie dressed in tacky, vulgar clothing. Carrie and Samantha also display the maximum possible boobage, oblivious to Arab ideas about women's modesty. There's more cleavage in this film than at a pro wrestler's wedding.

And crotches, have we got crotches for you. Big close-ups of the girls themselves, and some of the bulgers they meet. And they meet some. They meet the Australian world cup team, for example, which seems to have left its cups at home. And then there's the intriguing stranger Samantha meets at the hotel, whose zipper-straining arousal evokes the fury of an offended Arab guest and his wife. This prodigy's name is Rikard Spirt. Think about it.

Samantha is arrested for kissing on the beach, and there's an uncomfortable scene in which the girls are menaced by outraged men in a public market, where all they've done is dress in a way more appropriate for a sales reception at Victoria's Secret. They're rescued by Arab women so well covered only their eyes are visible, and in private these women reveal that underneath the burkas they're wearing Dior gowns and so forth. Must get hot.

I wondered briefly whether Abu Dhabi had underwritten all this product placement, but I learn the "SATC2" was filmed in Morocco, which must be Morocco's little joke. That nation supplies magnificent desert scenes, achieved with CGI, I assume, during which two of the girls fall off a camel. I haven't seen such hilarity since "Abbott and Costello in the Foreign Legion."

The movie's visual style is arthritic. Director Michael Patrick King covers the sitcom dialogue by dutifully cutting back and forth to whoever is speaking. A sample of Carrie's realistic dialogue in a marital argument: "You knew when I married you I was more Coco Chanel than coq au vin." Carrie also narrates the film, providing useful guidelines for those challenged by its intricacies. Sample: "Later that day, Big and I arrived home."

Truth in reviewing: I am obliged to report that this film will no doubt be deliriously enjoyed by its fans, for the reasons described above. Male couch potatoes dragged to the film against their will may find some consolation. Reader, I must confess that while attending the sneak preview with its overwhelmingly female audience, I was gob-smacked by the delightful cleavage on display. Do women wear their lowest-cut frocks for each other?

Note: From my understanding of the guidelines of the MPAA Code and Ratings Administration, Samantha and Mr. Spirt have one scene that far, far surpasses the traditional MPAA limits for pumping and thrusting.

 

[SandEagle]

cliffs?

 

[Locut0s]

cliffs?

It Sucks.

 

[Gooberlx2]

cliffs?

Shitty, shallow movie where the women are overwhelmed with any complications beyond coffee, fashion and dicks.

Sad men being dragged along by their SOs should get a good display of cleavage from the other women in the theatre.

 

[SandEagle]

It Sucks.

thanks. sums it up pretty nicely

 

[AndroidVageta]

Funny...but hes just too damn old fashioned...bitching about cleavage? Really?

 

[God Mode]

He's a angry and bitter man.

 

[Locut0s]

He's a angry and bitter man.

?? Are you talking about Ebert?

He's a kind and incredibly courageous man. A far better human being than 95% of the people on this planet and far far better than you if you are really being serious about this comment.

 

[God Mode]

?? Are you talking about Ebert?

He's a kind and incredibly courageous man. A far better human being than 95% of the people on this planet and far far better than you if you are really being serious about this comment.

All I know is that hes a movie critic. Other than that, I couldn't care less about him.

 

[irishScott]

Funny...but hes just too damn old fashioned...bitching about cleavage? Really?

He's not bitching, just noticing and making an observation; and he's not that old fashioned. Last I checked Ebert was the one who mentioned "gratuitous nudity" was something largely missing from modern Hollywood and that it should be brought back.

 

[biggestmuff]

TLDR

Does he have it on youtube

 

[irishScott]

All I know is that hes a movie critic. Other than that, I couldn't care less about him.

Well pay more attention. He's one of the few celebrities who actually deserves the attention and respect they get. /Gibbs slaps God Mode

 

[AndroidVageta]

tldr

does he have it on youtube

ytfl

 

[Locut0s]

All I know is that hes a movie critic. Other than that, I couldn't care less about him.

Wow way to stereotype / generalize. Personally I really like reading good movie reviews, yes there are a lot of crappy reviewers out there but there are also a lot of writers who are genuinely very talented. Ebert is widely recognized for his writing talent (we won a Pulitzer). But I accept you don't like movie critics. But to label someone as angry and bitter just because of what they do is FAIL.

BTW he has been diagnosed with cancer and game close to death multiple times during risky surgeries. They removed just about his entire lower jaw to prevent the cancer from coming back and he has since lost his ability to speak but continues to write reviews. He is extremely up beat and most people agree is a very kind and courageous person. His blog posts are often inspirational to read.


Before and after pic of illness/surgery:

 

[God Mode]

Well pay more attention. He's one of the few celebrities who actually deserves the attention and respect they get. /Gibbs slaps God Mode

I see nothing notable about his life on wikipedia. I assure you that he lived a more pampered life and there are many other important non-celeb people that endured worse.

In the context of the OP and Eberts comments about movies, I stand by my original comment that he seems angry and bitter. I dislike people that criticize things that they don't like and it is especially damaging if a person with influence such as Ebert does so.

 

[Locut0s]

I see nothing notable about his life on wikipedia. I assure you that he lived a more pampered life and there are many other important non-celeb people that endured worse.

In the context of the OP and Eberts comments about movies, I stand by my original comment that he seems angry and bitter. I dislike people that criticize things that they don't like and it is especially damaging if a person with influence such as Ebert does so.

Even if they are a MOVIE CRITIC?

 

[irishScott]

I see nothing notable about his life on wikipedia. I assure you that he lived a more pampered life and there are many other important non-celeb people that endured worse.

In the context of the OP and Eberts comments about movies, I stand by my original comment that he seems angry and bitter. I dislike people that criticize things that they don't like and it is especially damaging if a person with influence such as Ebert does so.

Lol take it easy man. You could apply your first comment to the vast majority of the Western World. Doesn't mean there aren't people worthy of respect and whose opinions should be listened to, especially with a track record like Ebert's. He's written plenty of glowing reviews, and while I don't always agree with his opinions (sometimes to the point of polar opposites) in general his reviews are fair, honest, rational and unbiased. This is rare among critics, many of whom are just angry bitter people who want nothing else than to get their big mouth listened to.

As for not liking people who criticize, what the fu... you do realize the hypocrisy there right? You've criticized me and Ebert in this thread. I assume you don't like yourself then?

 

[Soundmanred]

I dislike people (like myself) that criticize things that they don't like (like movie critics).

Good to know.

 

[DangerAardvark]

Shitty, shallow movie where the women are overwhelmed with any complications beyond coffee, fashion and dicks.

Sad men being dragged along by their SOs should get a good display of cleavage from the other women in the theatre.

I like this review better.

 

[bunnyfubbles]

Funny...but hes just too damn old fashioned...bitching about cleavage? Really?

learn how to read

"Reader, I must confess that while attending the sneak preview with its overwhelmingly female audience, I was gob-smacked by the delightful cleavage on display. Do women wear their lowest-cut frocks for each other?"

His criticism of cleavage in the film isn't that its unwelcome, its that its overused and/or out of place.

 

[God Mode]

All I see here is a bunch of fans that hate on anyone that dislikes their celebrities. I think my stated dislike for people like Ebert is justified even though it seems hypocritical. I don't care to explain my reasoning further other than that his stature in life gives him power to ruin so many others.

 

[zinfamous]

Ebert is the man.

Though, this isn't as good as his Transformers 2 review.

 

[God Mode]

Even if they are a MOVIE CRITIC?

Yes. I see no worth in movie critics since it is fucking entertainment. All I know is that influence from people like him kills creativity and diversity. Why am I getting the rabid fanboy negativity when I just did the same thing to him that he did to others throughout his career?

 

[mjrpes3]

Ebert is a funny guy. He uses old fashion words like cleavage in a sentence then in another calls it boobage.

 

[zinfamous]

All I see here is a bunch of fans that hate on anyone that dislikes their celebrities. I think my stated dislike for people like Ebert is justified even though it seems hypocritical. I don't care to explain my reasoning further other than that his stature in life gives him power to ruin so many others.

haha. He doesn't ruin anyone. This flick will still make a shit-ton of money. Plenty of shitty movies still make a shit-ton of cash, despite the opinions of informed reviewers. The shitty actors in these shitty movies will still have successful careers.

Hell, your very statement simply reflects the common public sentiment that the opinion of critics have very little influence on the bottom line.

I don't know why you even waste your breath, honestly.

:hmm: