• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ebay find of the day: Driving gurus need apply

All wheel drive huh? Guess I'll bid on this thing, seeing as how I could use it in the snow!

Personally though... Lambo's don't impress me the way an Aston Martin does. Still a nice ride nonetheless.
 
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.
 
I was never impressed with those cars looks...

Performance is grade A, but I like the new Lambo's much better.
 
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Are you speaking of the Lamborghini's one would see in "Rain Man"?
 
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

2.5 seconds actually for the Veyron :Q
 
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Why can't i appreciate it? I wasn't alive in the 60's and i appreciate muscle cars; and I was alive in the '80's. Also the Ford Gt will do 0-60 in 3.6 seconds according to Road&Track, and that car only has 550 HP, the Ferrari F430 is about the same with 493 HP. I realize the problem is gearing, but acceleration is more important than a 255 mph top speed.
 
Originally posted by: AmericanRebel
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Why can't i appreciate it? I wasn't alive in the 60's and i appreciate muscle cars; and I was alive in the '80's. Also the Ford Gt will do 0-60 in 3.6 seconds according to Road&Track, and that car only has 550 HP, the Ferrari F430 is about the same with 493 HP. I realize the problem is gearing, but acceleration is more important than a 255 mph top speed.

the Ford GT has much better traction than the F430...

to create any car that accelerates that quickly is amazing...
 
Originally posted by: AmericanRebel
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Why can't i appreciate it? I wasn't alive in the 60's and i appreciate muscle cars; and I was alive in the '80's. Also the Ford Gt will do 0-60 in 3.6 seconds according to Road&Track, and that car only has 550 HP, the Ferrari F430 is about the same with 493 HP. I realize the problem is gearing, but acceleration is more important than a 255 mph top speed.
Have you ever even been in a car that can do 0-60 in 3 seconds? You wouldn't be bitching about the acceleration then, let me tell ya... shees... :roll:
 
Originally posted by: AmericanRebel
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Why can't i appreciate it? I wasn't alive in the 60's and i appreciate muscle cars; and I was alive in the '80's. Also the Ford Gt will do 0-60 in 3.6 seconds according to Road&Track, and that car only has 550 HP, the Ferrari F430 is about the same with 493 HP. I realize the problem is gearing, but acceleration is more important than a 255 mph top speed.
What's your point?
My point is that you saying 3.2 second 0-60 isn't impressive is a crock of bullsh!t.
Acceleration is more important than top speed in certain circumstances. You can't say in any concrete manner that acceleration is more important than top speed. Even suggesting that means you're a cluebag.

If you're a stop light raceboi like most people on this forum than sure, accelration is important. No matter which way you cut it, 0-60 in around 3 seconds is TOP FVCKING NOTCH, period.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: AmericanRebel
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Why can't i appreciate it? I wasn't alive in the 60's and i appreciate muscle cars; and I was alive in the '80's. Also the Ford Gt will do 0-60 in 3.6 seconds according to Road&Track, and that car only has 550 HP, the Ferrari F430 is about the same with 493 HP. I realize the problem is gearing, but acceleration is more important than a 255 mph top speed.
Have you ever even been in a car that can do 0-60 in 3 seconds? You wouldn't be bitching about the acceleration then, let me tell ya... shees... :roll:


I have actually had that pleasure, in a car owned by a buddy of mine, a 1978 Canaro with a nitroused big block that runs a 10.45 quarter mile and it is quite entertaining. I never said it wasn't fast, merely that it could be faster for the power that car generates.
 
Originally posted by: SampSon
Originally posted by: AmericanRebel
Originally posted by: SampSon
That is one incredibly badass car.
If you weren't alive in the 80s and 90s you will have no appreciation for the diablo.

Thw acceleration isn't that great for a 750 HP car
You seriously need to stfu. The Bugatti Veyron does 0-60 in about 3 second. It has 1001 bhp.

Why can't i appreciate it? I wasn't alive in the 60's and i appreciate muscle cars; and I was alive in the '80's. Also the Ford Gt will do 0-60 in 3.6 seconds according to Road&Track, and that car only has 550 HP, the Ferrari F430 is about the same with 493 HP. I realize the problem is gearing, but acceleration is more important than a 255 mph top speed.
What's your point?
My point is that you saying 3.2 second 0-60 isn't impressive is a crock of bullsh!t.
Acceleration is more important than top speed in certain circumstances. You can't say in any concrete manner that acceleration is more important than top speed. Even suggesting that means you're a cluebag.

If you're a stop light raceboi like most people on this forum than sure, accelration is important. No matter which way you cut it, 0-60 in around 3 seconds is TOP FVCKING NOTCH, period.

I never said it wasn't impressive. And yes, top speed can be more important than acceleration, but I doubt you could find a track or a street where you could reach 255 MPH in that car.
 
Back
Top