• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Easter Question

erickj92

Banned
Do you think the finding of Jesuses bones will eliminate easter???

Edit: ok, lets say that they did find jesuses bones, then will they get rid of easter, im not saying that they exist or that they will ever find them, its kinda a "what if" question...
And to let all of you know, i do belive in Jesus
 
Originally posted by: erickj92
Do you think the finding of Jesuses bones will eliminate easter???

No. Because Jesuses bones don't exist.

Therefore, they cannot be found. They don't exist. FACT.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: erickj92
Do you think the finding of Jesuses bones will eliminate easter???

No. Because Jesuses bones don't exist.

Therefore, they cannot be found. They don't exist. FACT.

? Not sure how you came up with that one.
But whether the bones of Jesus exist or not doesn't matter.
Even if we did find HIS bones, we would have no way of knowing they were his over anyone elses, or at least no way to prove they were his.
 
Unless they're glowing with holiness, no-one will ever buy that a particular set of bones are Jesus'.
 
No. That's the thing about religious texts. People take them literally, and as long as there's a snowball's chance in hell that they're right, they'll believe it regardless.

I believe in Jesus, but indisputable findings (ie If they can prove that said bones are Jesus's) would alter my perception of the Bible greatly.
 
You'll never find them, because JeeZus rose from the dead, and moved to America...where he spread enlightenment amongst the savages here...or some off-beat variation of that, according to the Mormons...😉
 
Originally posted by: irishScott
No. That's the thing about religious texts. People take them literally, and as long as there's a snowball's chance in hell that they're right, they'll believe it regardless.

I believe in Jesus, but indisputable findings (ie If they can prove that said bones are Jesus's) would alter my perception of the Bible greatly.


There will never be enough proof to sway the faith of most Christians. Most religions rely on this sort of blind faith to keep going.
 
Originally posted by: RollWave
Originally posted by: irishScott
No. That's the thing about religious texts. People take them literally, and as long as there's a snowball's chance in hell that they're right, they'll believe it regardless.

I believe in Jesus, but indisputable findings (ie If they can prove that said bones are Jesus's) would alter my perception of the Bible greatly.


There will never be enough proof to sway the faith of most Christians. Most religions rely on this sort of blind faith to keep going.

Most people who choose to ignore Jesus call people intelligent enough to recognize absolute truth, blind believers.

Weird how that works huh?
 
Originally posted by: RollWave
Originally posted by: irishScott
No. That's the thing about religious texts. People take them literally, and as long as there's a snowball's chance in hell that they're right, they'll believe it regardless.

I believe in Jesus, but indisputable findings (ie If they can prove that said bones are Jesus's) would alter my perception of the Bible greatly.


There will never be enough proof to sway the faith of most Christians. Most religions rely on this sort of blind faith to keep the coffers full.

Fixed

 
:laugh:

But no, of course it wouldn't, although I understand what you're trying to get at, it's easy to get around.

Hell, with God on your side, you can word your way around anything. 😉
 
Back
Top