• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

E8400 vs q6600

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: tallman45
lots of great info here

Now if you decide on 4 cores, then it is the Q9450, buying a Q6600 will cost you more in a year than the Q9450 would

??

@ Newegg, the Q9450 is at least $130 more expensive.
 
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: tallman45
lots of great info here

Now if you decide on 4 cores, then it is the Q9450, buying a Q6600 will cost you more in a year than the Q9450 would

??

@ Newegg, the Q9450 is at least $130 more expensive.



Most likely talking about power consumption.

 
Originally posted by: Drsignguy
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: tallman45
lots of great info here

Now if you decide on 4 cores, then it is the Q9450, buying a Q6600 will cost you more in a year than the Q9450 would

??

@ Newegg, the Q9450 is at least $130 more expensive.



Most likely talking about power consumption.

Speaking of which...

Suppose electricity costs $0.15/kwh
Suppose your PC draws, on average, 250w at the wall
Suppose you leave your PC on 24/7/365

You pay $0.90/day to run your PC
You pay $27/month to run your PC
You pay $328.50/year to run your PC

How much would the Q6600 vs E8400 (or Q9450) figure into this?
 
Back
Top