• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

E8400 runs p95 for 3 hours at 100C tjmax

Tempered81

Diamond Member

realtemp author Unclewebb performed the tests. prochot is initiated. cpu continues to operate while throttling down in order to keep away from thermal junction max.

He basically ran his overclocked, overvolted e8400 with no fan, and let the temp immediately rise to 100c and stay there for 3 hours while stress testing. It seems that if youre going to damage your cpu, 9 times out of 10 it will be voltage, and not temperature. Awesome processors by intel.

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/276/hote8400fw5.png
 
LOL I thought I should back my vCore off because I was hitting 80 on all 4 cores while running OCCT Linpack. It error'd anyways. I cut back to 3.8 and drop vCore... re-running Linpack now and it's only getting to 71.

That guy is a crazy mofo, somebody should thank him for being nice enough to show us what would happen.
 
Intel chips were able to do that since the first P4s so not really a supprise there. I would not have done it with a cpu i'd like to keep for a while though.
 
So, does running my E2140s at 9C away from TJmax count as stress-testing too?

Like I said, I'm not afraid of temps. Hitting TJmax does NOT kill your proc.

(Just make sure that TM2 is ENABLED in BIOS. Disabling that is BADBADBAD. Chip will overheat and NOT thermal-throttle back down. Don't ask me how I know that.)
 
I had a Q6600 that ran at 9x400 stock voltage with stock cooler hitting 124C with Prime and it would NOT crash or shut off! Let it run for three hours and shut it down when something started smelling funny.
 
Interesting. I managed to kill two Core 2 CPUs (an E6600 and a Q6600) with mild voltages and decent temps over the past two years or so.
 
The higher the temperature the lower you need to have the voltages (to keep it safe). Or rather, with lower voltages, you can run the CPU at a higher temp without risk of damaging it.
 
Originally posted by: Rubycon
I had a Q6600 that ran at 9x400 stock voltage with stock cooler hitting 124C with Prime and it would NOT crash or shut off! Let it run for three hours and shut it down when something started smelling funny.

What were you running the system in? An oven? :Q
 
Originally posted by: lopri
Interesting. I managed to kill two Core 2 CPUs (an E6600 and a Q6600) with mild voltages and decent temps over the past two years or so.

Interesting........

If you are in voltage spec, even with an increase over the VID, it should last 3+ years easy...
 
Originally posted by: lopri
Interesting. I managed to kill two Core 2 CPUs (an E6600 and a Q6600) with mild voltages and decent temps over the past two years or so.

Let me guess...nForce chipset?
 
My first E6600 died on P5W-DH. I believe the E6600 was from one of the first production batches (but not an ES). Admittedly I literally tortured the CPU for the first two months (like, Prime95 running 20 hours a day) but max vCore I gave was 1.55V (1.52V after droop). It ran great @3.6GHz for a few weeks, then it started degrading. Once it failed @3.6GHz, it wouldn't sustain 3.5GHz shortly after, then from there on it was a downhill pretty quickly. I tried to improve cooling (I turned my room to an igloo) but it didn't help. It stopped working while I was playing with Quicktime video - screen black-out, fans running, etc. At the time of death, it was @3.3GHz. And eventually the board died, too, the following week. I am not sure which one killed which, but I didn't mind much because I was in awe of the performance of Conroe at the time. I forgot about it rather quickly. I remember at least two other users reporting wrt degrading Conroe sometime after, however.

On the other hand, Q6600 was a totally different story. It took a while for me to figure it out.. and much aggravation. It's a long story but the max vCore I gave was 1.40V (possibly 1.42V) and temp was rarely over 60C (lapped TRUE FTW). Let me just say that the whole episode contributed to my general disrespect towards MCM quad-cores. 😀

Oh and despite all the misery I went through with 680i, I don't think it is directly responsible for the Q6600's death. (Though I can't be 100% certain because I had used like 4 different boards until I finally learned of the CPU gone bad)
 
so, if i have my q6600 @ 1.45vCore & 3.8ghz and temps reach 100c (according to speedfan), my cpu will automatically throttle down in speed? to what speed?
 
Originally posted by: Rubycon
I had a Q6600 that ran at 9x400 stock voltage with stock cooler hitting 124C with Prime and it would NOT crash or shut off! Let it run for three hours and shut it down when something started smelling funny.

Possibly the motherboard?
 
Back
Top