- Aug 17, 2000
- 517
- 0
- 0
I was told that the E6850 would be better for gaming over the Q6600. Is this true? Tried to google a comparison but the one I found was in Italian.
Sorry to hear about your poor searching skills.Originally posted by: lilbabimac
I was told that the E6850 would be better for gaming over the Q6600. Is this true? Tried to google a comparison but the one I found was in Italian.
Originally posted by: Blain
Sorry to hear about your poor searching skills.Originally posted by: lilbabimac
I was told that the E6850 would be better for gaming over the Q6600. Is this true? Tried to google a comparison but the one I found was in Italian.
@ Default speed...
Quake 4 (E6850) = :thumbsup:
F.E.A.R. (E6850) = :thumbsup:
Company Of Heroes (E6850) = :thumbsup:
Supreme Commander (Q6600) = :thumbsup:
Lost Planet: Extreme Condition using "Concurrent Operations" (Q6600) = :thumbsup:
Prey (E6850) = :thumbsup:
Serious Sam 2 (E6850) = :thumbsup:
Unreal Tournament 2004 (Q6600) = :thumbsup:
Warhammer Mark Of Chaos (E6850) = :thumbsup:
3DMark06 Graphics (Q6600) = :thumbsup:
Premiere Pro 2.0 (Q6600) = :thumbsup:
We then cranked up the resolution to 1920 x 1200, and increased the world detail slider up to 5 to give us a more realistic situation for this clock speed comparison.
Originally posted by: RIFLEMAN007
stock for stock, most games would run faster on the E6850 because it runs @ a higher stock speed. But what Q6600 can't hit 3ghz on stock voltage? You get the same speed with 2 extra cores easy as pie.