• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

e6400 or e6600

M

MiranoPoncho

Golden Member
What, if any benifits other than cache and overclockability, would one gain from getting a 6600 instead of a 6400 or vice versa?
 
Umm... as far as I can tell, those are the major benefits.

The E6600 has the 4MB of L2 cache as opposed to the 2MB for the E6400; they both appear to be brilliant overclockers.
 
Originally posted by: AyashiKaibutsu
It's obvious, but the e6600 is clocked higher at stock too : )
Click to expand...

I believe the e6600 has a higher multi and that they both share the same FSB. Could be wrong though.
 
the E6600 has 4MB cache which helps but it's also higher priced look at the new review on anandtech comparing the lower core 2 duo processors

I think the sweetspot in for conroe is the E6600 just because it has 4MB cache and overclocks nicely along with the rest of the core 2 duo processors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top