E3110/E8400 - 500x8?

Broadwater

Junior Member
Feb 20, 2008
13
0
0
What kind of luck are you guys having getting this thing to 4GHz using a 500MHz FSB and 8x multiplier rather than a 445MHz FSB and a 9x multiplier?
 

ShadowFlareX

Member
May 6, 2008
150
0
0
I may not have E3110/E8400, but i'm sure there's hardly any that can hit 500FSB stable or for 24/7 use. Besides, there's minimal gain between 500 x 8 and 445 x 9.
 

Scottae

Member
Jan 19, 2008
127
0
0
I noticed much better Memory bandwidth results with 500x8 over ~445 x9 on my Q6600 but those are just benchmarks real world performance... well they are both damn fast.
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: Scottae
I noticed much better Memory bandwidth results with 500x8 over ~445 x9 on my Q6600 but those are just benchmarks real world performance... well they are both damn fast.

Scotty, that is one hell of an OC. Care to share some details?
 

Zapper48

Member
Oct 7, 2007
167
0
0
Originally posted by: Scottae
I noticed much better Memory bandwidth results with 500x8 over ~445 x9 on my Q6600 but those are just benchmarks real world performance... well they are both damn fast.


Exactly. I use 1.375 in bios for 4.0ghz.Raised NB a bit for 2x2 gb sticks.SB was upped a notch too.I know it's got more headroom but 4.0 is plenty for gaming,yeah and wicked fast too.

 

Sylvanas

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2004
3,752
0
0
As AT has mentioned many times in reviews, higher multiplier and lower FSB is generally better than high FSB low multiplier as high FSB straps are often to the detriment of performance as the TrD / Performance level latencies are raised much higher than need be.
 

Broadwater

Junior Member
Feb 20, 2008
13
0
0
Well, I got my E3110 to 500x8 with total stability.
With room temperature at 24C core 0 runs at a max of 58C while core 1 stays around 54C.