Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
That would be my guess. You are chock full of windows 7 questions today eh?
Originally posted by: yusux
what's the diff between 7 and Vista
Originally posted by: lavaheadache
guess what? If you disable UAC there is no UAC annoyaces. UAC was only put in there to protect the average dumbass pc user, How may of those do you suppose there are? Hence why UAC created =) I am excited about windows 7 even though I believe Vista has been bashed unprovacetively.
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: yusux
what's the diff between 7 and Vista
7 is what Vista was supposed to be, and actually probably has fewer bugs.
It's faster and less annoying. They fixed the major annoyances with UAC. It boots fast. Programs load up instantly. It doesn't have the problems with disk performance.
Basically I use it daily now. It's better than XP and Vista.![]()
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Turn off UAC and no more annoyances. I'm reluctant to jump on Windows 7 because I don't want to see some of the apps I have just flat out not run and drivers not work properly.
We will see.
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Wow this is very good news, can't wait for Windows 7 to be released![]()
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: yusux
what's the diff between 7 and Vista
7 is what Vista was supposed to be, and actually probably has fewer bugs.
It's faster and less annoying. They fixed the major annoyances with UAC. It boots fast. Programs load up instantly. It doesn't have the problems with disk performance.
Basically I use it daily now. It's better than XP and Vista.![]()
Originally posted by: clandren
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: yusux
what's the diff between 7 and Vista
7 is what Vista was supposed to be, and actually probably has fewer bugs.
It's faster and less annoying. They fixed the major annoyances with UAC. It boots fast. Programs load up instantly. It doesn't have the problems with disk performance.
Basically I use it daily now. It's better than XP and Vista.![]()
but... it still has the ugly vista look![]()
Originally posted by: gersson
Originally posted by: lavaheadache
guess what? If you disable UAC there is no UAC annoyaces. UAC was only put in there to protect the average dumbass pc user, How may of those do you suppose there are? Hence why UAC created =) I am excited about windows 7 even though I believe Vista has been bashed unprovacetively.
UAC is actually a good idea. I don't use it yet because of rivatuner but I would if I could.
It helps minimize damage to the OS by preventing unauthorized changes to your OS.
Say you are drawing something with paint and then suddenly you get a UAC prompt...Something's not right. Not only are you warned about there being possible spyware, adware on your PC but you've also prevented it from running (hopefully).
Windows 7 lets you specify that programs you choose to run should be allowed -- a good refinement to Window's Vista's UAC.
Originally posted by: chizow
Also seems like a lot of people gushing over Win7 haven't used Vista extensively or at all based on some of the comments.
Originally posted by: chizow
Sounds like you need to install DX9 first, which isn't surprising as the DX9 runtime wasn't included with Vista either, although it is surprising that MS is still not including it Win7. Also seems like a lot of people gushing over Win7 haven't used Vista extensively or at all based on some of the comments.
Heheh ya, seems that way at least. Vista certainly had its problems at launch, but I've been very happy with it as well for over a year. MS has clearly done a better job marketing Win7 though, and the open Beta is certainly a big step in improving adoption/acceptance when it goes RTM.Originally posted by: SunnyD
Win7 = Microsoft's Mohave. :laugh:
Honestly, I had absolutely no problems with Vista for nearly 2 years now. Win7 is pretty much the same, just need to get used to the new taskbar.
Of course I look at it, and it really isn't any different than NT 4.0. The only things that really have changed with each iteration (in terms of functionality) are the icons, and explorer/taskbar/start menu. Everything else has been the same for the last ~15 years.
Windows 7 is more than just marketing. There have been measurable improvements to performance, memory footprint and disk access over Vista.Originally posted by: chizow
MS has clearly done a better job marketing Win7 though, and the open Beta is certainly a big step in improving adoption/acceptance when it goes RTM.
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: chizow
Sounds like you need to install DX9 first, which isn't surprising as the DX9 runtime wasn't included with Vista either, although it is surprising that MS is still not including it Win7. Also seems like a lot of people gushing over Win7 haven't used Vista extensively or at all based on some of the comments.
Win7 = Microsoft's Mohave. :laugh:
Honestly, I had absolutely no problems with Vista for nearly 2 years now. Win7 is pretty much the same, just need to get used to the new taskbar.
Of course I look at it, and it really isn't any different than NT 4.0. The only things that really have changed with each iteration (in terms of functionality) are the icons, and explorer/taskbar/start menu. Everything else has been the same for the last ~15 years.
Me too.Originally posted by: nemesismk2
For the first time since Windows XP I am starting to get optimistic about upgrading from Windows XP
No true - Windows 7?s UAC is configurable beyond a simple on/off switch.Originally posted by: Mem
I agree,infact UAC is the same in Win7 as in Vista,
