nitromullet
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2004
- 9,031
- 36
- 91
The spin Fudzilla has put on this article is interesting... If you read it again, you will notice that what Fud is actually saying is that FC2 has a DX10.1 path AND that ATI is releasing a hotfix driver that is supposed to improve FC2 performance. They seem to want the reader to correlate the two together, but the two don't actually appear to be related (at least not yet)...
If you look at: http://support.ati.com/ics/sup...ledge&questionID=38664
It clearly says:
Based on this, I'm guessing that this hotfix simply has some FC2 specific optimizations in Catalyst AI, and doesn't really have anything to do with DX10.1. It looks like the hotfix is for DX9 as well. Besides why would ATI need to put out a specific hotfix for 10.1 when their hardware already supports it?
Based on this site's benchmarks http://www.pcgameshardware.com...CPU_benchmarks/?page=3 it already looks like the 4870 X2 will beat a GTX 280 in FC2 benchmarks as it is, so it looks like Fud is just trying to stir things up for no reason.
If you look at: http://support.ati.com/ics/sup...ledge&questionID=38664
It clearly says:
This hotfix
* Improves performance for the DirectX 9 version of Far Cry 2 on CrossFire? compatible systems
* Improves performance for the DirectX 10 version of Far Cry 2 on both single and CrossFire? compatible systems
Based on this, I'm guessing that this hotfix simply has some FC2 specific optimizations in Catalyst AI, and doesn't really have anything to do with DX10.1. It looks like the hotfix is for DX9 as well. Besides why would ATI need to put out a specific hotfix for 10.1 when their hardware already supports it?
Based on this site's benchmarks http://www.pcgameshardware.com...CPU_benchmarks/?page=3 it already looks like the 4870 X2 will beat a GTX 280 in FC2 benchmarks as it is, so it looks like Fud is just trying to stir things up for no reason.