DVI cable vs RCA on HDTV

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,890
31,988
136
Just bought a Samsung 30" widescreen HDTV from Circuit City. It's a standard tube TV for the bedroom. It has a DVI connection along with RCA (analog). How much difference in picture quality is there between the two? The DVI cable at the store cost $129. I didn't buy it yet.:confused:
 

tigerbait

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2001
5,155
1
0
if by RCA, you are talking about component video input (uses 3 RCA-style connections to provide video), then just use that... there isn't much advantage to using DVI on an analog tube HD-monitor like that, unless your source box requires DVI to output full HD resolution. Definitely don't spend $130 on a DVI cable.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
You can find DVI cables for $20.

That said tigerbait is right, on a tube monitor it really doesn't matter much, just use component. DVI will be good for copy-protected stuff like HD DVD.
 

SaltBoy

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
8,975
11
81
eBay is your best source for DVI cables. DVI cables are DVI cables.
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Pick up a DVI cable online, you'll use it eventually.

DVI is great for things like:

Connection to a PC
Using upconverting DVD players
Playing copy protected media

Besides, you might as well use it if you have it.

On a 30" CRT display you're not likely to see any difference but you might as well use it.

If nothing else it leaves a set of component inputs open for something else (HD Cable, DVD player, etc.).

Viper GTS
 

Jeraden

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,518
1
76
DVI will give you the best picture quality, as there is no signal degredation between the source and the tv. Component is often times indistinguishable, but it does have the potential to not be quite as sharp. Just think of it like hooking up an LCD monitor, DVI and VGA look similar, but DVI is usually at least a tad sharper.

Yeah, don't spend that much on a DVI cable. Unless you are running long distances, pretty much any DVI cable should work. If you have to go a long long ways, like 20ft or so, then you might want to get a good quality shielded cable, as you can have some signal dropoff at that length with cheap cables, which will result in "green sparklies" in the image - which is bits of data that are getting lost.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
Originally posted by: Jeraden
DVI will give you the best picture quality, as there is no signal degredation between the source and the tv. Component is often times indistinguishable, but it does have the potential to not be quite as sharp. Just think of it like hooking up an LCD monitor, DVI and VGA look similar, but DVI is usually at least a tad sharper.
Not necessarily, especially in cheap HDTVs that skimp on parts. Some of the DVI inputs in those TVs are worse than component.

 

woowoo

Platinum Member
Feb 17, 2003
2,092
1
0
Originally posted by: Jeraden
DVI will give you the best picture quality, as there is no signal degredation between the source and the tv. Component is often times indistinguishable, but it does have the potential to not be quite as sharp. Just think of it like hooking up an LCD monitor, DVI and VGA look similar, but DVI is usually at least a tad sharper.
I want some of what your smoking....
 

Jeraden

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,518
1
76
Originally posted by: woowoo
Originally posted by: Jeraden
DVI will give you the best picture quality, as there is no signal degredation between the source and the tv. Component is often times indistinguishable, but it does have the potential to not be quite as sharp. Just think of it like hooking up an LCD monitor, DVI and VGA look similar, but DVI is usually at least a tad sharper.
I want some of what your smoking....

Whats wrong with what I said?
 

Jeraden

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,518
1
76
To answer all your DVI questions:
http://www.digiupdate.com/G002_DVI_HDMI_and_HDCP.html

Noteable quote:
It was a surprise to us, and it is a surprise to most people when they first experience a DVD played back through a DVI connection. "Jaw dropping" is the phrase often used, and it describes our reaction. Except in our case we had no prior clue - so it contained shock and confusion as well. It seemed almost high definition. There are hundreds of reactions like mine in this forum, and now there are reviews in many publications attesting to the phenomenal quality difference. See DVI Quotes.

Why is that? DVI is not magically adding quality to your signal, it is Component that has been degrading the signal ? we just didn?t how badly.

Component: When you use a component connection, your original digital signal is converted to analog, then it is sent over to the TV and becomes susceptible to noise, then it is converted back to digital by the TV. This dual conversion introduces conversion artifacts, plus the transmission can pick up noise.

DVI: In a DVI connection, the original digital signal is passed to the TV digitally in its original pristine condition.

In the past, when you had poor quality input signal and a poor fidelity TV, you could get by with component connections. Now you have high quality inputs (HD, PC or DVD) and high fidelity digital TVs (even CRT HDTV?s are digital in this context), so the component connection makes no sense. DVI is the only sensible option.

Indeed it is our opinion that HDTV without DVI is an oxymoron. Why go through all the trouble of creating an expensive digital setup, generating a high quality digital signal into a high fidelity digital display, if you are going to throw the analog Component monkey wrench into it.

And until you've switched to DVI, don't look for other culprits for video artifacts - clay faces, dithering, motion artifacts, etc. Find out first how many are actually introduced by your component connection.
 

piroroadkill

Senior member
Sep 27, 2004
731
0
0
Originally posted by: Jeraden
Originally posted by: woowoo
Originally posted by: Jeraden
DVI will give you the best picture quality, as there is no signal degredation between the source and the tv. Component is often times indistinguishable, but it does have the potential to not be quite as sharp. Just think of it like hooking up an LCD monitor, DVI and VGA look similar, but DVI is usually at least a tad sharper.
I want some of what your smoking....

Whats wrong with what I said?

Absolutely nothing, you were correct.