Duterte: Just When You Thought It Couldn't Get Any Worse

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...keep-shrugging-it-off/?utm_term=.23568cb15453

Duterte keeps admitting to killing people. His supporters keep shrugging it off.

It should have been a shocking admission.

On Monday, Rodrigo Duterte, president of the Philippines, bragged about killing people. He said that when he was a city mayor, he used to hunt suspects on his motorcycle, shooting people on the spot. The goal, he said, was to encourage police officers to do the same.

“In Davao, I used to do it personally. Just to show to the [police] that if I can do it, why can’t you?” he said.

“I [would] go around in Davao with a motorcycle … and I would just patrol the streets and looking for trouble also. I was really looking for an encounter to kill,” he said.


This was not the first time that Duterte appeared to admit to murder — nor would it be the first time his supporters dismissed his remarks. On Wednesday, Vitaliano Aguirre II, his justice secretary, said that the president “exaggerated” and that although Duterte said he went “looking” to kill, he actually “must have been forced.”

All of this fits a pattern: Duterte calls for killing alleged criminals and then denies a personal or government role. It's a strategy that helped get him elected and that keeps him popular as his self-proclaimed “war on drugs” claims thousands more.

To understand why a sitting president might admit to murder, consider that Duterte has done all of this before. During his two-decade tenure as the mayor of Davao, a city in the southern Philippines, he earned the nickname “the death squad mayor” because of the teams of hit men that stalked the streets, shooting petty criminals and government critics.

When rights groups investigated him, he claimed he played no role. But when he ran for president, he promised to replicate the Davao model on a national scale. His government would “kill all” the criminals; there would be death and death and death, he said, until the fish “grow fat” from feeding on their bodies.

This apocalyptic vision has proved popular. Having weathered colonial plunder, a kleptocratic dictator, and then rule by a corrupt and feudalistic elite, many Filipinos see him as a savior, the type of leader who would bleed the system clean.

People are also incredibly fed up with rampant crime in their communities, and they do not think the country's overburdened and inefficient courts can deliver the justice they crave.

Since Duterte took power June 30, at least 5,900 people have been killed in his "war on drugs." The police say that 2,086 were shot dead in raids and that 3,841 were gunned down “vigilante-style” by unknown attackers.

Independent reporting on police operations in the “war” has found troubling inconsistencies and strong evidence of excessive use of force. The government claims these “vigilante-style” killings are out of its control, but a recent Washington Post investigation found one such killing was actually staged by high-ranking cops — a dark echo of the “death squad” days.

International condemnation has done little to stop the violence. Local critics rightly fear speaking out.

Duterte is promising more death in 2017. We can't be shocked when he delivers.



This Duterte guy is quite interesting in that he appears to be far more popular than Trump, while simultaneously being an even more awful human being.


I wonder if there is anything preventing the US from getting to this level of authoritarian police-state insanity. To a country where anybody can be murdered by anyone on the mere suggestion that they were a drug dealer. If you keep giving police authority and worshipping machismo and autocratic rule you get the Phillipines.
 
Last edited:

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
I guess my question would be: Is this the logical conclusion of Trumpism? Is Duterte the UberTrump? He literally brags about driving around murdering strangers like he's playing GTA V or something, but he's totally serious.


Where does a nation's moral compass have to go to where summary execution of anyone carrying drugs is an acceptable crime fighting technique? How far is it from a nation who's moral compass finds it acceptable to shoot a black man running away in the back for having back child support payments?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,766
6,335
126
We'll find out. I suspect there are still enough obstacles in the way to prevent such a thing, but Trump is a loose cannon.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,491
16,966
136
When trump said he could shoot someone and his supporters wouldn't care, do you think he was being hyperbolic? I don't and the posters on this board have shown how exactly this level of irrationality happens. It starts with echoing a growing sentiment of a large minority of people. You then constantly reinforce that while deriding the press and any opposition. Once your supporters buy into that you pretty much have total control over them and they will explain away anything you do including changing the very institutions that were created to guard against such a person.

History is full of such instances and humans have always been susceptible to the snake oil salesman.


Those that do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.