Duron socket A vs Celeron socket 370 CPUs

Link19

Senior member
Apr 22, 2003
971
0
0
Well, I know that Intel CPUs generally run cooler than AMD CPUs, but does the same apply for the budget CPUs being the Duron and Celeron? I'm looking into a Duron because it is much easier to underclock because it doesn't have the locked multiplier and I want to run it fanless. Would underclocking a Duron CPU significantly lower the operating temperature of it as opposed to it running at its rated stock speed? I'm looking to run it fanless with only a heatsink. I guess now to finalize my question, would it be almost as easy to keep a Duron cool as it would be to keep a Celeron cool?


Suggestions greatly appreciated
 

FishTankX

Platinum Member
Oct 6, 2001
2,738
0
0
Pre P4, intel just ran cooler, end of story. The celeron would produce infinitley less heat, *espically* if it's a .13 micron celeron. Those can easily be passivley cooled with a little undervolting/clocking, which is *alot* more than I can say for the duron.
 

Dennis Travis

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,076
1
81
If you are talking about the PIII type Coppermine Celerons, they run a lot cooler than the Duron but the Duron performs better in every test I have ran and seen. I have a Celeron 633 and is very cool in compairson to a Duron 600 I built for a friend for Internet and Word Processing. You should be able with a good HS to get away with no fan.

In sumary, Durons perform better but PIII Celerons run cooler.

 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Have you checked out the www.SilentPCReview.com forums? Lots of quiet people posting there.

If you are only doing playback, a Tualatin Celeron 1.0A - 1.2 might be ideal since they're much faster than the Cyrix CPUs while running reasonably cool, and you might be able to underlock them from 100 MHz down to 66 MHz. I would guess a 1.2A at 800 MHz would run cooler than a coppermine at 800 MHz, but the low FSB might really hurt performance.

Another choice is a real P3 at 700 - 866 MHz instead of a coppermine celeron at 800 MHz. The extra cache and higher FSB made a P3 733 (with 133 FSB) as fast as a celeron 800 in most benchmarks if I recall correctly.

Finally, if you don't insist on passive, you can get near-silent HSFs from people like zalman (if you can find anyone still selling HSFs for socket 370).
 

Link19

Senior member
Apr 22, 2003
971
0
0
Would I have any chance of being able to run a Celeron 800MHz at stock speed and keep it cool enough without a fan? WOuld a Cooler Master socket A and socket 370 heatsink with the fan removed be enough to keep a Celeron 800MHz at stock speed cool?
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
In my experience, I've found a Zalman flower-type cooler can cool any S370 processor with only case airflow assistance.

- M4H