• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dullard's College Football Week 10

dullard

dullard

Elite Member
I'll be working 80+ hours per week for as long as I can see. Thus I can't spend much time on this. Lots of upsets last week, my program didn't do too well (same goes for pretty much anyone's rankings). I perseonally think my program over-rates Arizona St and under-rates Wisconsin (although Wisconsin has made a slow and steady climb week after week).

Big movers up: California, Auburn, Texas, UCLA, Texas Tech
Big movers down: Miami FL, Texas A&M, Florida St, Purdue

Sciencewhiz, thanks for the link last week, I just saw it today, and maybe I'll get around to looking at it this weekend.

Place : Win Rating / Score Rating ( W , L ) Team name
01 : 68.6 / 72.7 ( 8 , 0 ) Southern Cal
02 : 64.9 / 64.6 ( 8 , 0 ) Oklahoma
03 : 64.2 / 72.0 ( 6 , 1 ) California
04 : 61.2 / 63.5 ( 8 , 0 ) Utah
05 : 59.3 / 57.4 ( 6 , 2 ) Arizona St
06 : 58.7 / 60.3 ( 9 , 0 ) Auburn
07 : 58.3 / 58.5 ( 7 , 1 ) Texas
08 : 58.1 / 56.6 ( 6 , 1 ) Miami FL
09 : 57.4 / 52.5 ( 7 , 1 ) Tennessee
10 : 56.8 / 57.7 ( 7 , 1 ) Georgia
11 : 55.6 / 51.6 ( 8 , 0 ) Boise St
12 : 54.1 / 54.1 ( 6 , 2 ) Florida St
13 : 54.1 / 53.9 ( 6 , 2 ) Texas A&M
14 : 53.1 / 49.7 ( 8 , 0 ) Wisconsin
15 : 52.8 / 50.7 ( 8 , 1 ) Michigan
16 : 52.7 / 54.1 ( 6 , 2 ) Oklahoma St
17 : 52.0 / 58.3 ( 5 , 1 ) Louisville
18 : 50.6 / 51.3 ( 6 , 1 ) Virginia
19 : 48.7 / 48.7 ( 6 , 2 ) LSU
20 : 48.3 / 47.7 ( 7 , 1 ) West Virginia
21 : 47.1 / 45.6 ( 6 , 2 ) Iowa
22 : 46.0 / 50.4 ( 5 , 3 ) UCLA
23 : 45.6 / 46.9 ( 5 , 3 ) Notre Dame
24 : 45.3 / 45.1 ( 5 , 3 ) Texas Tech
25 : 44.3 / 41.8 ( 6 , 2 ) UTEP
26 : 43.7 / 46.5 ( 6 , 2 ) Virginia Tech
27 : 43.6 / 37.0 ( 7 , 1 ) Navy
28 : 43.4 / 49.4 ( 5 , 3 ) Purdue
29 : 43.2 / 36.8 ( 5 , 1 ) Southern Miss
30 : 42.4 / 45.6 ( 5 , 3 ) South Carolina
31 : 42.3 / 37.7 ( 5 , 2 ) Alabama-Birmingham
32 : 42.3 / 42.6 ( 5 , 3 ) Oregon
33 : 42.3 / 42.8 ( 4 , 4 ) Oregon St
34 : 41.9 / 35.3 ( 4 , 4 ) North Carolina
35 : 41.8 / 40.8 ( 5 , 3 ) Ohio State
36 : 41.4 / 40.1 ( 4 , 4 ) Brigham Young
37 : 40.9 / 47.5 ( 3 , 4 ) Arkansas
38 : 40.5 / 45.7 ( 5 , 3 ) Alabama
39 : 40.5 / 38.6 ( 4 , 4 ) Colorado
40 : 40.4 / 45.7 ( 4 , 4 ) Stanford
41 : 40.0 / 43.4 ( 6 , 3 ) Minnesota
42 : 39.3 / 40.5 ( 5 , 2 ) Boston College
43 : 39.1 / 39.7 ( 5 , 4 ) New Mexico
44 : 39.1 / 36.8 ( 4 , 4 ) Northwestern
45 : 38.9 / 37.2 ( 5 , 3 ) Nebraska
46 : 38.7 / 36.3 ( 5 , 3 ) Wyoming
47 : 38.1 / 36.1 ( 4 , 4 ) Clemson
48 : 37.9 / 45.8 ( 4 , 4 ) Florida
49 : 37.5 / 39.6 ( 4 , 3 ) Fresno St
50 : 37.1 / 38.4 ( 4 , 4 ) North Carolina St
51 : 36.5 / 33.0 ( 4 , 4 ) Iowa St
52 : 36.5 / 34.8 ( 5 , 2 ) Pittsburgh
53 : 36.4 / 33.1 ( 4 , 3 ) Georgia Tech
54 : 36.4 / 40.4 ( 4 , 4 ) Missouri
55 : 35.7 / 28.7 ( 4 , 4 ) Louisiana Tech
56 : 35.4 / 38.5 ( 4 , 4 ) Michigan St
57 : 35.3 / 38.3 ( 4 , 4 ) Maryland
58 : 35.2 / 31.7 ( 5 , 2 ) Memphis
59 : 34.6 / 35.1 ( 3 , 5 ) Air Force
60 : 34.3 / 35.0 ( 7 , 2 ) Northern Illinois
61 : 34.2 / 39.5 ( 6 , 2 ) Bowling Green
62 : 34.2 / 32.2 ( 4 , 4 ) Syracuse
63 : 33.6 / 33.7 ( 5 , 3 ) Connecticut
64 : 33.6 / 36.7 ( 3 , 5 ) Kansas St
65 : 33.4 / 35.2 ( 3 , 5 ) Colorado St
66 : 33.3 / 37.2 ( 3 , 5 ) Kansas
67 : 32.9 / 35.3 ( 3 , 5 ) Washington St
68 : 31.5 / 30.9 ( 3 , 5 ) Mississippi
69 : 31.4 / 30.2 ( 4 , 4 ) Cincinnati
70 : 31.3 / 33.3 ( 4 , 4 ) Wake Forest
71 : 31.2 / 34.6 ( 4 , 4 ) Troy St
72 : 30.3 / 33.8 ( 5 , 3 ) Marshall
73 : 29.8 / 23.6 ( 3 , 5 ) Baylor
74 : 29.5 / 25.4 ( 4 , 4 ) TCU
75 : 29.4 / 19.9 ( 4 , 4 ) North Texas
76 : 28.8 / 29.8 ( 3 , 5 ) Indiana
77 : 28.8 / 27.7 ( 6 , 2 ) Toledo
78 : 27.6 / 25.9 ( 4 , 4 ) Rutgers
79 : 27.3 / 27.1 ( 2 , 6 ) UNLV
80 : 26.6 / 29.4 ( 5 , 3 ) Miami OH
81 : 26.5 / 24.2 ( 3 , 4 ) Hawai`i
82 : 25.8 / 25.8 ( 3 , 5 ) Mississippi St
83 : 25.1 / 33.2 ( 2 , 6 ) Penn St
84 : 25.0 / 18.6 ( 3 , 5 ) New Mexico St
85 : 25.0 / 29.5 ( 2 , 6 ) San Diego St
86 : 24.8 / 22.3 ( 4 , 4 ) Middle Tenn St
87 : 24.6 / 29.7 ( 1 , 7 ) Arizona
88 : 23.1 / 19.2 ( 2 , 4 ) South Florida
89 : 22.9 / 25.3 ( 2 , 6 ) Vanderbilt
90 : 22.6 / 21.1 ( 2 , 6 ) Houston
91 : 21.9 / 20.9 ( 3 , 5 ) Rice
92 : 21.3 / 13.9 ( 3 , 5 ) UL-Monroe
93 : 21.2 / 22.1 ( 1 , 7 ) Washington
94 : 21.1 / 15.4 ( 2 , 5 ) East Carolina
95 : 21.1 / 16.5 ( 4 , 4 ) UL-Lafayette
96 : 21.0 / 19.7 ( 4 , 4 ) Nevada
97 : 20.7 / 21.6 ( 2 , 6 ) Tulsa
98 : 20.4 / 23.6 ( 2 , 7 ) Illinois
99 : 19.7 / 17.6 ( 2 , 5 ) Army
100 : 18.0 / 14.3 ( 4 , 4 ) Akron
101 : 18.0 / 12.2 ( 2 , 6 ) Utah St
102 : 17.2 / 21.4 ( 1 , 7 ) Kentucky
103 : 17.1 / 13.7 ( 2 , 6 ) Arkansas St
104 : 16.7 / 12.7 ( 2 , 5 ) Tulane
105 : 15.2 / 17.4 ( 1 , 7 ) Duke
106 : 14.0 / 7.1 ( 1 , 7 ) SMU
107 : 13.1 / 10.9 ( 3 , 5 ) Central Michigan
108 : 12.8 / 8.9 ( 2 , 5 ) San Jos? St
109 : 11.6 / 5.6 ( 2 , 7 ) Idaho
110 : 10.8 / 11.6 ( 1 , 7 ) Temple
111 : 10.4 / 15.7 ( 2 , 6 ) Kent St
112 : 10.3 / 14.1 ( 3 , 6 ) Ohio U.
113 : 9.0 / 8.1 ( 3 , 5 ) Eastern Michigan
114 : 5.4 / 6.9 ( 1 , 8 ) Ball St
115 : 2.8 / 3.9 ( 0 , 8 ) Central Florida
116 : 0.2 / 3.6 ( 1 , 7 ) Western Michigan
117 : 0.0 / 0.0 ( 1 , 7 ) Buffalo
 
Division I-AA

Place : Score Rating' ( W , L ) Team name
01 : 84.3 ( 8 , 1 ) Georgia Southern
02 : 79.0 ( 8 , 1 ) Southern Illinois
03 : 75.4 ( 7 , 1 ) Sam Houston St
04 : 74.6 ( 7 , 0 ) Harvard
05 : 73.4 ( 7 , 1 ) Cal Poly SLO
06 : 73.3 ( 6 , 1 ) Florida Atlantic
07 : 73.3 ( 6 , 2 ) Furman
08 : 73.2 ( 6 , 3 ) Villanova
09 : 73.2 ( 7 , 1 ) James Madison
10 : 72.9 ( 6 , 3 ) Eastern Washington
11 : 71.9 ( 6 , 1 ) Pennsylvania
12 : 71.7 ( 6 , 2 ) New Hampshire
13 : 70.8 ( 6 , 2 ) Delaware
14 : 70.3 ( 6 , 2 ) Montana
15 : 70.2 ( 6 , 2 ) William & Mary
16 : 69.3 ( 7 , 1 ) Lehigh
17 : 68.3 ( 4 , 4 ) Hofstra
18 : 67.9 ( 4 , 4 ) Maine
19 : 65.5 ( 6 , 2 ) Montana St
20 : 65.4 ( 6 , 2 ) Western Kentucky
21 : 64.0 ( 4 , 4 ) Northern Iowa
22 : 63.9 ( 6 , 1 ) Jacksonville St
23 : 63.4 ( 4 , 4 ) Portland St
24 : 62.6 ( 7 , 1 ) Hampton
25 : 62.2 ( 3 , 5 ) Northeastern
 
Originally posted by: dullard
I perseonally think my program over-rates Arizona St and under-rates Wisconsin (although Wisconsin has made a slow and steady climb week after week).
Click to expand...

Well, Arizona St definetly has the best schedule of the 2 loss teams. Sagarin has them pretty high as well. I do find it suprising that Boise is ahead of Wisconsin.
 
As usual, all I can say is.....

Fear the Utah machine

NC, who they totally spanked, just put the hurt on Miami.

I'm predicting a #5 ranking for Utah when the BCS is released today.
 
Originally posted by: AgentEL
yay. go bears. I agree with the Arizona St. overrated-ness.
Click to expand...

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
 
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
There's a huge difference between USC and Cal and the rest of the teams.
Click to expand...

you bet

ok has been pretty good, i have only watched em couple of times

the usc-cal game was 1 of the best college football games i have ever seen, and to be honest i think usc was really really lucky (and ofcourse great on defenes in the last series),

its only speculation but i think cal would beat wisconsin (not easily), not sure about auburn, since i have not seen them play all year, but i assume they are good because sec is a tough conference.
 
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: AgentEL
yay. go bears. I agree with the Arizona St. overrated-ness.
Click to expand...

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

I see what you're saying, but Wisconsin and Auburn didn't have to play #1 USC.
 
Originally posted by: AgentEL
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: AgentEL
yay. go bears. I agree with the Arizona St. overrated-ness.
Click to expand...

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

I see what you're saying, but Wisconsin and Auburn didn't have to play #1 USC.
Click to expand...

And Auburn and Wisco don't have losses either. Auburn has played Tenn, LSU, plays UGA in a week, and has only one game to where they won by less than three touchdowns. I watched CAL vs. USC, and both are good if not great teams, but a loss is a loss. The rest of the Pac-10 is not comparable to the strength of the Big 10 or SEC, IMO.
 
Originally posted by: arod
You were way too leniant on Texas A&M..... we shoulda dropped atleast 20 spots.
Click to expand...

Its still in line with the BCS computers. Everyone overlooked the A&M loss because of the FSU and Miami upsets.
 
Guess I'll be advocating for Auburn now that my team is (rightfully) out of things. IMO if they win out they should be ranked #2 at the end of the season. The schedules of Wisc, Utah, and Boise just don't compare. They aren't as overrated as TCU was last year before losing to USM, but if they wanted a chance to be ranked higher they should have picked some tougher opponents for their out of conference games.
 
Originally posted by: Mill

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

Why should Wisconsin be rated ahead of Utah?
 
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: Mill

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

Why should Wisconsin be rated ahead of Utah?
Click to expand...

Because the Big 10 is a real conference?
 
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: Mill

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

Why should Wisconsin be rated ahead of Utah?
Click to expand...

Why because Wisconsin bitch slapped the then #5 team in the country right after beating the #15 ranked team. Where as Utah only beat a then unranked A&M who went on to win 6 straight before losing to Baylor. If this happened in a "normal", ie: OSU not sucking, year Wisconsin would be in the top 3.
 
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Why because Wisconsin bitch slapped the then #5 team in the country right after beating the #15 ranked team. Where as Utah only beat a then unranked A&M who went on to win 6 straight before losing to Baylor. If this happened in a "normal", ie: OSU not sucking, year Wisconsin would be in the top 3.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the laugh. I always find it so funny when people brag that their team beat some team that isn't even ranked anymore. "But, but, but they were overranked when we played them, thus we must be good."

If your biggest opponent is CURRENTLY in the "others receiving votes category, then you haven't played anyone yet". Previous rankings are meaningless. Just like those Fresno State people bragging about beating Washington earlier in the year. Used-to-be-a-good-team is meaningless.
 
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: Mill

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

Why should Wisconsin be rated ahead of Utah?
Click to expand...

Conference. I think Utah might have a tougher non-conference schedule, but their Conference schedule can't compare, and the Big 10 is even having an off year.
 
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Why because Wisconsin bitch slapped the then #5 team in the country right after beating the #15 ranked team. Where as Utah only beat a then unranked A&M who went on to win 6 straight before losing to Baylor. If this happened in a "normal", ie: OSU not sucking, year Wisconsin would be in the top 3.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the laugh. I always find it so funny when people brag that their team beat some team that isn't even ranked anymore. "But, but, but they were overranked when we played them, thus we must be good."

If your biggest opponent is in the "others receiving votes category, then you haven't played anyone yet".
Click to expand...

Im not a Wisconsin fan, I am a humilated A&M fan. Uh, no I wouldnt say Purdue was over ranked when they played Wisconsin, but who the hell has Utah played? Uh, no one other than a team that loses to Baylor.
 
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: Mill

I don't think any one loss team should be ranked ahead of Wisco or Auburn. Perhaps Utah, because Cal is really good, but they still have a loss.
Click to expand...

Why should Wisconsin be rated ahead of Utah?
Click to expand...

Conference. I think Utah might have a tougher non-conference schedule, but their Conference schedule can't compare, and the Big 10 is even having an off year.
Click to expand...

how would you rank the conferences this year?


would you rate pac 10 above big 10?

edit: wanted to ask dullard 😱
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top