• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

dude jailed for teabagging lsu fan

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Ns1 said:
this.


In college when we teabagged someone it was always with clothes on and I'm not even sure we ever actually made contact with someone's face. And finally, it was always to people we actually knew.
Click to expand...

I am in no way defending the act of "teabagging" but by your own description you never teabagged anyone.
 
Puppies04 said:
I am in no way defending the act of "teabagging" but by your own description you never teabagged anyone.
Click to expand...

We all knew what "real" teabagging was. None of us were stupid enough to actually pull our scrotum out.

Even with pants on, when my crotch is 1" away from your face, you know you're being teabagged.

/LOLcollege
 
Ns1 said:
We all knew what "real" teabagging was. None of us were stupid enough to actually pull our scrotum out.
Click to expand...

Thank God there are still decent human beings on these forums. Big difference between joking about doing it and really doing it.
 
Ns1 said:
We all knew what "real" teabagging was. None of us were stupid enough to actually pull our scrotum out.

Even with pants on, when my crotch is 1" away from your face, you know you're being teabagged.

/LOLcollege
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't have a problem with that. No contact, no exposed genitalia = no molestation. Stick your scrotum into the mouth of a sleeping person = molestation.
 
dank69 said:
Once again, "molest" is open to interpretation.
Click to expand...

Yes, and the court's have agreed with the interpretation that sticking genitals onto/into the mouth of a person that cannot consent is sexual battery.

dank69 said:
derp derp
Click to expand...

Do you really think that previous post was a remotely rational argument? That when a person feels violated, it's because they're secretly afraid of enjoying it? Either you're a dumbass or have morals strikingly in line with the typical sexual predator.
 
HamburgerBoy said:
Yes, and the court's have agreed with the interpretation that sticking genitals onto/into the mouth of a person that cannot consent is sexual battery.
Click to expand...
Considering the guy was basically face down I doubt the genitals made any contact with the mouth much less entered his mouth in any way.



Do you really think that previous post was a remotely rational argument? That when a person feels violated, it's because they're secretly afraid of enjoying it? Either you're a dumbass or have morals strikingly in line with the typical sexual predator.
Click to expand...
No, that was a joke. Something you clearly do not understand.
 
HamburgerBoy said:
Yes, and the court's have agreed with the interpretation that sticking genitals onto/into the mouth of a person that cannot consent is sexual battery.



Do you really think that previous post was a remotely rational argument? That when a person feels violated, it's because they're secretly afraid of enjoying it? Either you're a dumbass or have morals strikingly in line with the typical sexual predator.
Click to expand...

Dude, it comes down to, do you think someone's hurt feelings (at worst) justify prison time?

A fair sentence would be an apology and a trip to a qualified dominatrix.
 
dank69 said:
Considering the guy was basically face down I doubt the genitals made any contact with the mouth much less entered his mouth in any way.

No, that was a joke. Something you clearly do not understand.
Click to expand...

Ok, I didn't watch the video because videos of sexual molestation do not appeal to me, but in that case I could see it being a relatively minor case of sexual molestation. But still molestation nonetheless.

How was that clearly a joke? A sarcastic remark, sure; I didn't think that you thought Apple of Sodom thought he would "catch teh gay". But at the same time, your post gave no indication of having any point other than belittling his point that unwilling genital contact was unacceptable to him.

SphinxnihpS said:
Dude, it comes down to, do you think someone's hurt feelings (at worst) justify prison time?
Click to expand...

I dunno. I guess so. The dude in the op should have been able to ejaculate on the unconscious guy's face too, provided he washed it with Cetaphil afterwards.
 
Last edited:
dank69 said:
Considering the guy was basically face down I doubt the genitals made any contact with the mouth much less entered his mouth in any way.



No, that was a joke. Something you clearly do not understand.
Click to expand...

Unwanted and uncustomary touching is assault & battery.

Touching someones body with your genitals is sexual, no matter where your genitals touch.

Its sexual assualt. You are completely and totally clueless. Your opinion doesn't matter. The guy got of fairly lightly.
 
teabagging4jeebus.jpg
 
Is teabagging a sex offender offense?

N/M saw someone said he wasn't required to register. Good to know I can continue to ....not teabag anyone.
 
Teabagging should only be done in online games. For a guy to actually teabag another is as homoish as it gets imo.
 
SphinxnihpS said:
Dude, it comes down to, do you think someone's hurt feelings (at worst) justify prison time?

A fair sentence would be an apology and a trip to a qualified dominatrix.
Click to expand...

Go up to some drunk woman in a bar and teabag her. All you did is hurt her feelings, so all you should have to do is apologize after the police show up.

Sad, how stupid some folks are here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top