• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dual Core and XP Home??

The major limitations of SMP have to do with software and operating system support. Many operating systems (such as Windows XP Home) are not SMP capable and will not make use of the second physical processor. Also, most modern programs are single-threaded, meaning that there is only ever one current set of linked instructions and data for them. This means that only one processor can effectively work on them at a time. Multi-threaded programs do exist, and can take better advantage of the potential power of dual- or multi-CPU configurations, but are not as common as we might like.
 
Originally posted by: Parasitic
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Yes, XP home supports dual cores 100%.


Really? Is there a patch?

You don't need a patch. Microsoft licenses by socket, not by core. A dual core is one socket. It works with XP home, and uses both cores, just like it does with hyprethreading. Windows XP home is fully SMP capable, just like XP pro. The differance is XP pro allows for 2 sockets, so with two dual cores, XP pro supports 4 cores.
 
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/highlights/multicore.mspx

Q. A customer wants to upgrade their single-core processor system by replacing the single-core processor with a multicore processor. If they do so, will there be an increase in cost for their current software license?

A. No. The customer will incur the cost for one software license per processor, not per core. So if a customer replaces the single-core processor on their system with a multicore processor, they will need to have only one license per processor.
 
Back
Top