I plan on doing a machine with lots of ram. So will it be worth it to skip sandy-bridge, so that I can get the quad channel support?
Yes, but not just for the reason of having four memory channels. Sandy Bridge CPUs that support quad-channel will be coming out in a new socket that support 8-core CPUs.Will it be significantly faster?
It will need to either be 4 or 8 slots. They use 6 slots on X58 because it's triple-channel. 6 slots on a quad-channel board makes no sense.And will it be 8 slots or still only 6 slots like on the current x58![]()
Hi.
This really depends on what you're doing with said system.
Yes, but not just for the reason of having four memory channels. Ivy Bridge CPUs that support quad-channel will be coming out in a new socket that support 8-core CPUs.
It will need to either be 4 or 8 slots. They use 6 slots on X58 because it's triple-channel. 6 slots on a quad-channel board makes no sense.
Helwo
Ok, I will be making an adobe machine essentially.
So you're saying,
quad channel is not faster than dual channel
and it "will" probably be 8 slots? or 4 slots?![]()
its not even a 4 way interlink if your thinking that.
There is no quad channel. Your thinking 2 dual channel which is still dual channel.
"Dual-channel-enabled memory controllers utilize two data channels."
The highest is tri channel, and the p67 systems went back to dual.
Well they stayed on dual is a better statement.
It will need to either be 4 or 8 slots. They use 6 slots on X58 because it's triple-channel. 6 slots on a quad-channel board makes no sense.
4 slots on a triple-channel board makes no sense either:It will need to either be 4 or 8 slots. They use 6 slots on X58 because it's triple-channel. 6 slots on a quad-channel board makes no sense.
Helwo
Ok, I will be making an adobe machine essentially.
So you're saying,
quad channel is not faster than dual channel
and it "will" probably be 8 slots? or 4 slots?![]()
Neither does 4 slots on a tri-channel board. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813121361