Dual Channel vs Quad Channel

ro3ruaayw

Banned
Jan 16, 2011
9
0
0
Helwo

I plan on doing a machine with lots of ram. So will it be worth it to skip sandy-bridge, so that I can get the quad channel support?

Will it be significantly faster?

And will it be 8 slots or still only 6 slots like on the current x58o_O


Thanx
 

IGemini

Platinum Member
Nov 5, 2010
2,472
2
81
Hi.

I plan on doing a machine with lots of ram. So will it be worth it to skip sandy-bridge, so that I can get the quad channel support?

This really depends on what you're doing with said system.

Will it be significantly faster?
Yes, but not just for the reason of having four memory channels. Sandy Bridge CPUs that support quad-channel will be coming out in a new socket that support 8-core CPUs.

And will it be 8 slots or still only 6 slots like on the current x58o_O
It will need to either be 4 or 8 slots. They use 6 slots on X58 because it's triple-channel. 6 slots on a quad-channel board makes no sense.
 
Last edited:

ro3ruaayw

Banned
Jan 16, 2011
9
0
0
Hi.



This really depends on what you're doing with said system.

Yes, but not just for the reason of having four memory channels. Ivy Bridge CPUs that support quad-channel will be coming out in a new socket that support 8-core CPUs.

It will need to either be 4 or 8 slots. They use 6 slots on X58 because it's triple-channel. 6 slots on a quad-channel board makes no sense.

Helwo

Ok, I will be making an adobe machine essentially.

So you're saying,

quad channel is not faster than dual channel

and it "will" probably be 8 slots? or 4 slots? :confused:
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Helwo

Ok, I will be making an adobe machine essentially.

So you're saying,

quad channel is not faster than dual channel

and it "will" probably be 8 slots? or 4 slots? :confused:

It will be faster but it depends on the program, and it can be 8 slot OR 4 slot.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,052
3,534
126
its not even a 4 way interlink if your thinking that.

There is no quad channel. Your thinking 2 dual channel which is still dual channel.
"Dual-channel-enabled memory controllers utilize two data channels."

The highest is tri channel, and the p67 systems went back to dual.
Well they stayed on dual is a better statement.
 
Last edited:

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
its not even a 4 way interlink if your thinking that.

There is no quad channel. Your thinking 2 dual channel which is still dual channel.
"Dual-channel-enabled memory controllers utilize two data channels."

The highest is tri channel, and the p67 systems went back to dual.
Well they stayed on dual is a better statement.

I think he was referring to socket 2011 which is said to be quad channel ;)
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,112
136
Helwo

Ok, I will be making an adobe machine essentially.

So you're saying,

quad channel is not faster than dual channel

and it "will" probably be 8 slots? or 4 slots? :confused:

Well, Adobe CS may have a large memory footprint, but generally speaking it's not a real bandwidth intensive app, AFAIK.

---------

The best thing for desktop users with quad channel ram is we can go with real low latency DDR3 and still have plenty of bandwidth (without needing > 1600MHz clocks).