• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DSLR To Possibly Assimilate 22K Computers!?!?

That's a big bite to chew. Imagine how that would affect the desktop imaging process and support issues? I doubt a company would do that without at least thinking of the consequences and doing small batches as tests.

And, unless it was TOTALLY invisible to them, the end users would be messing with it, checking out the stats, closing the app, etc. Just things to take away from their productivity.
 
I think it's a lot more wishful thinking than reality on their part...

But that's no excuse not to go out and do more, more, more! 😀
 
I saw that thread last night. I was pretty certain that its absolutely nothing to worry about.

As one poster there said, transferring 22k computers worth of work units every day is a LOT of bandwidth... Especially with large companies having to tighten their belts due to the current status of the economies I doubt they would feel willing to take on DC.
 
If I was in charge of that many machines they would do distributed computing, but in the name of the company that owns them.
That would put their name at or near the top of any list.
 
If I were that company I would start my own team and get credit under the corporate name rather than let an employee take credit. With that many computers they would surely standout out in the crowd!

I see the management of that size fleet as a full time job for more than one person, not to mention the network usage.

With 2 WU per day per machine it would take 173,148.15 Bytes per second of bandwidth just to download the 44,000 WUs needed. At 3 WUs per day the bandwidth requirements would be 259,722.22 Bytes per second, or just over 2 mbps, not counting overhead and returned results! Doesn't sound like this could ever happen!
 
LOL, could you imagine the first day at the DC forum for that user...

***Congrats to 22KMAN for 100 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 250 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 500 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 1000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 2500 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 5000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 10000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 20000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 25000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 30000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 40000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 50000 WU's!***
***Congrats to 22KMAN for 60000 WU's!***

And that's just their first day! :Q🙂😀
 
Hmmmmm, I think some of you know what I am thinking....... Might have to keep things "underground" for awhile.












SHUX
 
Folks, we came within a whisker of having 25,000 coming to work for us. But management chopped it off at the neck. The complexity of this type of assimilation is why we don't see them.

There has only been one situation that I am aware where an employee was given access to such power...and it was a very unusual case.

And as the politicians like to say, "No further comment." 😉

ehum, that was 25,000 computers. 😉
 
If you'll take a closer look on the thread, it's 38k computers. :Q

Looking on the numbers, to download 1 wu/day per computer equals 150KB/s.
2 wu/day is 300KB/s
3 wu/day is 450KB/s... I'm sorry, Berkeley timed out...


Taking a look at the current net-statistics for Seti@Berkeley, it's now average 26.64 Mbits/sec outgoing.
Since the limit is 30Mbits/sec an added 114k wu/day is too much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top