Drudge: TALK OF HILLARY EXIT ENGULFS CAMPAIGNS

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Big question: if Hillary losses the nomination does she stay in the Senate or does she retire?

Oh, I don't see here retiring. Not at all.

I suspect that the Clinton's see themselves as sort of like the Kennedy's - a political family dynasty. So, I don't see her retiring, a better bet IMO is that she models herself after Ted Kennedy - a career as a powerful long-lasting Senator (who has long ago given up hope for the Presidency).

My "big question" - if HRC can't get the nomination, would she accept the VP nomination from Obama?

She'd make history as the first female VP, and could run later, but this time with a "real" claim of experience.

Fern

I don't think she'd accept it. being a powerful senator > VP, and I think the senate is a pretty good place for Hillary. I think the comparison to Ted Kennedy in that regard is pretty good, and Teddy's probably done more over a longer time span as a senator than he could have done as a president.

but I don't think Obama would offer it, either. Obama needs someone with strong foreign policy experience to balance out his ticket... a Biden or a Richardson... or maybe a Wesley Clark? that would be an interesting way of making nice with the Clinton faction.

Richardson is by far the best VP, if he'd take it.

35 years of REAL experiance, a lot involving foreign policy. Hes a moderate that would temper the farther left Obama. I dont care if some people say its "too brown."
 

13Gigatons

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2005
7,461
500
126
Obama is the next Bill Clinton, someone who can balance the budget again and bring peace around the globe. Hillary is only famous for being Bill's wife which I resent.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Obama is the next Bill Clinton, someone who can balance the budget again and bring peace around the globe. Hillary is only famous for being Bill's wife which I resent.

The GOP Congress Balanced the budget... There was a time, back in the 1990s were GOP House members lead by Newt were fiscally conservative. It all went to hell when Hastert and Delay took over leadership of the House Republicans.
 

AliasX

Senior member
Jan 29, 2006
508
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
She'll stay in the Senate. And spin it as her getting out of the way for the first Black Man to become President. She'll be back.

It's too late for the Clinton legacy. Bill will now be written off as an inconsequential, scandal-ridden POTUS who governed between two War Presidents. Both named Bush.

She won't run again. She will be too old. Too old for women is younger than too old for men.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Obama is the next Bill Clinton, someone who can balance the budget again and bring peace around the globe. Hillary is only famous for being Bill's wife which I resent.

The GOP Congress Balanced the budget... There was a time, back in the 1990s were GOP House members lead by Newt were fiscally conservative. It all went to hell when Hastert and Delay took over leadership of the House Republicans.

Is that why we had record deficits under a GOP Congress after Clinton left? Maybe you aren't giving him enough credit for balancing the budget.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: teclis1023
It's too late for the Clinton legacy. Bill will now be written off as an inconsequential, scandal-ridden POTUS who governed between two War Presidents

Bill remains one of the most popular American Presidents of all time - he has only become more popular with Bush's inept leadership.
More likely Bush?s ineptness makes Bill?s time look that much better.

Bill was so popular in 2000 that his VP couldn?t win the election. (And if you are of the belief that Gore was cheated it still says a lot that the sitting VP during a time of peace and a good economy couldn?t win his own home state and could barely win the election 48.4% to 47.9%. Bush 41, also a sitting VP, creamed Dukakis in 1988 53% to 45%)

Clinton is going to go down in history as an unremarkable president who served during a 'boring' period of history. Nothing happened during Bill's term that will be talked about 20 years from now, except his personal problems and impeachment.

Gore lost because Gore distanced himself from Clinton in 2000, which was a strategic mistake, even he admits that.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Obama is the next Bill Clinton, someone who can balance the budget again and bring peace around the globe. Hillary is only famous for being Bill's wife which I resent.

The GOP Congress Balanced the budget... There was a time, back in the 1990s were GOP House members lead by Newt were fiscally conservative. It all went to hell when Hastert and Delay took over leadership of the House Republicans.

Is that why we had record deficits under a GOP Congress after Clinton left? Maybe you aren't giving him enough credit for balancing the budget.

It was the GOP that played hardball with Clinton, not vice versa. Who pushed for balanced budgets? Newt and the Republicans, not the Dems. Budgets come from the House, not the President. The GOP controlled the house, they are the ones that brought forth the balanced budget legislation. They failed to get their balanced budget amendment though.

Under Hastert, Delay and Bush the GOP has been a far different creature than when the party was lead by Newt.

 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Phokus
Gore lost because Gore distanced himself from Clinton in 2000, which was a strategic mistake, even he admits that.

I pointed this out in my Hillary thread but a certain lefty didn't want to hear it.
 

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
6,021
547
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: teclis1023
[...]Clinton is going to go down in history as an unremarkable president who served during a 'boring' period of history. Nothing happened during Bill's term that will be talked about 20 years from now, except his personal problems and impeachment.

I beg to differ, and so do 95% of the Serbs... the Kosovo war was a big blunder, and the embodiment of a repugnant and misguided foreign policy, which eerily echoed the film "Wag the Dog".
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Optimism for her being back, or pessimism, I think is unfounded. How many presidents have lost a campaign and come back to win? This is partly why Edwards is a stupid man, because he never understood he had no chance. He was a douchy putz running as VP and is a douchey putz now.

If Swillary exits, it's going to be mighty hard for Obama not to win the nomination.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Optimism for her being back, or pessimism, I think is unfounded. How many presidents have lost a campaign and come back to win? This is partly why Edwards is a stupid man, because he never understood he had no chance. He was a douchy putz running as VP and is a douchey putz now.

If Swillary exits, it's going to be mighty hard for Obama not to win the nomination.

If Obama win the nomination, the era of the Clintons controlling the Democratic Party are over. Their grip has slowly loosened over the years, but this will be the moment they lose all influence over the party.

 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Obama is the next Bill Clinton, someone who can balance the budget again and bring peace around the globe. Hillary is only famous for being Bill's wife which I resent.

The GOP Congress Balanced the budget... There was a time, back in the 1990s were GOP House members lead by Newt were fiscally conservative. It all went to hell when Hastert and Delay took over leadership of the House Republicans.

Is that why we had record deficits under a GOP Congress after Clinton left? Maybe you aren't giving him enough credit for balancing the budget.

It was the GOP that played hardball with Clinton, not vice versa. Who pushed for balanced budgets? Newt and the Republicans, not the Dems. Budgets come from the House, not the President. The GOP controlled the house, they are the ones that brought forth the balanced budget legislation. They failed to get their balanced budget amendment though.

Under Hastert, Delay and Bush the GOP has been a far different creature than when the party was lead by Newt.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. And WRONG.


The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (Pub.L. 101-508) included provisions requiring that legislation increasing spending or decreasing revenues be on a pay-as-you-go basis, or PAY-GO.

The Act set forth sequestration procedures to enforce pay-as-you-go requirements and deficit targets.

The Act authorized the President to invoke sequestration within 15 calendar days after the Congress ends a session to eliminate a budget-year breach within any category.

And most importantly - FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 475 - OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT OF 1990

Democrats Yeas-217 Nays-40
Republicans -- Yeas-10 Nays-163

Newt was a crook and a liar.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: 13Gigatons
Obama is the next Bill Clinton, someone who can balance the budget again and bring peace around the globe. Hillary is only famous for being Bill's wife which I resent.

The GOP Congress Balanced the budget... There was a time, back in the 1990s were GOP House members lead by Newt were fiscally conservative. It all went to hell when Hastert and Delay took over leadership of the House Republicans.

Is that why we had record deficits under a GOP Congress after Clinton left? Maybe you aren't giving him enough credit for balancing the budget.

It was the GOP that played hardball with Clinton, not vice versa. Who pushed for balanced budgets? Newt and the Republicans, not the Dems. Budgets come from the House, not the President. The GOP controlled the house, they are the ones that brought forth the balanced budget legislation. They failed to get their balanced budget amendment though.

Under Hastert, Delay and Bush the GOP has been a far different creature than when the party was lead by Newt.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. And WRONG.


The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (Pub.L. 101-508) included provisions requiring that legislation increasing spending or decreasing revenues be on a pay-as-you-go basis, or PAY-GO.

The Act set forth sequestration procedures to enforce pay-as-you-go requirements and deficit targets.

The Act authorized the President to invoke sequestration within 15 calendar days after the Congress ends a session to eliminate a budget-year breach within any category.

And most importantly - FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 475 - OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT OF 1990

Democrats Yeas-217 Nays-40
Republicans -- Yeas-10 Nays-163

Newt was a crook and a liar.

More revisionist history....

The Gramm-Rudman Act in the 1980s was the first aimed at balancing the budget. It was primarily supported by the GOP. The Act you call, altered this act by adding PayGo and doing away with fixed budget targets. The Budget wasnt balanced until 1998 after the passage of Balanced Budget Act of 1997. The vote?

Ayes
199 Republicans
44 Democrats

Nays
137 Democrats
8 Republicans.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Wreckem

More revisionist history....

You now join Pabs as a Legend in Your Own Mind.

When confronted with a factual criticism, deny the factual criticism and attack your opponent,

You are just plain wrong, bud.

and btw ...

Wreckem sez: ""Budgets come from the House, not the President.""

WRONG


The President of the United States submits a proposed budget each fiscal year which is subsequently reviewed, revised and voted on by the Congress.

The President may then sign the budget into law or veto the measure
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Wreckem

More revisionist history....

You now join Pabs as a Legend in Your Own Mind.

When confronted with a factual criticism, deny the factual criticism and attack your opponent,

You are just plain wrong, bud.

and btw ...

Wreckem sez: ""Budgets come from the House, not the President.""

WRONG

Do some research... You make yourself sound like a moron. You might want to start with the US Constitution. And then look at how much and how often Congress rips up the Presidents recommendations. Even when the GOP controlled the Congress, the still didnt follow Bush's budget recommendations, except on the war.

Might want to scroll up I added to my post. Care to refute it?
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Do some research... You make yourself sound like a moron.

What are you - like 12 years old? Do they not teach civics in your school system?

You deny the factual record of the Budget Act of 1990 which provided for PAYGO and federal debt reduction.

You deny the overwhelming Democratic majority in approving PAYGO.

You deny that the President submits a proposed budget each year.

Yes - You are a Legend In Your Own Mind.

 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Do some research... You make yourself sound like a moron.

What are you - like 12 years old? Do they not teach civics in your school system?

You deny the factual record of the Budget Act of 1990 which provided for PAYGO and federal debt reduction.

You deny the overwhelming Democratic majority in approving PAYGO.

You deny that the President submits a proposed budget each year.

Yes - You are a Legend In Your Own Mind.

The president submits recommendations. Recommendations Congress typically ignores.

And again, the act of 1990 merely altered the Gramm-Rudman act which also called for federal debt reduction and set fixed budgets. The act of 1990 didnt balance the budget.

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 balanced the budget. Look it up.

Everyone wants to credit the Dems and Clinton for the economy in the 1990s.

Besides the Dot.com boom, two acts by the GOP

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and the Tax Payers Relief Act of 1997 both contributed to the Economy. Both were overwhelmingly supported and sponsered by the GOP.

As for resorting to calling me 12 years old because I said you make yourself sound like a morn. You must not know much about politics. If me calling you a moron irks you, you couldnt last in politics. You should really read up on how much name calling goes and overall viciousness goes on in Congress. Just look at the man responsible for the Dems control of Congress, the DCCC Chairman for the '06 election Rahm Emanuel. Hes one of the most vicious and prolific name callers on Capital Hill.
 

hellokeith

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2004
1,664
0
0
I only see two ways Hillary exits:

1. Runs out of money - Not likely, even if she has a serious fundraising dry spell.
2. Doesn't get the nomination - I'd still give her a 50% chance of getting the Democratic nomination, even if she loses every caucus.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,548
1,128
126
Originally posted by: hellokeith
I only see two ways Hillary exits:

1. Runs out of money - Not likely, even if she has a serious fundraising dry spell.
2. Doesn't get the nomination - I'd still give her a 50% chance of getting the Democratic nomination, even if she loses every caucus.

No. She will bow out instead of being completely embarrassed. After Feb 5 Obama will be the last person standing on the Democratic side.
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: teclis1023
It's too late for the Clinton legacy. Bill will now be written off as an inconsequential, scandal-ridden POTUS who governed between two War Presidents

Bill remains one of the most popular American Presidents of all time - he has only become more popular with Bush's inept leadership.
More likely Bush?s ineptness makes Bill?s time look that much better.

Bill was so popular in 2000 that his VP couldn?t win the election. (And if you are of the belief that Gore was cheated it still says a lot that the sitting VP during a time of peace and a good economy couldn?t win his own home state and could barely win the election 48.4% to 47.9%. Bush 41, also a sitting VP, creamed Dukakis in 1988 53% to 45%)

Clinton is going to go down in history as an unremarkable president who served during a 'boring' period of history. Nothing happened during Bill's term that will be talked about 20 years from now, except his personal problems and impeachment.

Gore did everything he could do to run away from Bill in 2000.

and, in fairness, he won the election anyways. :p

Sure he won the election as the 1st runner up which is also the first loser!
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: teclis1023
It's too late for the Clinton legacy. Bill will now be written off as an inconsequential, scandal-ridden POTUS who governed between two War Presidents

Bill remains one of the most popular American Presidents of all time - he has only become more popular with Bush's inept leadership.
More likely Bush?s ineptness makes Bill?s time look that much better.

Bill was so popular in 2000 that his VP couldn?t win the election. (And if you are of the belief that Gore was cheated it still says a lot that the sitting VP during a time of peace and a good economy couldn?t win his own home state and could barely win the election 48.4% to 47.9%. Bush 41, also a sitting VP, creamed Dukakis in 1988 53% to 45%)

Clinton is going to go down in history as an unremarkable president who served during a 'boring' period of history. Nothing happened during Bill's term that will be talked about 20 years from now, except his personal problems and impeachment.

If there is one thing I remember about Bill is his neglect of our national security that's why we are in this state of terror now!
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Big question: if Hillary losses the nomination does she stay in the Senate or does she retire?

Oh, I don't see here retiring. Not at all.

I suspect that the Clinton's see themselves as sort of like the Kennedy's - a political family dynasty. So, I don't see her retiring, a better bet IMO is that she models herself after Ted Kennedy - a career as a powerful long-lasting Senator (who has long ago given up hope for the Presidency).

My "big question" - if HRC can't get the nomination, would she accept the VP nomination from Obama?

She'd make history as the first female VP, and could run later, but this time with a "real" claim of experience.

Fern

I don't think she will retire either, because bad grass is hard to get rid off!
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Do some research... You make yourself sound like a moron.

What are you - like 12 years old? Do they not teach civics in your school system?

You deny the factual record of the Budget Act of 1990 which provided for PAYGO and federal debt reduction.

You deny the overwhelming Democratic majority in approving PAYGO.

You deny that the President submits a proposed budget each year.


Yes - You are a Legend In Your Own Mind.
Are you ignorant of the fact that the budgets Clinton proposed prior to the Republicans taking over had absolutely NO deficit reduction?
Even after the Republicans took over congress Bill tried pushing a budget that included 5 years of nearly $200 billion deficits.

I have posted the actual budgets on here before and can do so again if need be.
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
307
126
I heard Gore is going to announce before the runoffs in the big states. /tongue in cheek
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Big question: if Hillary losses the nomination does she stay in the Senate or does she retire?

Oh, I don't see here retiring. Not at all.

I suspect that the Clinton's see themselves as sort of like the Kennedy's - a political family dynasty. So, I don't see her retiring, a better bet IMO is that she models herself after Ted Kennedy - a career as a powerful long-lasting Senator (who has long ago given up hope for the Presidency).

My "big question" - if HRC can't get the nomination, would she accept the VP nomination from Obama?

She'd make history as the first female VP, and could run later, but this time with a "real" claim of experience.

Fern

An Obama/Richardson
An Obama/Biden

are both stronger tickets than an Obama/Clinton Ticket.

Biden would be great, if not just for the quips.