Drone Take Down

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
Flying a quadcopter that close to trees is suicidal anyway. The pilot got what he deserved.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Ah, 1.7M views of just that specific (re)posting of it at Imgur.

Guess that explains why 3 people have already emailed me a link to this.


1.5M views on the original Youtube video, with numerous reposts of it there too, including three news organizations.



If a cat ever jumps onto a quadcopter, I'm pretty sure that'll end up with continuous coverage on the major networks for 2 full days.



Also, the download of that is a 70MB GIF. o_O
 
Last edited:

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Ah, 1.7M views of just that specific (re)posting of it at Imgur.

Guess that explains why 3 people have already emailed me a link to this.


1.5M views on the original Youtube video, with numerous reposts of it there too, including three news organizations.



If a cat ever jumps onto a quadcopter, I'm pretty sure that'll end up with continuous coverage on the major networks for 2 full days.

Also, the download of that is a 70MB GIF. o_O
:D I now have a mental image of a man dressed in ragged skins explaining what brought down civilization.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
Is it not?

Depends on where you live and how much property you own. Plus shooting into the air in general can be considered a negligent discharge. What goes up must come down, and it might come down on the kid in the yard a few blocks away.

Shooting them down is inefficient anyway. If drones ever become a real problem I'll just invest in a radio jammer that covers my property at the appropriate frequencies.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Depends on where you live and how much property you own. Plus shooting into the air in general can be considered a negligent discharge. What goes up must come down, and it might come down on the kid in the yard a few blocks away.

Shooting them down is inefficient anyway. If drones ever become a real problem I'll just invest in a radio jammer that covers my property at the appropriate frequencies.

that is certainly illegal, and it will stay that way for good reason.

the "appropriate frequencies" you seek to jam are not used exclusively by the quadcopter you wish to down, but by anything in the 2.4GHz band, which is just about everything. if you interfere with someone's life sustaining equipment, emergency phone call or similar, the FCC will have you in FMITA prison. if there are reports of aircraft communications interference, the FAA will get you even sooner. as for covering only the intended property, no. even very low power transmitters can reach several miles.

i'd give an operator of such a jammer 24-36 continuous hours max of operation before being cuffed and stuffed.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
that is certainly illegal, and it will stay that way for good reason.

the "appropriate frequencies" you seek to jam are not used exclusively by the quadcopter you wish to down, but by anything in the 2.4GHz band, which is just about everything. if you interfere with someone's life sustaining equipment, emergency phone call or similar, the FCC will have you in FMITA prison. if there are reports of aircraft communications interference, the FAA will get you even sooner. as for covering only the intended property, no. even very low power transmitters can reach several miles.

i'd give an operator of such a jammer 24-36 continuous hours max of operation before being cuffed and stuffed.
Vision system + upgraded anti-mosquito laser.
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
Can you guys see how when he lost on the first swipe instead of pulling the stick back and throwing another hit at the drone he came up with the backhand sweeping move? He is able to understand sweeping movements and not just hitting movements. There is much smart in this one.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
that is certainly illegal, and it will stay that way for good reason.

the "appropriate frequencies" you seek to jam are not used exclusively by the quadcopter you wish to down, but by anything in the 2.4GHz band, which is just about everything. if you interfere with someone's life sustaining equipment, emergency phone call or similar, the FCC will have you in FMITA prison. if there are reports of aircraft communications interference, the FAA will get you even sooner. as for covering only the intended property, no. even very low power transmitters can reach several miles.

i'd give an operator of such a jammer 24-36 continuous hours max of operation before being cuffed and stuffed.

So I get a nice power supply and lower the power as much as needed, along with perhaps some directional antennas as emitters to ensure the signal stays on or above my property. And who said anything about continuous? I see a drone over my property, I flip a switch, drone falls out of the sky, I dispose of inert drone and deactivate jammer.
 

Raduque

Lifer
Aug 22, 2004
13,140
138
106
You're a dickhead, irishScott. And they're not drones. Drones are what the US government uses to drop missiles on brown people, and soon our own citizens.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
You're a dickhead, irishScott. And they're not drones. Drones are what the US government uses to drop missiles on brown people, and soon our own citizens.

Yeah, because the "drone" mentioned in the OP that was knocked down by a chimp with a branch was clearly a military grade predator flying over Africa. :rolleyes:
Also do you even Google, bro? https://www.google.com/search?q=dro...YgwTdzoCoCw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAw&biw=1920&bih=1099

And I fail to see how messing around with the airwaves immediately on or above my own property (presuming I found the time) makes me a dickhead, but whatever'll help you sleep better.
 

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
7,143
3,619
136
So I get a nice power supply and lower the power as much as needed, along with perhaps some directional antennas as emitters to ensure the signal stays on or above my property. And who said anything about continuous? I see a drone over my property, I flip a switch, drone falls out of the sky, I dispose of inert drone and deactivate jammer.
A better solution would be to follow the drone back to its owner and beat the owner holding the transmitter over the head with the drone.

'Kill' two birds with one drone :awe:
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Yeah, because the "drone" mentioned in the OP that was knocked down by a chimp with a branch was clearly a military grade predator flying over Africa. :rolleyes:
Also do you even Google, bro? https://www.google.com/search?q=dro...YgwTdzoCoCw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAw&biw=1920&bih=1099

And I fail to see how messing around with the airwaves immediately on or above my own property (presuming I found the time) makes me a dickhead, but whatever'll help you sleep better.

He's saying that "drone" is a misnomer when applied to these small UAVs. These are simply UAVs. Technically, it's only a "drone" if it flies itself to the coordinates you give it, and enters a holding pattern automatically -- with no need to be piloted directly.

Anyway, the air above your property is sometimes occupied by aircraft.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
51,582
7,249
136
So, which one of you guys ran out of bullets?

http://i.imgur.com/ivu7txP.gifv

monkeyrifle.jpg


:awe:
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
So I get a nice power supply and lower the power as much as needed, along with perhaps some directional antennas as emitters to ensure the signal stays on or above my property. And who said anything about continuous? I see a drone over my property, I flip a switch, drone falls out of the sky, I dispose of inert drone and deactivate jammer.
Would not work, most, including mine have a failsafe function, and will return to where they were launched, and land if they lose signal. Mine will climb 75 feet before doing so.
EDIT; perhaps if you were to jam most, if not all 6 GPS satellites that guide it?
 
Last edited:

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
He's saying that "drone" is a misnomer when applied to these small UAVs. These are simply UAVs. Technically, it's only a "drone" if it flies itself to the coordinates you give it, and enters a holding pattern automatically -- with no need to be piloted directly.

Anyway, the air above your property is sometimes occupied by aircraft.
Then I guess that what I have IS a drone:eek: I can program 3 waypoints with a smartphone, it will hover briefly at each one then return to launch site.