Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Evidence proves that the 21 minimum drinking age law is effective, having saved over 900 lives a year since its inception.
900 lives although important to those individuals are sadly insignificant to the masses.
They should quote it properly in the article...
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has estimated that since the 21 Minimum Legal Drinking Age was enacted in 1984, approximately 900 lives a year have been saved in traffic fatalities alone. (1)
Which makes it obvious that the 900 saved lives pertain to drink driving, not preventing people from binging and dying related to alcohol poisoning...
They should also state the references used to support it. There is no point saying "the evidence supports" and then not presenting the evidence. Anyone can do that...
The evidence supports that legalising gay marriage would lead to world peace.
The evidence supports that going back to the moon would end the recession.
The evidence supports that banks should not be bailed out.
The evidence supports that legalising marijuana will reduce violent crime rates...
Etcetera. Without backing it up they are just pointless statements :|