Originally posted by: Shanti
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: GagHalfrunt
Lifetime, about $5 million or so. I think I'd be retired by now if I didn't drink so much in my late teens and early 20's.
On a single bottle, I bought my girlfriend a bottle of Dom Perignon for graduation from college. With 2 crystal flutes it was close to $400, so figure around $350 for the bottle itself.
I can get Dom for around $100 a bottle. You got taken.
If you're buying Dom at $100 a bottle YOU are the one getting taken. Anything near that price is an inferior vintage and you're buying crap just to have a name on the bottle. You might as well buy Freixenet, it'll be just as good and you'll save $80.
Anyone who spends $350 on a bottle of champagne is just doing it to feel important.
I guarantee that if you did a blind taste test between that $350 bottle and a good $20-30 bottle of champagne, 99% of the people wouldn't be able to tell which is which and at least half the people would prefer the $20 bottle.
It's like buying a $10000 Rolex. Is it really a better watch than a $100 Seiko?
No, but it has the Rolex name and it lets people know how rich and important you are.
Anyone see the taste test they did with two buck chuck against $30-$50 bottles of wine?
The testers were students and teachers at a culinary institute and two buck chuck beat most of the other wines.
only because of the oversupply of good grapes in cali. two buck chuck is good wine but it is a product of current industry conditions and cannot be used to say a 30-50 dollar of wine is not worth it.