• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DragonMasterAlex

calbear2000

Golden Member
I haven't been caught up with the latest debate in the P&N forum, but I see posts littered by dragonmasteralex referencing Bowfinger in many of his rants.

I don't think calling people out constitutes as personal attacks, but when they're constantly in this form, some cleaning up and filtering out is in order:


"Reading this made me think of stupid-heads like Bowfinger. /begin rant

Post which would otherwise be taken seriously

/end rant/

What are your thoughts?

BTW, grow up Nutfinger and stop making personal attacks!"



Examples:
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1211557 "people-haters such as Bowfinger"
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1212881 "as dishonest and deceitful as Bowfinger"
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1210782&STARTPAGE=2 "whiny piss-ant people like Bowfinger"

Posts like these provoke endless flamefests and do not contribute to the discussion at all. Good posts from conservatives and liberals alike on P&N deteriorate tremendously when this kind of behavior is condoned.

Just my 2 cents.

He's been warned.
 
"First, as I said in another thread, you can take that trailer trash chip on your shoulder and shove it straight up your rectum. You may or may not be a bastard. I will leave that determination to any friends, family, and co-workers you may have. You are, however, an ill-informed and belligerent boor. You seem to feel that everyone who needs help is just as worthless as your father. You are too wrapped up in your own self-hate to recognize you are not the only person in the world, your story is not the only story in the world, and perhaps of most relevance here, your opinion is not the only valid opinion in the world.

Second, as I said before, here and elsewhere, "Grow up. You obviously haven't paid the slightest attention to anything I've said or NOT said. You're just making stuff up, embarrassing yourself in the process." If you can show me where I said anything remotely related to charitable giving, I will be most appreciative. Until then, I will assume your use of my name is just another of your pathetic, childish lies intended to demonize someone with whom you cannot compete. (The same applies to eminent domain, another load you dishonestly attached to me.)

I can't tell for sure, but you might be interesting. You obviously have great passion. It is too bad you can't channel it into adult discussion. I express concerns for the middle class and for people who lack a living wage and basic health benefits. You somehow pervert this into calling me a greedy, people-hating, cynical monster. WTF? Those are names one associates with your comments, not mine.

Time and again you fail to address specific points raised by others, launching instead yet another tirade full of name-calling and nonsense. You rant and rage about "stealing" and "slavery", but you have yet to explain what specific actions constitute stealing and slavery.

To put it bluntly, your communication skills suck. Your posts are mostly gibberish, your intellect shrouded by hateful spews. This thread is a great example. People give to charity. Duh. So what? What does it prove? Are you suggesting it makes some alternatives unneccessary? If so, which alternatives? Why are they unneccessary? Where are your numbers showing the total need, so we can see if charitable giving is enough? Do your numbers mean anything, or are they an empty attempt to distract from other issues? In short, what's your point?

If you must continue your name-calling and personal attacks, I suggest you take it to PM. If and when you are interested in actually responding to points and issues raised by others, perhaps we can have a useful discussion."


Yeah, Bowfinger hasn't egged him on or been guilty of the same at all.
rolleye.gif
 
Did I say Bowfinger is not at fault?
rolleye.gif


"Posts like these provoke endless flamefests and do not contribute to the discussion at all."


If DMA creates multiple posts baiting Bowfinger, it doesn't take a genius to figure out the object of scorn is going to reply and retaliate.

Why don't you link to the post where you cut and pasted that from?

Text
 
I think the entire political forum and OT form member listing should be banned, myself included.

Problem solved.
 
Originally posted by: calbear2000
Did I say Bowfinger is not at fault?
rolleye.gif


"Posts like these provoke endless flamefests and do not contribute to the discussion at all."


If DMA creates multiple posts baiting Bowfinger, it doesn't take a genius to figure out the object of scorn is going to reply and retaliate.

Why don't you link to the post where you cut and pasted that from?

Text

No, but you certainly didn't act as if he shared blame. Why didn't I link? I guess I'm lazy.
 
Back
Top