exar333
Diamond Member
- Feb 7, 2004
- 8,518
- 8
- 91
Reasonably modern critically acclaimed game from 2009 with 60 hours content is free, people bitch because some of the DLC aren't.
Gee they can't win.
Lol, this.
Reasonably modern critically acclaimed game from 2009 with 60 hours content is free, people bitch because some of the DLC aren't.
Gee they can't win.
Um, you do realize this is essentially an isometric game (it's "spiritual predacessors" were the Neverwinter Nights & Baldur's Gate D&D ruleset style games) that can "zoom in" to pseudo 3rd-person views? It's not an FPS-RPG like Oblivion / Skyrim (nor intended to be).Ok I was bored late last night so I downloaded this, set up my character, listened to all the blah blah blah clicking answers to questions to begin the game, and then I see that I have to play from 3rd person angles and tell folks what to do. So Im like UGH, this seems like a lot of work and quit the game.
My question is this, do you ever get to play and fight in first person? If not Im not even gonna bother starting it up again. LOL
No I was unaware, thats why I asked. I just saw it on Origin, thought free is good and downloaded it before even reading anything about it. Guess Ill go ahead and uninstall as this is certainly not gonna be my cup o' tea.Um, you do realize this is essentially an isometric game (it's "spiritual predacessors" were the Neverwinter Nights & Baldur's Gate D&D ruleset style games) that can "zoom in" to pseudo 3rd-person views? It's not an FPS-RPG like Oblivion / Skyrim (nor intended to be).
I downloaded free as well...isometric is not a problem for me. Good story line, halfway decent graphics, voice acting etc. is what makes a game interesting. My only problem is I have never played a D and D type game...although I did play D and D old style. Having problems figuring out combat, but will muddle thru. Played ME 2, Oblivian, Witcher, FPS, but combat here eintirely different.Guess Ill go ahead and uninstall as this is certainly not gonna be my cup o' tea.
It's a pretty good game. I felt like the combat classes were a little lacking in versatility. Mages whoop all over everything if you plan your skill tree properly. I like to take disabling spells so I can sit back and watch my fighters and archers mop everything up.
A tip and small spoiler(not really a spoiler, you'll just enjoy the game a million times more if you read this I think.Go to the Tower of Magi as soon as you can to get your healer, it's the only healer in the game unless you make your character a healer
I prefer Neverwinter Nights (1 or 2, doesn't matter). There is something about the dnd ruleset that makes things better.
Yeah I kind of hate having to allocate points right away since I have no idea how the game works so I was freaking out about whether I went the right way with things. It's not like there were only two options, there was something like 16 different selections or whatever. How the hell am I supposed to know what to pick before I have even played a second of the game?
Thanks for the tip, I will do that for sure.
KT
As a mage, you will need to take at least a couple damaging spells early because there is a solo area that you come across rather early. (in the tower actually) Ice and lightning or something of the sort. It's kind of a necessity, but then branch out to whatever your plan is.
Game is like crack. I have not been this invested in a game since the first Mass Effect. Can't believe it was free!
KT
I'm surprised you never picked it up when it was first released(retail/paid version),remember the big thread in PC gaming on DA.
I have the original DA CE version and Ultimate editions plus DA2 etc so have put many hours into the game and finished it,I'm just waiting now for DA Inquisition which will soon be here.
Yeah, not sure why I skipped it then. I think I am just always a little unsure on these ones; I need a good story with characters to get invested in for an RPG and I may have been concerned it was something like The Witcher, which was an RPG I just could not get into. That one felt way too detached while in DA:Origins, I really feel like I am in the world and making decisions which really impact the world and the story.
Am I right in thinking playing through as a different class would give an entirely different experience? I feel as if the story I am currently involved in is quite specific to the path(s) I have chosen thus far.
KT
I played as melee first time but second time as mage which was more fun, however mages are overpowered compared to the melee characters,having said that mage class was my favourite for Dragon Age.
I'll say playing as mage it felt in some ways more personal,ie renegade mages,blood mages etc,power the chantry had over mages etc,so the decisions felt more personal sometimes.
Hmm, well maybe that is why I am connecting with it, since I am playing a mage. Even as a mage though, it seems like I could play as a completely different character based upon the choices I have made so far.
No matter right now though since I am not all that far into the game yet. Once I finish this play through I will see if/how I want to play the second time. Was thinking of trying a Rogue; picking locks and stealing things could be fun.
KT
Hmm, well maybe that is why I am connecting with it, since I am playing a mage. Even as a mage though, it seems like I could play as a completely different character based upon the choices I have made so far.
No matter right now though since I am not all that far into the game yet. Once I finish this play through I will see if/how I want to play the second time. Was thinking of trying a Rogue; picking locks and stealing things could be fun.
KT
And remember, Awakening, it's not free but... it's a nice expansion. And in my opinion it just expends well on an already-satisfying conclusion given by Origins (well, you'll get 'one of' a couple of possible different endings, but whichever one you do have should be satisfying). At the end of Awakening I truly felt that my Warden's story was completed, it provided good closure and I could close the book with a smile on my face, without the wish nor need to have further expansions or a sequel for said Warden. It's something I haven't experienced with the Mass Effect franchise. If there's one thing I can say about Dragon Age is that it ultimately feels much more complete and satisfying (but to each their own, of course). I mean, it wasn't on the perhaps close-to-exaggeration half-hour long Return of the King scale, but it provided a similarly-polished, enough-detailed ending and a relevant-enough text and picture-based epilogue afterwards that just made the whole thing feel "complete".
**snip**
You should. I think I finished the game with four different characters over the years and the (backstab) rogue was hands down the most fun. Once you get leveled up, a dual dagger rogue is both fun and devastating in combat.
The thing about playing a mage is that there are some really good ones already available for your party. They are interesting to play but I always felt like I was giving something up by not having Wynn or Morrigan in my party. I actually played a three mage and one tank party most of the way. It was OK but I had to go without a rogue.
in my opinion, playing DAO+Awakening roughly equals a single playthrough of BG2 (don't hang me for this blasphemy) but still i had much more fun playing BG2 because i like D&D builds and priest/fighters
Meh. If you guys like it that much then it must pick up from the beginning from what I have seen of the game.
The BG and NWN games are basically what I like to play.
