DPAD Members: Please Read. Experiment Time!![edit]answer found?

[Overkiller]

Hello everyone,

I am going to ask a little bit of something from my great teamates :Q :beer:

-Pick a time soon and flush all your results. Then 24 hours from this time look at the size of your results.txt file. EDIT[ & Mpts
-Flush again and 24 hours later do the same...the 2 values should be close to one another

If possible could everyone do this on at least one of their systems (i'm looking for Variety here) & then post in this thread the system specs & the results.

I have a
-1700+ @ 2.1 Ghz with Ram Timings at 2-3-3-6 @ 200 mhz
-P4C 2.8ghz @ 3.2ghz with Ram @ 220 & timings of 2.5, 4, 4, 8 (Yes i am the owner of perhaps the shittiest pair of XMS pc-3700 ever)

I will Update this when i have the first set of rsults tomorrow @ 6:40PM Est .

And yes..this does have some relevance ...while we know that more CPU mhz = more results there is no actual guide..so i am incorporating this into my guide

Thank You one and all


[edit] dregged up this old thread...will get to putting these on my machines @ home shortly..can you guys do this as well and then doing this comparision will be MUCH MUCH MUCH easier

linky

Be sure to read to the end!!!

 

[OverVolt]

I flushed at 7AM today, so tommarow at 7AM i'll post the results for all my rigs, they are

P4 2.4B Stock (Samsung 2.5-4-4-7)
P4 3.0C @ 3.18 212FSB (Kingston HyperX 2-3-3-5)
AMD 1600+ @ 1.71Ghz 162FSB (Samsung DDR400 (2-3-3-7)
AMD 2000+ stock (1.67Ghz) (dunno, its an HP )
PIII 733

 

[DanC]

Ugh. I'll have to do some thinking on that. I usually dump when the TeAm needs WU's - rather than at a particular time.
I have an T-bird 1.2 and a Duron 600/900 that I can test though.

 

[Overkiller]

Those 2 lower end systems would be perfect!! btw i can get a 1.2 ghz tbird up too..just haven';t gotten around to it

 

[DanC]

lower end

Hanging my head in shame... I remember when those were cutting-edge!

 

[rybobcat]

i will flush my dual Xeon server later today. I am running with a thread count of 4. It has dual 2.4 Ghz processor and 2 G of ram.

 

[OverVolt]

Well here's my 24hr results

P4 3.0C Dual-DDR400 2-3-3-5.....................112Kb (i did game about an hour on here )
Athlon XP 1.71Ghz (Pali core) DC DDR333....98Kb (this suprised me)
P4 2.4B Single DDR333 2.5-4-4-8.................48Kb (thought this would be better)
Athlon XP-M 1.67Ghz (2000+) DDR266.........41Kb
P3 733Mhz PC133.........................................20kb

 

[Starrider]

I'll have to start over again, mother nature downed some power lines here in town and I lost several hours of crunch time over night. Thought it seemed a little cold in the house this morning.

 

[BlackMountainCow]

One thing u should keep in mind is the fact, that not all results produce a bigger results.txt file. My 3200+ for example has been recrunching quarantined results quit often the last days. So I only have one entry in the results file (euqals one KB) but in fact it has run that result 6 time (would equal 6 KB). During my last 200 results I had about 10 of them being quarantined recrunchings, and each one crunched around 4 or 6 times. So actually I have 240 to 260 results in that results.txt file, but the seize is not 260 KB but just 200 KB.

So judging from file size to contained results or Muon points doesn't work that well I think, as each of these recrunchings was worth about 1500 to 2000 points.

Just some positive criticism

 

[nickPOWERZ]

Athlon 2400+ (stock, dual 256mb Crucial DDR 266 @ 2.5-?) - 24hrs=16366 Mpts

I only kept track of Mpts, sorry if you were looking for kb. I remember if was over 50 though.

edit: @ 79 results.

 

[BlackMountainCow]

Athlon XP 2000+, 512 MB PC2100 Infineon RAM - 24h = 96 results = 101k

 

[Kokomo]

OverK, as BMC pointed out, there are several variables to consider, and I'm not sure we can quantify results on a machine by machine basis --- but I'm up for trying. I'm working on a spreadsheet which will generate a number reflecting average Mpts per unit, but I'm having a hard time equating CPU cycles to either. I'll keep plugging away until I get it, or fail, or someone whose math skills are better comes along...

 

[Kokomo]

Originally posted by: rybobcat
i will flush my dual Xeon server later today. I am running with a thread count of 4. It has dual 2.4 Ghz processor and 2 G of ram.

I guess that makes us bros, in a way. One of my machines is also a dual Xeon 2.4.

Only machine I have that can run with it is the P4P 2.8/GA-8IK1100/2x256 Corsair XMS LL.

 

[Kokomo]

I'm generating an average of 208.9719 Mpts per Unit over 741 units. Is this number helpful for comparison?

 

[Overkiller]

Thanks for the criticism..i forgot the rechecks :Q :Q

Should we try to quantify based on Mpts then because the higher the muon transfer then the higher the amount of points, and hence the higher the length of time taken to complete the run (i.e. a .02 MPTS result takes a millisecond )???

Perhaps going by Mpts instead of KB (althought KB is a good way to measure roughly) would be better?

Kokomo
-I would was to seperate the results we are getting into 2 separate fields...i.e. Intel and AMD.
-Within these sub-fields we can separate them into separate classes of Cpus (i.e. P3, P4, Tbird, Tbred, A64, and so on)

What do you guys think of that?

 

[Kokomo]

Originally posted by: Overkiller
Thanks for the criticism..i forgot the rechecks :Q :Q Should we try to quantify based on Mpts then because the higher the muon transfer then the higher the amount of points, and hence the higher the length of time taken to complete the run (i.e. a .02 MPTS result takes a millisecond )???

Perhaps going by Mpts instead of KB (althought KB is a good way to measure roughly) would be better? Kokomo -I would was to seperate the results we are getting into 2 separate fields...i.e. Intel and AMD. -Within these sub-fields we can separate them into separate classes of Cpus (i.e. P3, P4, Tbird, Tbred, A64, and so on) What do you guys think of that?

First, no criticism was intended, and after reading the above I'm real glad you are running this experiment. I honestly don't know the answers, but I'm anxious to participate, and learn. Many (most?) won't much concern themselves with the mathematical subleties, or understand them, but are interested in what's fastest. Speaking as an "Old WU Hound" (I have at least one foot in that group), I am more (to my great shame?) concerned with being the fastest old d-padding fart on the planet than "whys and wherefores" I will likely never understand.

Lead the way.

 

[Overkiller]

:Q

Well as i only have overclocked systems ..my results will be higher than stock cpus running at these speeds but here goes!

For my P4C 2.8 @ 3.2 i get a results.txt file of: 115KB & Totalling X MPTS(waiting on slipstream to update )
For my 1700+ @ 2.1 ghz....(2 more hrs to go )

 

[amdxborg]

Great work everybody!!!

Overkiller this is a very very good idea!

How about a TA DPAD webpage with all these stuff on it...

 

[Overkiller]

hehe,

well first lets get the Guide out the door...Then We can take soni's service installer...then we need to get this performance chart done....then we need someone to provide a working interface of a webpage with all this in there..then we we need hosting...and finally...then we can all have a neat little link in our sigs

I'll finish up the DPAD guide tonite

 

[Kokomo]

Originally posted by: Overkiller
:Q

Well as i only have overclocked systems

U no overcrock! Directions say, "U no overcrock, else all cyrcrlys berong us! Warrannty no good us, U! Overcrocking bad, bad, bad!!! Ugery, even!!!"

Hope you're chuckling, OverKiller. I was just interpreting the destructions that came with my latest mainboard (and most of the others).

Btw, check out my bud, Cowper... uhhh Cowboy's stats.

 

[Overkiller]

hehe

overclocking is bad..mmk?

 

[Kokomo]

Originally posted by: Overkiller
hehe overclocking is bad..mmk?

If it is, we're going to meet in a very warm place. :evil:

 

[Overkiller]

Good, cause its 0 Degreees here now

ok..back on topic

115KB txt file = 23637 Mpts....from P4C over 24 hrs
102Kb txt file = 19094 Mpts...from 1700+@ 2.1ghz over 24 hrs

 

[Kokomo]

Originally posted by: Overkiller
Good, cause its 0 Degreees here now
ok..back on topic 115KB txt file = 23637 Mpts....from P4C over 24 hrsAthlon=

Excuse me. Back on topic. The results from my P4C 2.8s seem to agree with yours. Call it 25,000 Mpts in 24 hours, give or take a variable or two.

 

[Overkiller]

Are your 2.8's @ 3.2?

Also, i gamed (intensively) for about 4.5 hrs total yesterday so that equates into some down time...