Per Stephen's Good news and bad news posts on the muon1 board I would recommend that you revert to the v4.34 client, pending the release of v4.41...
Since we will not have fixed lattice files until v4.41, the results produced by v4.4 are bad... Switching back to v4.34 will also produce higher Mpts yields as the clipping method is not in place and the client is much faster.
-z
			
			In a second post he notes:The good news is: I've tested one of the recent ~10.25% designs from SolenoidsTo15cm and they are repeatable, not a fluke or an error.
The bad news is split into two parts.
The part you probably already knew was that v4.4 is slower and disagrees with v4.34 on the percentages for SolenoidsTo15cm because it lets the solenoid fields extend a large distance from the magnets rather than clipping them at the entrance of the adjacent solenoids, as v4.34 did. The way I've got Muon1 to repeat the results properly is by changing the solenoid clipping essentially back to how it was (except less cludged) in the v4.41 development source.
The other part of bad news is that there's a stupid error in the "...A" lattice files themselves, so when v4.41 comes out we will be correcting that, with PhaseRotB and ChicaneLinacB, simulated using the proper clipping (so SolenoidsTo15cm will agree with v4.34 again) and also back to v4.34 speeds because of that.
The current stuff in the ...A optimisation section of the database is bad results, or at least results that would need some funny interpretation.
Since we will not have fixed lattice files until v4.41, the results produced by v4.4 are bad... Switching back to v4.34 will also produce higher Mpts yields as the clipping method is not in place and the client is much faster.
-z
				
		
			