• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Download your brain by 2050...

Analog

Lifer
Ashes to ashes, brain to disk
AFP
May 23, 2005

LONDON: Death could become a thing of the past by the mid-21st century as computer technology becomes sophisticated enough for the contents of a brain to be "downloaded" on to a supercomputer, according to a leading British futurologist.

However, he told The Observer newspaper, this technology might be expensive enough to remain the preserve of the rich for a decade or two more.

Among other eyebrow-raising predictions by Ian Pearson, head of the futurology unit at British telecommunications giant BT, is the prospect of computer systems being able to feel emotions.

This could eventually involve such things as aeroplanes being programmed to be even more terrified of crashing than their passengers, meaning they would do whatever possible to stay airborne.

While the predictions might sound outlandish, they were merely the product of extrapolations drawn from the current rate at which computers are evolving, Pearson said in an interview with the newspaper. "If you draw the timelines, realistically by 2050 we would expect to be able to download your mind into a machine, so when you die it's not a major career problem," he said.

"If you're rich enough then by 2050 it's feasible. If you're poor you'll probably have to wait until 2075 or 2080 when it's routine. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/co...ory_page/0,5744,15374571%5E601,00.html
 
This could eventually involve such things as aeroplanes being programmed to be even more terrified of crashing than their passengers, meaning they would do whatever possible to stay airborne.

if i were an airplane trying to save myself i'd eject the deadweight...the people😉
 
Makes me think of the IRobot book, the real book not the movie.

Was a part in there about killing people in order to in the end save them.

 
I call BS. We were promised flying cars 50 years ago, and we still don't have them. Now we're being promised flying cars that can give you oral pleasure? Ridiculous!
 
Ok, so maybe computers will have the ability to store the information from your brain and process it but how will we get the info in there in the first place?
 
Originally posted by: AaronB
Ok, so maybe computers will have the ability to store the information from your brain and process it but how will we get the info in there in the first place?

Uplink port in your head. DUH.
 
See, I don't want an airplane with emotions because what happens if it, say, decides it wants to feel pain, or hates its employer 😛.
 
Odd point....you have self awareness now, right? I mean, "I think, therefore I am" and all that?

What happens if they copied your brain onto another brain? Would you be thinking from two different bodies, now? Would the other person have their own, individual, self awareness not linked to "you" at all, but just a copy?

And if you died...you'd still be dead, right? I mean, the other person would have all your knowledge, but if they had their own self awareness before you died, they'd still have it afterwards....

This is all just confusing!

Although I'm hardly religious - there must be SOMETHING akin to a "soul" or something in your body, otherwise these "copying" questions really get kinda hairy.

I'd be happier if they discovered a "soul" and could start working on ways to move that around...
 
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
Ashes to ashes, brain to disk
AFP
May 23, 2005

LONDON: Death could become a thing of the past by the mid-21st century as computer technology becomes sophisticated enough for the contents of a brain to be "downloaded" on to a supercomputer, according to a leading British futurologist.

However, he told The Observer newspaper, this technology might be expensive enough to remain the preserve of the rich for a decade or two more.

Among other eyebrow-raising predictions by Ian Pearson, head of the futurology unit at British telecommunications giant BT, is the prospect of computer systems being able to feel emotions.

This could eventually involve such things as aeroplanes being programmed to be even more terrified of crashing than their passengers, meaning they would do whatever possible to stay airborne.

While the predictions might sound outlandish, they were merely the product of extrapolations drawn from the current rate at which computers are evolving, Pearson said in an interview with the newspaper. "If you draw the timelines, realistically by 2050 we would expect to be able to download your mind into a machine, so when you die it's not a major career problem," he said.

"If you're rich enough then by 2050 it's feasible. If you're poor you'll probably have to wait until 2075 or 2080 when it's routine. http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/co...ory_page/0,5744,15374571%5E601,00.html

I doubt this will be true. How the development of the brain in the human life span is you're born with an excess of brain cells and although many die off, it's the way that the connections between neurons form that matters. Supposedly for each neuron, it averages 10^4 connections to other neurons so for anyone to "download" a brain in it's entirety, they'd have to map out all the neuron connections between the billions of brain cells. The storage capacity in the future may be possible, but the better question is how ould one map it all out without invasive damage.

Then the next question is, even if they could map it all out, would the information merely be a static copy or something that you can actually run.

As already mentioned, 50+ year predictions are often notoriously wrong.
 
Back
Top