Double Standards: Agent Orange

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Agent orange is not a chemical weapon and never was. People should be smarter than that. It is like saying we are commiting chemical warefare by putting fertilzer on crops, some environmentalists might believe it but it is saving lives of people who would starve to death.

Let me guess . . . if someone dumps a carcinogen/neurotoxin into the Potomac . . . like say Agent Orange . . . FOXNews would say the US had not been attacked with a chemical weapon. Your analogy is wrong b/c typically fertilizer runoff leads to nitrogen/phosphorus toxicity which promotes algae overgrowth and fish kills . . . a more appropriate analogy would be pesticide runoff or overflow from hog waste lagoons. If you think neither is serious threat to public health then you need to educate yourself b/c clearly you should be smarter than that.

US farms would be less productive without fertilizer but of course my state has some of the best arable land in the world . . . but choose crops based on profit NOT need . . . hence our #1 crop remains tobacco . . . I guess the 10-20-20 we use so liberally is designed to help RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris feed the world nicotine.