My reply was not to be taken seriously.
I think both did test at our default native resolutions.
Just goes to show how meaningless benchmarks are.
One person has a system with totally different setup than the other, so totally different results.
Sure, to compare machines exact same specs need to be compared.
But in reality, you should compare as you use them.
Instead of saying:
"But you are running 1400x900x32. I was running 1920x1200x32 "
we should be saying:
"Both systems tested in the same way they are used everyday"
One person doesn't game. One person can't stand higher than 1440x900 due too eyes.
No one is wrong. Higher score means nothing.
The one that is better is the one that suites your needs best, not the one that scores highest.
If the above, if we were offered to trade laptops, I'm sure both of us would laugh and so no way.