Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
<sigh> You people just refuse to see the point. YOU are blasting Bush for things and blaming EVERYTHING on Bush. But you seem to ignore the fact that the same things were done before Bush. It doesn't absolve him of anything but that isn't what I'm saying. Where is/was your outrage for Clinton on these issues? Were you screaming for regime change in the whitehouse when Clinton supported removing Saddam? How about saying the whitehouse needs an enema when Clinton supported regime change in Iraq?
THAT was my point - which shows your hypocracy and blindness.
CkG
Ummm, since when ISN'T Bush to blame? If I recall correctly, he was the one calling for war so vehemently. Stop living in the past Cad, I mean come on, it's 2003 - almost 2004 already. Clinton has been out of office for a long time now. Can you please just focus on what's going on now for once? I know you like to get OT and bring up Clinton all the time, but it's getting old. Seriously.
Ah, so we're ignoring past policies now. Nice, please inform the rest of the forum posters of this as most seem to look at history to judge. Why are you so sensitive about Clinton? Is it because you know he was worthless but have to protect him so he doesn't look as bad as you claim Bush is?
Hmmm.....blinders...yup
CkG
Come on Cad - decide. Is Clinton worthless? If so, how can you continue to use him to defend Bush? Like I've said on so many, many, occasions, I don't give two craps about Clinton. YOU'RE the one who continually pulls him out of a hat like some kind of magic rabbit. Hell, maybe you're content using the
Chewbacca Defense but the rest of us would still like to know why we went to war with Iraq.