Originally posted by: PingSpike
You're wasting your breath trying to convince them to take an objective look at things. They're so partisan that Bush could shoot a baby in the face with a handgun on national TV and they'd still '~butclinton' it.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Actually I was way off the line on that one.
Here is a more accurate picture 😀
Originally posted by: AEB
Busmaster11 Hans blix said they didnt find any weapons but they also didnt find evidence of them destroying what they had.
That's not correct. While I won't claim that's an exact quote, there have been numerous stories of insiders complaining they were ignored or worse when they tried to provide accurate intel to the Bush adminstration. Many have been discussed here. Look for "The Man who Knew", for starters.Originally posted by: AEB
This is amazing you guys believe 1 nutjob over the entire government. Bush points to the intell, and as far as i know no members in the intell community have stepped forward and said I told him saddam wasnt a threat.
And that clarke guy is a tool, we are in Afgan too, he makes it sound like we ignored afgan to go after iraq, holy crap multitasking
That's also not correct. On the contrary, Blix acknowledged they found significant evidence Iraq destroyed WMDs. Just last week he reiterated this on O'Reilley. The Iraqis took the U.N. inspectors to sites where they claimed they destroyed WMDs. Blix tested the soil at those locations and could confirm their claims. What he could not confirm is the quantity of weapons destroyed.Originally posted by: AEB
Busmaster11 Hans blix said they didnt find any weapons but they also didnt find evidence of them destroying what they had. ...
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
That's also not correct. On the contrary, Blix acknowledged they found significant evidence Iraq destroyed WMDs. Just last week he reiterated this on O'Reilley. The Iraqis took the U.N. inspectors to sites where they claimed they destroyed WMDs. Blix tested the soil at those locations and could confirm their claims. What he could not confirm is the quantity of weapons destroyed.Originally posted by: AEB
Busmaster11 Hans blix said they didnt find any weapons but they also didnt find evidence of them destroying what they had. ...
It would really help if you educated yourself better about the facts on Iraq/WMDs/etc. before you start jumping on others. Much of what the Bush spinmeisters told you was inaccurate.
You already made this BS claim in another thread. It doesn't get better with age.Originally posted by: Shad0hawK
clark is a joke! as i watched the interview you could see his eyes moving side to side as he read the script.
it is just the dems using 911 for political gain...but of course they do not hold themselves to rules they make for others.
come november i am pulling the republican lever because of the total abject hypocrasy of the democrats.
Actually, they did. It just didn't meet George's standards for accuracy, completeness, or telling him only what he wanted to hear.Originally posted by: Shad0hawK
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
That's also not correct. On the contrary, Blix acknowledged they found significant evidence Iraq destroyed WMDs. Just last week he reiterated this on O'Reilley. The Iraqis took the U.N. inspectors to sites where they claimed they destroyed WMDs. Blix tested the soil at those locations and could confirm their claims. What he could not confirm is the quantity of weapons destroyed.Originally posted by: AEB
Busmaster11 Hans blix said they didnt find any weapons but they also didnt find evidence of them destroying what they had. ...
It would really help if you educated yourself better about the facts on Iraq/WMDs/etc. before you start jumping on others. Much of what the Bush spinmeisters told you was inaccurate.
right they had no way of determining the amount actually destroyed, and the iraqi's somehow "forgot" to keep track...riiiggghhhht. plus do not forget the WMD the UN knew they had but STILL cannot account for.
Please document whatever you're talking about. Otherwise, I will assume it's just another Limbaugh/Coulter pseudo-fact.the dismissing of the WMD components found in weapons caches by saying "well they could be used for legitimate purposes" is plain dumb, most of the time the components are only mixed not long before use and have a short shelf life.
Take the time to continue the inspections, consider alternatives, build a real coalition, and develop an exit strategy. Most of all, teach King George and his minions that lying is wrong, the end does not justify the means, and any "accomplishments" achieved through dishonest means are irreparably tainted, no matter what.so pray tell what should have been done after over a decade of breaking the cease fire agreement? just assume the blew them all up and keep on with sanctions that only starved the iraqi people for over a decade while doing nothing to erode saddams power?
Originally posted by: Shad0hawK
clark is a joke! as i watched the interview you could see his eyes moving side to side as he read the script.
it is just the dems using 911 for political gain...but of course they do not hold themselves to rules they make for others.
come november i am pulling the republican lever because of the total abject hypocrasy of the democrats.
Originally posted by: AEB
Busmaster11 Hans blix said they didnt find any weapons but they also didnt find evidence of them destroying what they had.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Shad0hawK
clark is a joke! as i watched the interview you could see his eyes moving side to side as he read the script.
it is just the dems using 911 for political gain...but of course they do not hold themselves to rules they make for others.
come november i am pulling the republican lever because of the total abject hypocrasy of the democrats.
Anyone know with whom he teaches a class at Havard...anyone? anyone? Kerry? anyone?
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Take the time to continue the inspections, consider alternatives, build a real coalition, and develop an exit strategy. Most of all, teach King George and his minions that lying is wrong, the end does not justify the means, and any "accomplishments" achieved through dishonest means are irreparably tainted, no matter what.so pray tell what should have been done after over a decade of breaking the cease fire agreement? just assume the blew them all up and keep on with sanctions that only starved the iraqi people for over a decade while doing nothing to erode saddams power?
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Shad0hawK
clark is a joke! as i watched the interview you could see his eyes moving side to side as he read the script.
it is just the dems using 911 for political gain...but of course they do not hold themselves to rules they make for others.
come november i am pulling the republican lever because of the total abject hypocrasy of the democrats.
Anyone know with whom he teaches a class at Havard...anyone? anyone? Kerry? anyone?
Clarke is a lecturer at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government and teaches a class there with Rand Beers, Kerry's chief national security adviser. Yes, I'm sure you'll infer from this that Clarke is now working for Kerry's campaign. Go ahead, I know you want to. Even though you'd be full of it as usual.
Anyone want to guess who tunes Clarke's snowboard? Could it be connected to Kerry? Hmmmm?![]()
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Actually I was way off the line on that one.
Here is a more accurate picture 😀
Hehe
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Actually I was way off the line on that one.
Here is a more accurate picture 😀
Hehe
Not so funny. That pic is from when he was addressing some school children and we was told of the planes hitting the WTC 🙁
![]()
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Take the time to continue the inspections, consider alternatives, build a real coalition, and develop an exit strategy. Most of all, teach King George and his minions that lying is wrong, the end does not justify the means, and any "accomplishments" achieved through dishonest means are irreparably tainted, no matter what.so pray tell what should have been done after over a decade of breaking the cease fire agreement? just assume the blew them all up and keep on with sanctions that only starved the iraqi people for over a decade while doing nothing to erode saddams power?
Funny. That sounds a LOT like Sen. Kerry's position.
Hmmmm....