The first one costs $550. Every one after that is $50, once you have the plans and the printer your only cost is the plastic. This is still a long way from being practical, but that doesn't mean it's a joke. Give it a decade of refinement and improvements in raw materials and you're going to eventually get a process that ANYONE can use to create guns that would perform as well as high-end CNC models for a fraction of the price.
I didn't check before I posted but yeah that doesn't surprise me there's AR-15 polymer lowers. Now if these 3D printers can print with the tolerances necessary for a truly working AR lower, and use a composite polymer as feedstock, then I might be a little worried about people making their own lowers and just buying the upper and other parts online since the lower is the actual "firearm" that's registered.
And a mini-AR would be kinda cool, lol. 😉
Cool...a plastic gun. Worthless. Might as well just stick firecrackers in your nostrils and light them.
Metal 3D printing is already being done. No need to 3D print in plastic. The prices will fall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20R9nItDmPY
Interesting, but that's slow with lots of steps. Not something that would ever get popular for home use.
For something simple, why not a 3d printer using the same stuff they use in MIM or something similar, and then just bake it? You'd get shrinkage, but the software should be able to figure it all out.
Is the lower receiver the part that determines if an ar-15 is semi or full auto? I could see people printing that part and replacing the legal part.
Interesting, but that's slow with lots of steps. Not something that would ever get popular for home use.
For something simple, why not a 3d printer using the same stuff they use in MIM or something similar, and then just bake it? You'd get shrinkage, but the software should be able to figure it all out.
Electronics printing is what I want. Lost your remote? Print another! Buy standard rubber membrane #23X and a couple IR LEDs from the printable electronics supplement aisle for $0.50, print the replacement housing off an online DB, and throw it all inside.
It was not meant to express how useful it is to a limited scenario as if that scenario happened all the time. Rather, it was meant to express the opposite: solves many trivial little things that may happen.1) In my entire life I have never ever ever lost a remote to the point where it needed to be replaced. And I'll bet the vast majority of people are the same. The remote might wind up in the refrigerator or between the cushions on the sofa, but it never disappears entirely. And if it happens enough that a person needs a 3D printer specifically for that purpose that person needs to grow a brain, not a new remote.
I think you guys are missing the point.
Unlike CNC which requires fairly expensive tools + a skill that 99.9% of the population doesn't have, with 3D printing anybody with a $1000 machine can print the federally regulated part of a gun with no skill whatsoever.
While it is obviously not a full gun it IS what the law considers to be the gun, and the rest of the parts are easily obtained.
Now I'm not saying this is a bad thing, in general I'm all for gun ownership. But it does make the existing laws somewhat more difficult to enforce since you're no longer dealing with a relatively trackable number of devices (since the cost/skill barrier is high enough to thwart the average person).
It's mostly just interesting.
Viper GTS
how can no one have missed the most useful reason to make a plastic one shot gun
You want to assassinate something or hijack something. You have a weapon that is untraceable and can pass through metal detectors. Who cares if its only one shot. you get close enough thats all you need,