Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
It's possible.. but I still think it's more of a 'clut classic' than a 'cinema classic'
would it be a cult classic in addition to being a clut classic?
Originally posted by: skace
Why are you wearing that silly rabbit suit?
Whhhyyyyyy are you wearing that silly man suit?
Every once in awhile that shows up on my playlist at like 1am.
Originally posted by: junkerman123
Originally posted by: skace
Why are you wearing that silly rabbit suit?
Whhhyyyyyy are you wearing that silly man suit?
Every once in awhile that shows up on my playlist at like 1am.
That's one of my favorite lines ever...if you have it on mp3 please send it to me, e-mail in profile.
edit: the forums hate gmail apparently, but it's gmail.com, not REMOVEgmail.
Originally posted by: pOwder
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
It's possible.. but I still think it's more of a 'clut classic' than a 'cinema classic'
would it be a cult classic in addition to being a clut classic?
how about a clit classic?
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: pOwder
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
It's possible.. but I still think it's more of a 'clut classic' than a 'cinema classic'
would it be a cult classic in addition to being a clut classic?
how about a clit classic?
Debbie Does Dallas 15, watch it!
Originally posted by: DaShen
Ummm, it was an okay movie. It had quirky one liner comebacks, which teenagers and college kids thought were hilarious. The plot was supposed to convey the parodoxes and strange occurrances in time travelling. The movie was supposed to be trippy and beyond the norm which appealed to kids our age at the time, and the characters had a strange dark quirkiness to them which some people enjoyed. Camera angles were filmed just slightly off skew to give this sense of awkwardness, but I thought it was overdone. I thought the idea of people trying to analyze the movie's "nuances" and such was totally pedantic. It was a okay/good movie, but hardly the best movie out there.
The one liners were funny to an extent, but meh, I wouldn't go out and buy the DVD.
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Originally posted by: DaShen
Ummm, it was an okay movie. It had quirky one liner comebacks, which teenagers and college kids thought were hilarious. The plot was supposed to convey the parodoxes and strange occurrances in time travelling. The movie was supposed to be trippy and beyond the norm which appealed to kids our age at the time, and the characters had a strange dark quirkiness to them which some people enjoyed. Camera angles were filmed just slightly off skew to give this sense of awkwardness, but I thought it was overdone. I thought the idea of people trying to analyze the movie's "nuances" and such was totally pedantic. It was a okay/good movie, but hardly the best movie out there.
The one liners were funny to an extent, but meh, I wouldn't go out and buy the DVD.
EXACTLY what I thought. At first I loved it, but when I re-watched it, I just thought "WTF?" As much as I hate to use this phrase, it's a really pseudo-intellectual movie.
Originally posted by: DaShen
Originally posted by: SLCentral
Originally posted by: DaShen
Ummm, it was an okay movie. It had quirky one liner comebacks, which teenagers and college kids thought were hilarious. The plot was supposed to convey the parodoxes and strange occurrances in time travelling. The movie was supposed to be trippy and beyond the norm which appealed to kids our age at the time, and the characters had a strange dark quirkiness to them which some people enjoyed. Camera angles were filmed just slightly off skew to give this sense of awkwardness, but I thought it was overdone. I thought the idea of people trying to analyze the movie's "nuances" and such was totally pedantic. It was a okay/good movie, but hardly the best movie out there.
The one liners were funny to an extent, but meh, I wouldn't go out and buy the DVD.
EXACTLY what I thought. At first I loved it, but when I re-watched it, I just thought "WTF?" As much as I hate to use this phrase, it's a really pseudo-intellectual movie.
A friend of mine was watching Donnie Darko while the Tour De France was on. I told him he could watch that movie anytime, but the TDF was something that he would regret missing.
He then went on to say, "Donnie Darko is the best movie of all time <or something to that effect>." I just gave him a blank stare. He then said, pseudo-jokingly, "You just don't have the mental capacity to understand the movie in its whole." So I decided to explain each part of the movie in detail and the flaws in the movie and even the use of camera tricks to that movie... I even quoted some of it. That shut him up. The Tour is what we watched mostly after that.It definitely is a pseudo-intelliectual movie.
Still, I'd rather watch paint dry that a "famous" bicycle race. Maybe your friend actually has a sense of entertainment. :evil:Originally posted by: DaShen
A friend of mine was watching Donnie Darko while the Tour De France was on. I told him he could watch that movie anytime, but the TDF was something that he would regret missing.
He then went on to say, "Donnie Darko is the best movie of all time <or something to that effect>." I just gave him a blank stare. He then said, pseudo-jokingly, "You just don't have the mental capacity to understand the movie in its whole." So I decided to explain each part of the movie in detail and the flaws in the movie and even the use of camera tricks to that movie... I even quoted some of it. That shut him up. The Tour is what we watched mostly after that.It definitely is a pseudo-intelliectual movie.
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Still, I'd rather watch paint dry that a "famous" bicycle race. Maybe your friend actually has a sense of entertainment. :evil:Originally posted by: DaShen
A friend of mine was watching Donnie Darko while the Tour De France was on. I told him he could watch that movie anytime, but the TDF was something that he would regret missing.
He then went on to say, "Donnie Darko is the best movie of all time <or something to that effect>." I just gave him a blank stare. He then said, pseudo-jokingly, "You just don't have the mental capacity to understand the movie in its whole." So I decided to explain each part of the movie in detail and the flaws in the movie and even the use of camera tricks to that movie... I even quoted some of it. That shut him up. The Tour is what we watched mostly after that.It definitely is a pseudo-intelliectual movie.
Originally posted by: lokiju
What does everyone thing of the directors cut vs the original?
I've only seen the directors cut but don't know if it's even worth watching the original.
Originally posted by: pOwder
So what exactly is the difference between the Director's Cut and the "original"?