Donald Trump Repeatedly Asked Why We Couldn’t Use Nukes

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,824
1,583
136
We can question how "conservative" Joe is but he is a acquaintance of Trump.

He is an acquaintance of Trump and someone I think really helped him get this far (in his Presidential run).

What context do you think would be needed? Do you think any rational person would understand why we shouldn't be using nuclear weapons?
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
He is an acquaintance of Trump and someone I think really helped him get this far (in his Presidential run).

What context do you think would be needed? Do you think any rational person would understand why we shouldn't be using nuclear weapons?

Its more about Joe knows a guy who knows a guy who was there and said something like that happened. Again its similar to yesterdays Hillary is directly supporting ISIS its way too short on facts.
 
Last edited:

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Guys, is it too much to ask that you not vote for a guy might get us all killed? Thanks in advance!
 

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126
Guys, is it too much to ask that you not vote for a guy might get us all killed? Thanks in advance!

This.

Hildabeast is a bitch and a half and definitely wrong for the country: but she's not a fucking psychopath who will end civilized life on earth because someone calls her hands small.

FUCKING WAKE UP.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
LOL, a source of a source of a source mentioned that a source mentioned that a source mentioned that a source said something, and I'm going to repeat it not only for ratings but because it'll make my Establishment overlords, who don't want someone they can't control having a chance to get elected, happy. Intellectuals eat it up and head nod at each other it's gospel. lulz
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
LOL, a source of a source of a source mentioned that a source mentioned that a source mentioned that a source said something, and I'm going to repeat it not only for ratings but because it'll make my Establishment overlords, who don't want someone they can't control having a chance to get elected, happy. Intellectuals eat it up and head nod at each other it's gospel. lulz
Any wagers on whether this turns out to be true or false?
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Any wagers on whether this turns out to be true or false?

It's Trump, WhoTF knows? I can see Trump sitting there sarcastically asking 'Why can't we use nukes' because he's an @sshole. Does that mean if he was actually elected POTUS that he'd actually even seriously contemplate using nukes? We'll never know since Trump will never be elected. Curiously, the track record of Billary sucks, but Dems are going on a head nodding group mastrubation about how they're sure Trump is going to nuke everyone. They've further spun this into the narrative that Trump can't be trusted with nukes, therefore, can't be trusted to be POTUS. It's LOLtertainment for sure...
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
It's Trump, WhoTF knows? I can see Trump sitting there sarcastically asking 'Why can't we use nukes' because he's an @sshole. Does that mean if he was actually elected POTUS that he'd actually even seriously contemplate using nukes? We'll never know since Trump will never be elected. Curiously, the track record of Billary sucks, but Dems are going on a head nodding group mastrubation about how they're sure Trump is going to nuke everyone. They've further spun this into the narrative that Trump can't be trusted with nukes, therefore, can't be trusted to be POTUS. It's LOLtertainment for sure...

Hillary, for all her negatives, is a known quantity. Trump OTOH is not.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
It's Trump, WhoTF knows? I can see Trump sitting there sarcastically asking 'Why can't we use nukes' because he's an @sshole. Does that mean if he was actually elected POTUS that he'd actually even seriously contemplate using nukes? We'll never know since Trump will never be elected. Curiously, the track record of Billary sucks, but Dems are going on a head nodding group mastrubation about how they're sure Trump is going to nuke everyone. They've further spun this into the narrative that Trump can't be trusted with nukes, therefore, can't be trusted to be POTUS. It's LOLtertainment for sure...


Dont vote for crazy bro. Nuclear winter is only cool in fallout. Well actually maybe we will get better graphics irl so...
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Hillary, for all her negatives, is a known quantity. Trump OTOH is not.

Yes, the known quantity is a horror of fake. She is the polished female Trump. I'd seriously rather roll the dice with Trump, especially since he actually at least pays lip service to doing something positive for average Americans in regards to the illegal invasion issue.

Dont vote for crazy bro. Nuclear winter is only cool in fallout. Well actually maybe we will get better graphics irl so...

Billary is crazy, don't you see that? Go watch her in all the old videos. Watch her now. Nothing has changed. She's an actor playing up to people stroking her ego. Each time someone goes on a Trump rant, they mine as well just replace Trump with Billary.

As for nuclear winter, as long as I get my 4K OLED first, I'm good. :D
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Democrats ?

US election 2016: Republican divisions grow over Trump


http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36962942

Without Naming Him, George W. Bush Takes On Trump

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-takes-on-trump-at-ohio-fundraiser?int=a14709


Bush should be the last person criticizing Trump with all the damage he has done,

For example, attendees reported that Bush said Muslim women should travel to the U.S. so they can encourage their home countries to emulate America's free society and bring equality to the Middle East. Trump, meanwhile, has floated the idea of restricting Muslims from entering the U.S.
This is the type of stupidity and double speak that comes out of the mouth of more and more of our establishment, politicians today.

So present day Iraqi women should travel to the USA so they can encourage their home country to bring back the freedoms they once had?:rolleyes:


Bush who helped turn Iraqi women, who had more rights under Sadaam, into second class citizens under Sharia law Iraq is now saying such stupidity shouldn't be judging anyone including Trump.
http://www.passportsusa.com/law/citizenship/citizenship_774.html
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Iraqi Laws and Procedures
The Iraqi Social Status (civil) Law follows the Islamic Sharia (Islamic legislation). Under Islamic law, an Iraqi Muslim female may not marry a non Muslim male. However an Iraqi Muslim male may marry a Muslim, Christian, or Jewish female.
[/FONT] [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Marriage of a Muslim to a Non-Muslim
Muslim women in Iraq are legally prohibited from marrying a non-Muslim. Therefore, the non-Muslim male must convert his religion to Islam and file a petition with the Social Status Court to declare that he is Muslim. Muslim men in Iraq are permitted to marry non-Muslim women if they are Christian or Jewish only. If the woman belongs to any other religion, she must convert to Islam.
[/FONT]


And what is truly sad the liberal establishment that fought tooth and nail against religious objections to gay marriage was strangely silent when this was going on during the Bush administration.
 
Last edited:

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,883
3,310
136
I can see Trump sitting there sarcastically asking 'Why can't we use nukes' because he's an @sshole. Does that mean if he was actually elected POTUS that he'd actually even seriously contemplate using nukes?

absolutely delusional.

We'll never know since Trump will never be elected.

you got that part right, you should start practicing your Madam President.

i say that sarcastically of course since you are so fond of calling people names like a little child does.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Billary is crazy, don't you see that? Go watch her in all the old videos. Watch her now. Nothing has changed. She's an actor playing up to people stroking her ego. Each time someone goes on a Trump rant, they mine as well just replace Trump with Billary.

She's entirely sane and lucid - responsible, even. If you think otherwise merely because you disagree with her opinions it's you who needs to get a grip.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
absolutely delusional.

I know, it's not head nodder so it's "delusional"...lol...

you got that part right, you should start practicing your Madam President.

I've been saying from the get go that Billary will be the next POTUS, this isn't like I'm coming to some sudden realization.

i say that sarcastically of course since you are so fond of calling people names like a little child does.

Names? If you're talking about Billary, that isn't a name, that is an accurate representation of the person. "Hillary" is Billary. Without Bill, Hillary is some stupid mouthy know it all bitch who marries a doctor for status, who ends up divorcing her because he can get a hotter piece of ass who doesn't ruin parties telling people how awesome she is while transparently being one of the most fake people you will ever meet.

Once "Hillary" found a kindered fake con person in Bill, she became Billary. You know how amazingly fake Bummer was in 2008, promising this and that, reading off the teleprompter so well, giving Dems and enough Moderates spewing stiffies over how he was an enough white black person who was going to cure all the world evils plus give them thousands of dollars to boot? How the Dems just could not see they were being conned, they thinkBelieved? Yeah, just replace Bummer with Billary, and 2008 with 2016. You all that align with Bernie apparently just will not learn...time for some more head nodding at yourselves... :thumbsup:
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
She's entirely sane and lucid - responsible, even. If you think otherwise merely because you disagree with her opinions it's you who needs to get a grip.

Trump is entirely sane and lucid - as sane and lucid as Billary. What you see with Billary is a practiced act - a show for the sheeple. You think you know what Billary believes because you actually believe Billary when she says something. I understand, she says it so genuinely. In such a caring manner. So serious sounding, so knowledgeable sounding. Again: It is an act.

Some things she may even have a personal preference on, but you'll never know because to know that (not "know", but truly know), you'd have to be Billary (perhaps Bill knows, maybe). What this election is between Billary and Trump is: a totally manufactured and polished rich Politician doing what She does best vs. a mostly manufactured and unpolished extremely rich businessman entertaining himself.

The Dems could have had Bernie, but the fix was in and Bernie, no matter what, wasn't going to be allowed to get the votes nominated to secure the nomination. A Bernie nomination would have been great, I mostly likely would have voted for Bernie over Trump. Now my choice is Trump, Johnson, or Stein. I'm not sure how any rational non-conned person could seriously vote for Billary. They'd completely have to tell themselves a story about her to justify that vote...perhaps make the Supreme Court nominee argument (why not just vote Johnson or Stein in that case?).
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Names? If you're talking about Billary, that isn't a name, that is an accurate representation of the person. "Hillary" is Billary. Without Bill, Hillary is some stupid mouthy know it all bitch who marries a doctor for status, who ends up divorcing her because he can get a hotter piece of ass who doesn't ruin parties telling people how awesome she is while transparently being one of the most fake people you will ever meet.

Stupid know-it-all.

You, sir, need to consider that your drinking might be a problem.

But keep raging for the status quo, man. It won't help you or prevent progress, but it seems like the only setting on your dial.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
Names? If you're talking about Billary, that isn't a name, that is an accurate representation of the person. "Hillary" is Billary. Without Bill, Hillary is some stupid mouthy know it all bitch who marries a doctor for status, who ends up divorcing her because he can get a hotter piece of ass who doesn't ruin parties telling people how awesome she is while transparently being one of the most fake people you will ever meet.

Once "Hillary" found a kindered fake con person in Bill, she became Billary. You know how amazingly fake Bummer was in 2008, promising this and that, reading off the teleprompter so well, giving Dems and enough Moderates spewing stiffies over how he was an enough white black person who was going to cure all the world evils plus give them thousands of dollars to boot? How the Dems just could not see they were being conned, they thinkBelieved? Yeah, just replace Bummer with Billary, and 2008 with 2016. You all that align with Bernie apparently just will not learn...time for some more head nodding at yourselves... :thumbsup:

This kind of bullshit needs to be stopped.
"a mouthy know it all bitch"... you had negligible credibility to begin with, that's fallen to zero.
"hotter piece of ass"
almost as though you're channeling drumpf. what a sad little man you are.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,338
31,414
136
Names? If you're talking about Billary, that isn't a name, that is an accurate representation of the person. "Hillary" is Billary. Without Bill, Hillary is some stupid mouthy know it all bitch who marries a doctor for status, who ends up divorcing her because he can get a hotter piece of ass who doesn't ruin parties telling people how awesome she is while transparently being one of the most fake people you will ever meet.

Congrats you've reached michal1980 levels of bitterness and stupidity, combined with the fear of blue_max and speedy.

Some achievement has been unlocked I'm sure.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Just wondering what percent additional probability of dying in a nuclear counterstrike is acceptable to Trump supporters?
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,240
136
Named source or not, what sane person watches Trump's behavior and concludes "yeah, I'd trust that guy with an arsenal of planet-killing weaponry."?
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
It's ALL about the US Supreme Court.
They figure Donald will give them the justices they want.
They, being the republican establishment.
Thing is....
A right wing controlled US Supreme Court would be pointless if half the country no longer exists. And what is left of the country consists only of radiated Americans on death watch.

Go ahead republican Trump supporters, nuke yourselves into Trump oblivion.
Maybe that 73 virgins in waiting thing is for real?
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Curiously, the track record of Billary sucks,
Curiously, as senator for NY, her track record and what she did for the state was pretty good. She came out years later and said the Iraq vote was a big mistake; kind of hard to fault her for that though, based on the information she was given.