GeekDrew
Diamond Member
- Jun 7, 2000
- 9,099
- 19
- 81
I didn't design our current naming scheme.
System-wide: (first initial)(last name)@companysdomain.tld
Department: (first name).(last name)@departmentsdomain.tld (which is just an alias to the system mailbox)
I personally prefer either of the below, given that middle initial can be omitted if preferred (and not required for distinction), and only using sequential numbering when Middle Initial or Middle Name fails to provide distinction.
LastName.FirstName.MiddleInitial.Sequential
FirstName.MiddleInitial.LastName.Sequential
I don't really think that "shorter is better", nor do i think that email addresses must be easily memorized. That's what business cards do... I wouldn't expect anyone to memorize my email address, nor should they expect me to memorize theirs.
System-wide: (first initial)(last name)@companysdomain.tld
Department: (first name).(last name)@departmentsdomain.tld (which is just an alias to the system mailbox)
I personally prefer either of the below, given that middle initial can be omitted if preferred (and not required for distinction), and only using sequential numbering when Middle Initial or Middle Name fails to provide distinction.
LastName.FirstName.MiddleInitial.Sequential
FirstName.MiddleInitial.LastName.Sequential
I don't really think that "shorter is better", nor do i think that email addresses must be easily memorized. That's what business cards do... I wouldn't expect anyone to memorize my email address, nor should they expect me to memorize theirs.
