DOJ: No misconduct by Woo or Bybee

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
TastesLikeChicken

TastesLikeChicken

Lifer
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35487219/ns/politics-white_house/

WASHINGTON - Two Bush administration lawyers who authorized harsh interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects used poor judgment but will not face punishment, the U.S. Justice Department said on Friday in summarizing a lengthy ethics report.

...
Click to expand...
Poor judgement?

Poor judgment "differs from professional misconduct in that an attorney may act inappropriately and thus exhibit poor judgment even though he or she may not have violated or acted in reckless disregard of a clear obligation or standard," the letter said.
Click to expand...

What a load of subjective baloney. Either they were legally in the wrong, or they weren't. "Poor judgement" sounds like nothing more than a political handjob to counter the fact that they couldn't find a way to legally bring charges against either man.
 
J

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
An in-depth analysis showed that they ignored existing law, multiple precedents, and misrepresented terms when offering their interpretations. Lies of both omission and commission used to render a legal opinion manufactured to meet predetermined parameters.

Should be disbarred at the least, preferably tried and convicted.
 
fallout man

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
1
0
TastesLikeChicken said:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35487219/ns/politics-white_house/

What a load of subjective baloney. Either they were legally in the wrong, or they weren't. "Poor judgement" sounds like nothing more than a political handjob to counter the fact that they couldn't find a way to legally bring charges against either man.
Click to expand...

I'm not surprised, and I'm equally disappointed. Welcome to post-9/11 America--and it's all George W. Bush's fault.

picard.jpg


Once we allow sleazy yellow (cowardly) lawyers to "lawyer-away" basic rights, everything goes down-hill from that point.

Why aren't the tea-baggers getting all pissed-off about this?
 
TastesLikeChicken

TastesLikeChicken

Lifer
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
UberNeuman

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
TastesLikeChicken said:
I had no problem with that when Bush did it and I have no problem when Obama does it. We would have been better off killing these guys on the battlefield instead of capturing them and sending them to Gitmo.
Click to expand...

You're never going to 'git 'em all.'

/no matter how many are killed...
 
TastesLikeChicken

TastesLikeChicken

Lifer
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
UberNeuman said:
You're never going to 'git 'em all.'

/no matter how many are killed...
Click to expand...
You're never gonna kill every roach either but you at least want to get the ones that might enter your house.

Unfortunately there's no such thing as terrorist spray. If only it was that simple.
 
J

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
TastesLikeChicken said:
I had no problem with that when Bush did it and I have no problem when Obama does it. We would have been better off killing these guys on the battlefield instead of capturing them and sending them to Gitmo.
Click to expand...

Does what? This thread isn't about detention, but rather "harsh interrogation methods", basically torture. If you have any evidence that the Obama Admin has employed such methods, link up or shut up.
 
Hacp

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
TastesLikeChicken said:
You're never gonna kill every roach either but you at least want to get the ones that might enter your house.

Unfortunately there's no such thing as terrorist spray. If only it was that simple.
Click to expand...

Well there is the nuke.. but we aren't allowed to use that.
 
C

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
fallout man said:
I'm not surprised, and I'm equally disappointed. Welcome to post-9/11 America--and it's all George W. Bush's fault.

picard.jpg


Once we allow sleazy yellow (cowardly) lawyers to "lawyer-away" basic rights, everything goes down-hill from that point.

Why aren't the tea-baggers getting all pissed-off about this?
Click to expand...

Because it's more complicated than crayons can deal with, and their masters didn't tell them to. When's the last time Beck or Palin took the position against these policies?
 
D

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
I know it's a fine line between misconduct and poor judgment, but if you read what these guys did and how they went about it, I don't see how any reasonable person could come to the conclusion that it wasn't misconduct. They ignored the law. They started with a position and then used contorted logic to support it for political reasons, with no legal backing at all.

Smells to me like one administration not wanting to open that can o' worms any further. They just want to put this thing behind us and move on, which makes some sense, but I would have preferred to see these guys punished for what they did. They probably did more harm to the country than any terrorist has ever done. :(
 
kage69

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,997
46,599
136
Bybee and Yoo should be behind bars. I don't support Obama in his desire to just move on and forget the whole thing. We keep making excuses for this kind of abuse and it will continue to happen.
 
Hacp

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Why shouldn't we be torturing these terrorists until they spill everything? They want to destroy America. I hope we aren't giving them hot meals, that would be unacceptable.
 
TastesLikeChicken

TastesLikeChicken

Lifer
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Jhhnn said:
Does what? This thread isn't about detention, but rather "harsh interrogation methods", basically torture. If you have any evidence that the Obama Admin has employed such methods, link up or shut up.
Click to expand...
This thread is about the DOJ finding no misconduct by Woo or Bybee. You can try to divert it to being about TORTURE! but you'd be wrong, Jhhhn, since no such charges have been brought against either man.

And to explain it further, I was stating that I have no problem with either Bush or Obama issuing orders that allow us to assasinate these guys on the battlefield or whereever. If we simply kill them instead there won't be any need for detention or torture. Comprende?
 
H

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Double Trouble said:
I know it's a fine line between misconduct and poor judgment, but if you read what these guys did and how they went about it, I don't see how any reasonable person could come to the conclusion that it wasn't misconduct. They ignored the law. They started with a position and then used contorted logic to support it for political reasons, with no legal backing at all.

Smells to me like one administration not wanting to open that can o' worms any further. They just want to put this thing behind us and move on, which makes some sense, but I would have preferred to see these guys punished for what they did. They probably did more harm to the country than any terrorist has ever done. :(
Click to expand...

All of this, but especially the bolded.

Hey, Chickie. Your thread title is bullshit propaganda. Plain and Simple.

Woo or Bybee were not charged with a criminal offense, (should have been) AND were guilty of serious ethical violations.

Ergo ...

Chickie: Just Another Hypocritical Law and Order Con







--
 
TastesLikeChicken

TastesLikeChicken

Lifer
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
heyheybooboo said:
All of this, but especially the bolded.

Hey, Chickie. Your thread title is bullshit propaganda. Plain and Simple.

Woo or Bybee were not charged with a criminal offense, (should have been) AND were guilty of serious ethical violations.

Ergo ...

Chickie: Just Another Hypocritical Law and Order Con







--
Click to expand...
Heyboobie. Click on the link in the OP. You'll note that the headline is:

U.S.: No misconduct by interrogation lawyers

Go complain to MSNBC that they are spreading "bullshit propaganda."

btw, your opinion is not law, it's merely your own opinion. And you know what they say about opinions...
 
M

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,594
6,715
126
Hacp said:
Why shouldn't we be torturing these terrorists until they spill everything? They want to destroy America. I hope we aren't giving them hot meals, that would be unacceptable.
Click to expand...

The reason is obvious except to worthless pieces of shit like you and for obvious reasons. If every American were the same immoral garbage you are, it would make no difference who won this war of terror. In victory or defeat the same level of slime would prevail.
 
M

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,594
6,715
126
TastesLikeChicken said:
This thread is about the DOJ finding no misconduct by Woo or Bybee. You can try to divert it to being about TORTURE! but you'd be wrong, Jhhhn, since no such charges have been brought against either man.

And to explain it further, I was stating that I have no problem with either Bush or Obama issuing orders that allow us to assasinate these guys on the battlefield or whereever. If we simply kill them instead there won't be any need for detention or torture. Comprende?
Click to expand...

Another moral leper. If we just kill them we will be them.
 
Lemon law

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
As TLC says in his opening post, poor judgment or criminal behavior.

If nothing else, maybe its time to realize that these two men, highly overpaid at that, wasted an inordinate amount of the taxpayers money advocating something clearly against all domestic and international law.

If they did it on their own time and not on the taxpayers dime, it might fall under the category of free speech, but since it was on the taxpayers dime, they should have been summarily fired on the basis of incompetence and wasting the taxpayers money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom