• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Doh, repost.

I

imported_Tomato

Diamond Member
Linkie, don't think it's a repost.

MARCH 12--A Utah woman who refused a Caesarean section that doctors believed would have saved the life of one of her unborn twins was charged with murder yesterday. Melissa Ann Rowland, 28, was named in the below criminal information filed in District Court by Salt Lake City prosecutors. Investigators contend that Rowland exhibited "depraved indifference to human life" when she rejected the Caesarean in mid-January because she did not want to be scarred by the surgery. Rowland, according to one nurse who spoke with police, said she would rather "lose one of the babies than be cut like that." Prosecutors contend that Rowland was repeatedly warned that her twins could die without the C-section. When she delivered the children on January 13, one baby was stillborn, while the other twin survived.
Click to expand...

:|:|:|
 
Originally posted by: Dezign
Linkie, don't think it's a repost.

MARCH 12--A Utah woman who refused a Caesarean section that doctors believed would have saved the life of one of her unborn twins was charged with murder yesterday. Melissa Ann Rowland, 28, was named in the below criminal information filed in District Court by Salt Lake City prosecutors. Investigators contend that Rowland exhibited "depraved indifference to human life" when she rejected the Caesarean in mid-January because she did not want to be scarred by the surgery. Rowland, according to one nurse who spoke with police, said she would rather "lose one of the babies than be cut like that." Prosecutors contend that Rowland was repeatedly warned that her twins could die without the C-section. When she delivered the children on January 13, one baby was stillborn, while the other twin survived.
Click to expand...

:|:|:|
Click to expand...

yeah its a repost.

but it was a while ago.
 
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Good for them, she should be put away for a while.
Click to expand...

rolleye.gif
 
yeah she was on foxnews the other day; apparently she's already had 2 c-sections so it wasnt the op that made her refuse.... plus according to her they never told her she needed one until like an hr b4 she went into labour.

makes u wonder where u can draw the line on children's rights....
 
Originally posted by: veggiefrog
yeah she was on foxnews the other day; apparently she's already had 2 c-sections so it wasnt the op that made her refuse.... plus according to her they never told her she needed one until like an hr b4 she went into labour.

makes u wonder where u can draw the line on children's rights....
Click to expand...

I would say the killing of a child by negligence is a good line to be drawn. :|
 
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: veggiefrog
yeah she was on foxnews the other day; apparently she's already had 2 c-sections so it wasnt the op that made her refuse.... plus according to her they never told her she needed one until like an hr b4 she went into labour.

makes u wonder where u can draw the line on children's rights....
Click to expand...

I would say the killing of a child by negligence is a good line to be drawn. :|
Click to expand...

well i would like to get the full truthfull story.

I have read articles that stated that she was told she needed the c-section while in labor. she refused. but latter had the c-section anyway.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top