Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Quiksilver
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: zinfamous
all that shit
yeah yeah yeah, pics of your SO?
Careful, you might end up like this kid.
Haha

right click, save as.
Anyway, I'm just waiting for him to post either 1) that he's single or 2) his ugly ass fat saggy girlfriend so I can laugh that he's calling kim kardashian fat
I dunno.
I, above most at times, really appreciate a woman with some damn fine curves. But, Kim Kardashian has a strange look to her. To me, she is pretty damn attractive, but... that ass almost looks disproportionate to her upper body. But in general, she just has a very curvy waist and thick legs. Her upper body is nice too, so it really presents a striking curvy figure. Though, I do agree with Zin here on that it's pushing that border. I don't put that border as being fat, just moving past voluptuous and into the territory of too much cushion.
I'm pretty picky sadly. I hate bone thin women, don't want too much cushion, want a nice curvy body but not thick legs, just muscular legs. I think I mostly like the muscular leg look, not bulgy, just defined, as it's a sign the woman cares about her fitness/health/figure. Some just get the curves naturally, but with those, like Kim Kardashian, that don't really look like they exercise much, that figure can go sour REAL quick.
I want to always be attracted to an SO, but because of obvious connections, and because they maintain the figure from the first meeting, or improved even.
But yeah, society has almost brainwashed most young men into looking for that sickly skinny look, and a lot of those marriages go south it seems, as it's all so shallow in appeal.
By nature, we're programmed to look for those curvy woman. I've always looked at ass the most it seems, and now I'm figuring out why. It's man's nature: curves, especially a curvy waist, generally means a more healthy (overall) woman who'll provide the highest chances of delivering a healthy child.
