• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Does Vista dream of Electric Sheep

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I'm not saying that buffer caching is bad. I am saying that Vista's implementation is not best solution for some/many cases and it should be more tweakable. Right now you can either enable or disable it. It should be more conservative for laptops.

Those are all fair points, but much different from what you originally said.
 
Originally posted by: dclive
Caching so that the next app or item he needs is already in RAM.

Let me know when Window's start predicting exactly what a user is going to do next , and I'll be the first to buy this ground breaking tech 🙂 Ram swapping, and the CPU stalling cannot be good for performance.
 
Originally posted by: Regs
Originally posted by: dclive
Caching so that the next app or item he needs is already in RAM.

Let me know when Window's start predicting exactly what a user is going to do next , and I'll be the first to buy this ground breaking tech 🙂 Ram swapping, and the CPU stalling cannot be good for performance.

It's been available for almost two years now. Maybe you should save your money and buy Vista for dummies.

😀
 
Back
Top