Does this man ever tell the truth?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
Also, no one ever proved that Clinton intended to lie and wasn't just mistaken.

Clinton: "I tried to walk a fine line between acting lawfully and testifying falsely, but I now recognize that I did not fully accomplish this goal and am certain my responses to questions about Ms. Lewinsky were false,"

Here Clinton doesn't state he was "mistaken", he comes right out and admits his statements were done purposely.

The only reason Clinton wasn't "convicted" of perjury was because he settled the case with Ray.
 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
That's a good out for politicians.

"Sorry I promised you one million jobs were going to be created. I thought there would be...I was mistaken..." :p
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Gaard
Lying under oath.

Nooo...lying under oath is not perjury unless the charges are material to the case.

Also, no one ever proved that Clinton intended to lie and wasn't just mistaken.

So it's your contention tha Clinton didn't commit perjury?

Was he untruthful? Probably

Did he commit perjury under legal definitions? No

Does it matter? Not in my opinion.
 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Gaard
Lying under oath.

Nooo...lying under oath is not perjury unless the charges are material to the case.

Also, no one ever proved that Clinton intended to lie and wasn't just mistaken.

What could've been used as proof of his intent to lie?
Just curious, how does one prove that?
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Gaard
Lying under oath.

Nooo...lying under oath is not perjury unless the charges are material to the case.

Also, no one ever proved that Clinton intended to lie and wasn't just mistaken.

So it's your contention tha Clinton didn't commit perjury?

Was he untruthful? Probably

Did he commit perjury under legal definitions? No

Does it matter? Not in my opinion.

Well the Arkansas and US Supreme Court disagree. And their opinion does matter.

 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Gaard
Lying under oath.

Nooo...lying under oath is not perjury unless the charges are material to the case.

Also, no one ever proved that Clinton intended to lie and wasn't just mistaken.


It's ok to lie under oath as long as your lie has no direct bearing on the case? Like, if I raised my right hand and swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...I don't really have to do that?
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: BDawg

Does it matter? Not in my opinion.


It doesn't matter if our president commits perjury?

I think what Clinton did is not desirable (and as I said, not perjury), but far less wrong than how Bush engineered a war against Iraq.
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Gaard
Lying under oath.

Nooo...lying under oath is not perjury unless the charges are material to the case.

Also, no one ever proved that Clinton intended to lie and wasn't just mistaken.


It's ok to lie under oath as long as your lie has no direct bearing on the case? Like, if I raised my right hand and swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...I don't really have to do that?

I didn't say it was right. I said it wasn't perjury.
 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: BDawg

Does it matter? Not in my opinion.


It doesn't matter if our president commits perjury?

I think what Clinton did is not desirable (and as I said, not perjury), but far less wrong than how Bush engineered a war against Iraq.

He could've been mistaken :p
 

flavio

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,823
1
76
Ever notice how people like to gloss over any Bush wrongdoings by pointing at someone else?

As if that makes it ok or something in their minds.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: flavio
Ever notice how people like to gloss over any Bush wrongdoings by pointing at someone else?

As if that makes it ok or something in their minds.

And they'll probably respond to your post by attacking you ... because, like Bush, they don't like being accountable for their own behavior. Reminds me of my children.
 

NesuD

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,999
106
106
Originally posted by: flavio
Ever notice how people like to gloss over any Bush wrongdoings by pointing at someone else?

As if that makes it ok or something in their minds.

Ah but you are assuming what Bush did was wrong. That is just your opinion. As far as i can tell it wasn't a legal violation on the other hand one hell of an argument can be made for the illegality of Slick Willys alleged perjury.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: NesuD
Originally posted by: flavio
Ever notice how people like to gloss over any Bush wrongdoings by pointing at someone else?

As if that makes it ok or something in their minds.

Ah but you are assuming what Bush did was wrong. That is just your opinion. As far as i can tell it wasn't a legal violation on the other hand one hell of an argument can be made for the illegality of Slick Willys alleged perjury.

There's no argument about it. He's guilty.

As for the OP and the whining of flavio, there is a difference between lying and rhetoric. It was clearly layed out in the website she praised earlier. I'm still waiting for her to answer CPA's question about Clinton.
 

flavio

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,823
1
76
The president lying and misleading the country is wrong whether or not it is illegal and whether or not it was Clinton then or Bush now.

Lies regarding political issues concern me much more than sexual matters though...and lies by the current administration are much more relevant than the ones of past administrations.

But people will continue to avoid current issues and make excuses for Bush by pointing elsewhere. It's just too difficult to address the issue at hand.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
I actually believe that Dubya believes what he is saying. He has total faith in those who are telling him what to say and do! Dubya couldn't lie to the American People purposely and get away with it. He's just not mentally capable of pulling it off. Though he might be a C student, he's an honest C Student.
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,512
3,946
136
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
Ultra quiet is right, it's political rhetoric common practice in politcs. Bush just happens to be really sloppy with his rhetoric, it appears political speech making was never his strong point.

Could you honestly say which President was the last to write his own speeches? I absolutely have no idea, but I suspect that ended quite some time ago or has only occurred in limited cases.


clinton
 

Mean MrMustard

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2001
3,144
10
81
How we went from questioning the truth of Bush to saying it is OK because Clinton did it, I will never know...

While we are on Clinton, what does the business of the federal government of the United States have in questioning Clinton on his sex life?

If he was accused of sexual assault or rape, obviously it would be an issue. But outside that, it is a matter between him and his wife. Now, if she would have brought charges, it would have been a different story. Instead, a certain Ms. Tripp had to be prodded to testify and here we are today... judging Bush's actions on Clinton.

If Clinton was such a bad president, why do all of you "self-proclaimed" conservatives base his success on Clinton? It's pretty pathetic if you ask me.

By the way, no, I am not a Clinton sympathizer.
 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
Show me a politician that doesn't lie and I'll show you a corpse.
Does that make it right? No. But we as a populace deserve what we get in the white house and deserve to get lied to if we constantly vote liars into the office. The problem is the only way for a candidate to get our vote is to lie to us. Vicious cycle, I don't have a solution :(