**shakes head at thread**
Everyone can just be doctors, lawyers, computer IT guys and engineers. Problem solved.
So much fail not even funny.
All wealth comes from either making something, mining something, or grwing something. Everything else is dependent on those.
Nevermind that apple does manufacture, the only reason we are able to afford iphones is credit which will run out one way or another. Either sudden stop or hyperinflation. Then you will see what a nation looks like that does not produce what it consumes.
BTW USA is still #1 in manufacturing, growing and mining but even so not what we consume which is why we run debt.
I see that and wonder what we are making? I really think that the processed food that we make so much is what propels us in manufacturing vs the rest of the world. That and maybe big ticket items like planes and military (oh and we do make cars here too - for now). What can I buy in 99% of the stores out there that's made in the US? Can you guys name every day items (TV's? PC's, clocks, clothes, shoes, faucets, tools, toothbrushes, hair brushes, monitors, etc x millions). Manufacturing in the US provides much more than just manual labor jobs. There are millions of supporting engineering and R&D jobs that are associated with the very processes that we make stuff here. Move those factories offshore and those jobs go with them. The people who build and work on robot cells, machine tools, industrial sensors and supplies...all gone in one fell swoop.
Not to mention that I read that over 50% of R&D money in the US comes from manufacturers here (can't validate that stat. as I don't know how to quantify it..just passing along).
Step #6....here we come.
I've wondered the same thing. Certain people around here love to talk about how the US is one of the top manufacturers in the world, but I just don't see it. Autos and food must be a massive portion of it.
In a remarkable turnaround, the sector is prospering by winning orders from emerging markets, its supposed nemesis.
Consider one unexpected tidbit Mr. Tal uncovered in his statistical sleuthing: He found that one of the fastest growing U.S. export categories consists of selling toys to China a market the Chinese are supposed to dominate. U.S. sales in this niche are surging, rising from only $14-million (U.S.) in 2008 to $240-million in the first nine months of this year, a staggering 17-fold increase.
...
Merchandise exports from the United States have risen at an annual rate of more than 10 per cent during the first three quarters of this year.
Even more remarkable, sales to emerging markets like China have surged a staggering 45 per cent since the beginning of 2009, more than twice the pace observed in sales to developed countries. Sales to emerging markets have offset weakness in merchandise shipments to Europe, which slipped more than 3 per cent on an annual basis in the third quarter.
Years from now, when the fog clears, it will become apparent that the big recession gave birth to a profound change in the structure of the U.S. manufacturing sector a process that is currently in full swing, Mr. Tal wrote.
U.S. companies have been able to win export orders because theyve cut costs, introduced innovative products and increased productivity at a faster clip than any other advanced country over the past decade, lagging only South Korea and Taiwan. The manufacturing sector in the U.S. is now recapturing lost market share in emerging markets, even at the expense of Germany, still the leading exporter to these countries, Mr. Tal wrote.
Auto definitely is, but you guys are doing well in general. Hell, you're even kicking butt exporting right back to China.
U.S. manufacturing makes quiet comeback
No, we don't need factories, and factories in a general sense aren't even that desirable. They are dirty, dangerous places for people to work that cause environmental damage and burden our health system.
Of course there will always be factories in the US, and you could make the case for a national security issue if we lost too much of our base, but seriously, factories suck.
Righties are sooo lame.
The reason that the incomes of the financial elite have far outstripped those of everybody else in this country is that they're offshoring production for cheaper labor at an incredible rate, leaving americans unemployed. Instead of wages and assets, workers get bigger lines of credit and longer to pay, at every level including the govt.
It'd be a different matter if we were smart enough to tax our wealthy at a rate sufficient to offset the losses by american workers, and to restrain middle class greed.
We voted that down when we elected Ronnie, and we've been living in a fools' paradise ever since. The 2010 US balance of payments deficit will total ~$500B for 2010, and our wealthiest citizens take a big cut off the top of that. They love it, because govt borrowing holds up the value of the dollar, enabling more offshoring, and because that deficit represents increased profits for them.
they're now holding what's left of the economy hostage to ongoing taxcuts for themselves, and the longer we let that continue, the greater their power becomes. Before it's over, we'll probably be happy to be abused, just so we'll get something, anything, from the power elite. Rank and file Righties are already there, begging for it, but some of the rest of us remain uppity- we think this is still a democracy, despite all the evidence to the contrary...
I've said many times a country that cannot provide for itself is no longer a country.
You don't need engineers, accountants, marketers, or even bankers without product. None generate wealth they strip off real wealth which is consumption goods and assets.Exactly. Without denigrating other value-add professions, all commerce begins with one of those three actions. Sure, lawyers and salesmen and IT and managers all have reasons to exist, but they don't exist without somebody growing, mining, or building something first. They're value-add, not value-create.
I've wondered the same thing. Certain people around here love to talk about how the US is one of the top manufacturers in the world, but I just don't see it. Autos and food must be a massive portion of it.
You don't need engineers, accountants, marketers, or even bankers without product. None generate wealth they strip off real wealth which is consumption goods and assets.
We are #1 manufacturing but won't be for long. Defense goodies are about 250 Billion of it. There is CAT, MS, Intel, Pharma, Autos and a bunch of other stuff.
USA is about 1.5T
China about 1.2T
Germany about 0.8T
Thing is China went from peanuts just 15 years ago. Germany was half. We were higher....stay tuned.
I want us to be more like Germany, a net exporter, and envy of Europe. Not Spain or other deadbeats. Afraid we are going wrong direction.
Not really, the thing about Germany is that the engineering they do is high precision-high quality. Their workers are payed a fair wage and they for the most part live good lives. The poor are taken care of and the health care is acceptable by most countries standards.
The engineering and production base is still relatively strong by your own metrics and the rebirth of the auto companies should offset at least some of the losses in mfg...
Wages are rising in China and Germany alike and even places like Taiwan , Vietnam, Korea and the Bric all getting huge standard of living increases.
The cynic in me and the conservative wants to see the system break down and reinvent itself in a blaze of innovation and change but the other side thinks the poor and elderly will bear the biggest burden. Socially what has separated the US from the rest of the world has been the humane and caring aspect of their social policy. If you look at the time since SS started the standard of living has only improved or remained consistent for the elderly as a result of SS and UE..Standards for poor people improved for generations...
Mfg has to stay important for the long term health of our economy. Losing a large part of the middle class base would seriously wound the countries ability to consume since raw consumption and little else frankly is the largest metric to judge our economy by.
Is capitalism really about the sellers or is it about the buyers? Who advocates for the sellers and who advocates for the buyers?
irwin When there is a s500 in every driveway you can talk about automation in meantime there is unlimited demand (always will be). When we have balanced trade you can talk about automation. This is nothing more than profit taking at lower/middle class Americans expense. Only an idiot does not see that.
Tell me what you do and I'll prove you are just stripping off one of the three. I sell booze. I don't make the booze or cut the crops r the bottles or the cardboard but I'm just a cog in getting something that was grown and manufactured to market. Problem is it all starts there without which you look like chad. Not too many jobs in chad.
Totally. Then we'll make up the trade deficit by selling law services overseas to.... hmmmm wait a second :hmm:**shakes head at thread**
Everyone can just be doctors, lawyers, computer IT guys and engineers. Problem solved.
How do you explain actual real world numbers in regards to how much is being produced by how many people? Every year, workers become more efficient, mostly due to the expansion of technology into the industrial workplace.
Only an idiot would miss the fact that the average worker today can produce a hell of a lot more than an average worker 20 or 30 years ago. It is common sense, and this has been the case since the start of the industrial revolution.
